Dugpa - Revision history

SysopJ: /* Online resources */

2023-11-16T21:08:19Z

Online resources

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 16 November 2023
Line 66:		Line 66:
	===Articles===		===Articles===
	* [https://theosophy.world/encyclopedia/dugpa "Dugpa"] at Theosophy World.		* [https://theosophy.world/encyclopedia/dugpa "Dugpa"] at Theosophy World.
	*[~~http~~://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/~~1315#~~ "Harry Potter and Dugpa"] by John Algeo. Originally published in ''The Quest'' 95.4 (July-August, 2007), 135-139.		*[https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/harry-potter-and-dugpa "Harry Potter and Dugpa"] by John Algeo. Originally published in ''The Quest'' 95.4 (July-August, 2007), 135-139.
	*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/ReincarnationsInTibet.htm# "Reincarnations in Tibet"] by H. P. Blavatsky.		*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/ReincarnationsInTibet.htm# "Reincarnations in Tibet"] by H. P. Blavatsky.
	*[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# "Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings?"] by David Reigle.		*[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# "Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings?"] by David Reigle.

SysopJ at 00:48, 30 April 2021

2021-04-30T00:48:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 30 April 2021
Line 62:		Line 62:

	Micah Harris wrote a murder mystery called ''Ravenwood Stepson of Mystery: Return of the Dugpa''. There are some Reddits and Pinterests using the term.		Micah Harris wrote a murder mystery called ''Ravenwood Stepson of Mystery: Return of the Dugpa''. There are some Reddits and Pinterests using the term.

	~~== Notes ==~~
	~~<references/>~~

	==Online resources==		==Online resources==
Line 73:		Line 70:
	*[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# "Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings?"] by David Reigle.		*[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# "Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings?"] by David Reigle.

			== Notes ==
			<references/>

	[[Category:Buddhist concepts]]		[[Category:Buddhist concepts]]
	[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]		[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]

Pablo Sender: /* Red hats */

2021-02-11T17:43:37Z

Red hats

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 11 February 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	<blockquote>Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.</ref></blockquote>

	Of the four main sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas'', who wear yellow hats. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the Shamarpas wear red. In fact, in Tibet the term "red hat" (''zhwa mar'') tends to be used specifically for the Shamarpa (zhwa dmar pa) lineage of the somewhat controversial Shamar Rinpoche. ~~Thus, by "red hat" Blavatsky probably meant some Böns, Nyigmapas~~, ~~Shamarpas and Drukpas (see below)~~.		Of the four main sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas'', who wear yellow hats. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the Shamarpas wear red. In fact, in Tibet the term "red hat" (''zhwa mar'') tends to be used specifically for the Shamarpa (zhwa dmar pa) lineage of the somewhat controversial Shamar Rinpoche. Also connected to this term is one of the subschools of the Kagyü tradition and the dominant religious tradition in Bhutan, the Drukpa lineage.

	== Drukpa school ==		== Drukpa school ==

Pablo Sender at 17:39, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T17:39:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 11 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Dugpa''', in Theosophical literature, is a term used generally as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "[[Brother of the Shadow]]." The origin of the term is not clear. ~~Sometimes~~ it seems to be used for the ~~'''~~Drukpas~~'''~~ (Tibetan ''’brug pa''), ~~which is~~ a sub-order of the ~~Kagyupa~~ school ~~of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] prevailing in Bhutan~~. ~~However, the~~ term may derive from the Tibetan word dukpa (གདུག་པ, gdug pa), which refers to "any thing hurtful, or any injury, mischief, harm done." As an adjective, it means "noxious; mischievous, dangerous."<ref>Heinrich August Jäschke, ''A Tibetan-English Dictionary'' (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1998), 266.</ref>		'''Dugpa''', in Theosophical literature, is a term used generally as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "[[Brother of the Shadow]]."

			The origin of the term is not clear. At times it seems to be used for some sections of the Kagyupa school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] such as
			the Drukpas (Tibetan ''’brug pa''), a sub-order prevailing in Bhutan; and the Shamarpa lineage of the Karma Kagyu school.

