Mahatma Letter No. 132: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:ML from Koot Hoomi]]
[[Category:ML needs background]]
[[Category:ML needs publication history]]
[[Category:ML needs commentary]]
{{Infobox MLbox
{{Infobox MLbox
| header1 = People involved |
| header1 = People involved |
| writtenby        = [[Koot Hoomi]]
| writtenby        = [[H. P. Blavatsky]]
| receivedby        = [[A. P. Sinnett]]
| receivedby        = [[A. P. Sinnett]]
| sentvia          = unknown
| sentvia          = unknown
Line 11: Line 7:
| writtendate      = unknown
| writtendate      = unknown
| receiveddate      = October 1884
| receiveddate      = October 1884
| otherdate        = none
| otherdate        = unknown
| header3 = Places
| header3 = Places
| sentfrom          = unknown
| sentfrom          = unknown
| receivedat        = London   
| receivedat        = London   
| vialocation      = none
| vialocation      = unknown{{pad|9em}}
}}
}}
'''This is Letter No. 135 in Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 132#Context and background|Context and background]].
This is '''Letter No. 132''' in ''' [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)|''The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett'']], 4th chronological edition'''. It corresponds to '''Letter No. 135''' in '''Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 132#Context and background|Context and background]].
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Line 31: Line 27:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
My dear Mr. Sinnett,
My dear [[Alfred Percy Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]],


For fear that you should "trace back" to me a new treachery, permit me to say that I have never said to [[Wilhelm Hübbe-Schleiden|Hubbe Schleiden]] and [[Gebhard family|Frank Gebhard]] that the existence of our [[Planetary Chain|seven objective planets]] was an allegory. What I said was, that the objectivity and actuality of the septenary chain had nothing to do with the correct understanding of the [[Round|seven rounds]]. That outside of the initiates no one knew the mot final of this  
For fear that you should "trace back" to me a new treachery, permit me to say that I have never said to [[Wilhelm Hübbe-Schleiden|Hubbe Schleiden]] and [[Gebhard family|Frank Gebhard]] that the existence of our [[Planetary Chain|seven objective planets]] was an allegory. What I said was, that the objectivity and actuality of the septenary chain had nothing to do with the correct understanding of the [[Round|seven rounds]]. That outside of the [[Initiation|initiates]] no one knew the mot final of this  


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
Line 50: Line 46:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
mystery. That you could not understand it thoroughly, nor explain it, because [[Koot Hoomi|Mahat K.H.]] told you hundred times that you could not be told the whole doctrine; that you knew [[Allan Octavian Hume|Hume]] had made him questions and cross-examined Him until his hair became grey. That there were hundred apparent inconsistencies just because you had not the key to the x777x and could not be given it. In short that you gave the truth, but by far not the whole truth especially about rounds and rings which was only at best allegorical.
mystery. That you could not understand it thoroughly, nor explain it, because [[Koot Hoomi|Mahat. K.H.]] told you hundred times that you could not be told the whole doctrine; that you knew [[Allan Octavian Hume|Hume]] had made him questions and cross-examined Him until his hair became grey. That there were hundred apparent inconsistencies just because you had not the key to the x777x and could not be given it. In short that you gave the truth, but by far not the whole truth especially about [[Chains and Rounds|rounds and rings]] which was only at best allegorical.


Yours,
Yours,


H.P.B.
[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|H.P.B.]]


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
Line 63: Line 59:
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
* '''x777x''' refers to reincarnations.
* '''x777x''' refers to "the problem of the 777 [[Reincarnation|incarnations]]" that Master K.H. spoke about in [[Mahatma Letter No. 66#Page 19|Mahatma Letter No. 66]].


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 84: Line 80:
== Notes ==
== Notes ==
<references/>
<references/>
<br>


== Additional resources ==
[[Category:ML from Koot Hoomi]]
[[Category:ML needs background]]
[[Category:ML to A. P. Sinnett]]
[[Category:ML with images]]
[[Category:ML needs commentary]]

Latest revision as of 03:28, 1 March 2020

Quick Facts
People involved
Written by: H. P. Blavatsky
Received by: A. P. Sinnett
Sent via: unknown
Dates
Written on: unknown
Received on: October 1884
Other dates: unknown
Places
Sent from: unknown
Received at: London
Via: unknown 

This is Letter No. 132 in The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, 4th chronological edition. It corresponds to Letter No. 135 in Barker numbering. See below for Context and background.

< Prev letter chrono  Next letter chrono >  
< Prev letter Barker  Next letter Barker >

Page 1 transcription, image, and notes

My dear Mr. Sinnett,

For fear that you should "trace back" to me a new treachery, permit me to say that I have never said to Hubbe Schleiden and Frank Gebhard that the existence of our seven objective planets was an allegory. What I said was, that the objectivity and actuality of the septenary chain had nothing to do with the correct understanding of the seven rounds. That outside of the initiates no one knew the mot final of this

132-1_7263_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • mot final is French for "final word."

Page 2

mystery. That you could not understand it thoroughly, nor explain it, because Mahat. K.H. told you hundred times that you could not be told the whole doctrine; that you knew Hume had made him questions and cross-examined Him until his hair became grey. That there were hundred apparent inconsistencies just because you had not the key to the x777x and could not be given it. In short that you gave the truth, but by far not the whole truth especially about rounds and rings which was only at best allegorical.

Yours,

H.P.B.

132-2_7264_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Context and background

Physical description of letter

The original is in the British Library, Folio 3. George Linton and Virginia Hanson described the letter this way:

In HPB's handwriting on both sides of a blue card, about 4" X 5" [10.2 X 12.7 cm].[1]

Publication history

Commentary about this letter

Notes

  1. George E. Linton and Virginia Hanson, eds., Readers Guide to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (Adyar, Chennai, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 204.