Stanzas of Dzyan

From Theosophy Wiki
Revision as of 15:07, 11 June 2012 by Pablo Sender (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Stanzas of Dzyan are, according to Mme. Blavatsky part of the Book of Dzyan of Tibetan origin. The Stanzas form the basis for The Secret Doctrine, one of the foundational works of the theosophical movement written by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky.

The Stanzas and its commentaries were originally written in the sacred language of Senzar, which is unknown to modern Anthropology:

This first installment of the esoteric doctrines is based upon Stanzas, which are the records of a people unknown to ethnology; it is claimed that they are written in a tongue absent from the nomenclature of languages and dialects with which philology is acquainted; they are said to emanate from a source (Occultism) repudiated by science; and, finally, they are offered through an agency, incessantly discredited before the world by all those who hate unwelcome truths, or have some special hobby of their own to defend. Therefore, the rejection of these teachings may be expected, and must be accepted beforehand. No one styling himself a "scholar," in whatever department of exact science, will be permitted to regard these teachings seriously.[1]


Mme. Blavatsky refers to Sanskrit, Tibetan, and Chinese translations of commentaries:

The Stanzas which form the thesis of every section are given throughout in their modern translated version, as it would be worse than useless to make the subject still more difficult by introducing the archaic phraseology of the original, with its puzzling style and words. Extracts are given from the Chinese Thibetan and Sanskrit translations of the original Senzar Commentaries and Glosses on the Book of DZYAN —these being now rendered for the first time into a European language. It is almost unnecessary to state that only portions of the seven Stanzas are here given. Were they published complete they would remain incomprehensible to all save the few higher occultists. Nor is there any need to assure the reader that, no more than most of the profane, does the writer, or rather the humble recorder, understand those forbidden passages. To facilitate the reading, and to avoid the too frequent reference to foot-notes, it was thought best to blend together texts and glosses, using the Sanskrit and Tibetan proper names whenever those cannot be avoided, in preference to giving the originals. The more so as the said terms are all accepted synonyms, the former only being used between a Master and his chelas (or disciples).[2]


The Secret Doctrine published two sets of Stanzas: one on cosmic evolution and the other on human evolution. With regard to the first set Mme. Blavatsky wrote:

The reader has to bear in mind that the Stanzas given treat only of the Cosmogony of our own planetary System and what is visible around it, after a Solar Pralaya. The secret teachings with regard to the Evolution of the Universal Kosmos cannot be given, since they could not be understood by the highest minds in this age, and there seem to be very few Initiates, even among the greatest, who are allowed to speculate upon this subject.[3]


The Stanzas, therefore, give an abstract formula which can be applied, mutatis mutandis, to all evolution: to that of our tiny earth, to that of the chain of planets of which that earth forms one, to the solar Universe to which that chain belongs, and so on, in an ascending scale, till the mind reels and is exhausted in the effort.
The seven Stanzas given in this volume represent the seven terms of this abstract formula. They refer to, and describe the seven great stages of the evolutionary process, which are spoken of in the Purânas as the “Seven Creations,” and in the Bible as the “Days” of Creation.[4]


Talking about the second set of Stanzas, that on Anthropogenesis, Blavatsky wrote:

The Stanzas, with the Commentaries thereon, in this Book, the second, are drawn from the same Archaic Records as the Stanzas on Cosmogony in Book I . As far as possible a verbatim translation is given; but some of the Stanzas were too obscure to be understood without explanation. Hence, as was done in Book I., while they are first given in full as they stand, when taken verse by verse with their Commentaries an attempt is made to make them clearer, by words added in brackets, in anticipation of the fuller explanation of the Commentary.[5]


Notes

  1. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xxxvii.
  2. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 22-23.
  3. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 13.
  4. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 20-21.
  5. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 1.

Further reading