			The term "dugpa" may also derive from the Tibetan word ''dukpa'' (གདུག་པ, ''gdug pa''), which refers to "any thing hurtful, or any injury, mischief, harm done." As an adjective, it means "noxious; mischievous, dangerous."<ref>Heinrich August Jäschke, ''A Tibetan-English Dictionary'' (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1998), 266.</ref>

			== General description ==
			In the [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)\|The Mahatma Letters]] the dugpas are frequently displayed as the enemies of the Masters and their disciples. For example, in [[Mahatma_Letter_No._131#Page 5\|one of his letters]] [[Koot Hoomi\|Master K.H.]] wrote to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett\|A. P. Sinnett]]:

			<blockquote>In our mountains here, the Dugpas lay at dangerous points, in paths frequented by our [[Chela\|Chelas]], bits of old rag, and other articles best calculated to attract the attention of the unwary, which have been impregnated with their evil magnetism. If one be stepped upon a tremendous psychic shock may be communicated to the wayfarer, so that he may lose his footing and fall down the precipice before he can recover himself. Friend, beware of Pride and Egoism, two of the worst snares for the feet of him who aspires to climb the high paths of Knowledge and Spirituality. You have opened a joint of your armour for the Dugpas — do not complain if they have found it out and wounded you there.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 131 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 436-437.</ref></blockquote>

	== Red hats ==		== Red hats ==
Line 6:		Line 16:
	<blockquote>Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.</ref></blockquote>

	Of the four main sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas'', who wear yellow hats. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the Shamarpas wear red. In fact, in Tibet the term "red hat" (''zhwa mar'') tends to be used specifically for the Shamarpa (zhwa dmar pa) lineage of the somewhat controversial Shamar Rinpoche. By "red hat" Blavatsky probably meant some Böns, Nyigmapas and ~~Shamarpas~~.		Of the four main sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas'', who wear yellow hats. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the Shamarpas wear red. In fact, in Tibet the term "red hat" (''zhwa mar'') tends to be used specifically for the Shamarpa (zhwa dmar pa) lineage of the somewhat controversial Shamar Rinpoche. Thus, by "red hat" Blavatsky probably meant some Böns, Nyigmapas, Shamarpas and Drukpas (see below).

	In the [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)\|The Mahatma Letters]] the dugpas are frequently displayed as the enemies of the Masters and their disciples. For example, in [[Mahatma_Letter_No._131#Page 5\|one of his letters]] [[Koot Hoomi\|Master K.H.]] wrote to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett\|A. P. Sinnett]]:		== Drukpa school ==

	<blockquote>In our mountains here, the Dugpas lay at dangerous points, in paths frequented by our [[Chela\|Chelas]], bits of old rag, and other articles best calculated to attract the attention of the unwary, which have been impregnated with their evil magnetism. If one be stepped upon a tremendous psychic shock may be communicated to the wayfarer, so that he may lose his footing and fall down the precipice before he can recover himself. Friend, beware of Pride and Egoism, two of the worst snares for the feet of him who aspires to climb the high paths of Knowledge and Spirituality. You have opened a joint of your armour for the Dugpas — do not complain if they have found it out and wounded you there.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 131 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 436-437.</ref></blockquote>

	== Drukpa ~~Lineage~~ ==

	The word "dugpa" was frequently used by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Mme. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom\|Masters]] in a generic sense to refer to the "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and the pre-Buddhist natives Böns. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>		The word "dugpa" was frequently used by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Mme. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom\|Masters]] in a generic sense to refer to the "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and the pre-Buddhist natives Böns. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>
Line 18:		Line 24:
	Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and Shammars in Bhutan:		Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and Shammars in Bhutan:

	<blockquote>The "Dug-pa~~'''~~(*)~~'''~~ or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines — into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.		<blockquote>The "Dug-pa(*) or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines — into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.<br>
			(*) The term "Dug-pa" in Tibet is deprecatory. They themselves pronounce it "Dög-pa" from the root to "bind" (religious binders to the old faith): while the paramount sect — the Gyeluk-pa (yellow caps) — and the people, use the word in the sense of "Dug-pa" mischief-makers, sorcerers. The Bhootanese are generally called Dug-pa throughout Tibet and even in some parts of Northern India.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 9-10.</ref></blockquote>
	~~'''~~(*)~~'''~~ The term "Dug-pa" in Tibet is deprecatory. They themselves pronounce it "Dög-pa" from the root to "bind" (religious binders to the old faith): while the paramount sect — the Gyeluk-pa (yellow caps) — and the people, use the word in the sense of "Dug-pa" mischief-makers, sorcerers. The Bhootanese are generally called Dug-pa throughout Tibet and even in some parts of Northern India.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 9-10.</ref></blockquote>

