Gottfried de Purucker: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== Personal accounts of GdeP == | |||
The Bishop of Los Angeles, Francis Eric Bloy, wrote: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
I heard him lecture on many occasions. As a student of comparative religions myself, I was always impressed by his erudition and the simplicity of his presentation. In the Question and Answer periods which followed many of his lectures, he was always patient and understanding and never patronizing. He was a wise and gentle teacher. I have often thought that the Tibetan doctrine of tulku might well apply to him. He was a man of great conviction, courage and hope. | |||
<ref>Francis Eric Bloy letter to Boris de Zirkoff. November 26, 1973. Records Series 22. Boris de Zirkoff Papers. Theosophical Society in America Archives.</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== Later years == | == Later years == | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 20 March 2014
Early years
Work in Point Loma
Work in Covina
Personal accounts of GdeP
The Bishop of Los Angeles, Francis Eric Bloy, wrote:
I heard him lecture on many occasions. As a student of comparative religions myself, I was always impressed by his erudition and the simplicity of his presentation. In the Question and Answer periods which followed many of his lectures, he was always patient and understanding and never patronizing. He was a wise and gentle teacher. I have often thought that the Tibetan doctrine of tulku might well apply to him. He was a man of great conviction, courage and hope. [1]
Later years
Writings
Notes
- ↑ Francis Eric Bloy letter to Boris de Zirkoff. November 26, 1973. Records Series 22. Boris de Zirkoff Papers. Theosophical Society in America Archives.