	However, even this reference to this particular Bhutanese sect should not be taken in a too general way. In reference to the [[Brothers of the Shadow]], Mme. Blavatsky wrote:		However, even this reference to this particular Bhutanese sect should not be taken in a too general way. In reference to the [[Brothers of the Shadow]], Mme. Blavatsky wrote:
Line 26:		Line 31:
	<blockquote>In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yellow-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong. And here we must beg the reader not to misunderstand us. For though the whole of Bhûtan and Sikkim belongs to the old religion of the Bhons, now known generally as the Dug-pas, we do not mean to have it understood that the whole of the population is possessed, en masse, or that they are all sorcerers. Among them are found as good men as anywhere else, and we speak above only of the élite of their Lamaseries, of a nucleus of priests, "devil-dancers," and fetish worshippers, whose dreadful and mysterious rites are utterly unknown to the greater part of the population.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. VI (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1989), 198.</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yellow-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong. And here we must beg the reader not to misunderstand us. For though the whole of Bhûtan and Sikkim belongs to the old religion of the Bhons, now known generally as the Dug-pas, we do not mean to have it understood that the whole of the population is possessed, en masse, or that they are all sorcerers. Among them are found as good men as anywhere else, and we speak above only of the élite of their Lamaseries, of a nucleus of priests, "devil-dancers," and fetish worshippers, whose dreadful and mysterious rites are utterly unknown to the greater part of the population.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. VI (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1989), 198.</ref></blockquote>

	== ~~Shammar~~ ==		== Shammarpa Lineage ==

	Tibetan word '''shamar''' (ཞྭ་དམར ''zhwa dmar'') means "red hat." When [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Blavatsky]] regarded them as an offshoot of the Böns:		Tibetan word '''shamar''' (ཞྭ་དམར ''zhwa dmar'') means "red hat." When [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Blavatsky]] regarded them as an offshoot of the Böns:

Pablo Sender: /* Drukpa Lineage */

2021-02-11T17:27:42Z

Drukpa Lineage

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 11 February 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The word "dugpa" was frequently used by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Mme. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom\|Masters]] in a generic sense to refer to the "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and the pre-Buddhist natives Böns. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>		The word "dugpa" was frequently used by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Mme. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom\|Masters]] in a generic sense to refer to the "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and the pre-Buddhist natives Böns. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>

	Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and ~~[[Dugpa#Shammar\|~~Shammars]] in Bhutan:		Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and Shammars in Bhutan:

	<blockquote>The "Dug-pa'''(*)''' or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines — into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.		<blockquote>The "Dug-pa'''(*)''' or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines — into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.

Pablo Sender at 17:15, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T17:15:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 11 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Dugpa''', in Theosophical literature, is a term used generally as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "[[Brother of the Shadow]]." The origin of the term is not clear. Sometimes it seems to be used for the '''Drukpas''' (Tibetan ''’brug pa''), which is a sub-order of the Kagyupa school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] prevailing in Bhutan. However, the term may derive from the Tibetan word dukpa (གདུག་པ, gdug pa), which refers to "any thing hurtful, or any injury, mischief, harm done." As an adjective, it means "noxious; mischievous, dangerous."<ref>Heinrich August Jäschke, ''A Tibetan-English Dictionary'' (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1998), 266.</ref>		'''Dugpa''', in Theosophical literature, is a term used generally as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "[[Brother of the Shadow]]." The origin of the term is not clear. Sometimes it seems to be used for the '''Drukpas''' (Tibetan ''’brug pa''), which is a sub-order of the Kagyupa school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] prevailing in Bhutan. However, the term may derive from the Tibetan word dukpa (གདུག་པ, gdug pa), which refers to "any thing hurtful, or any injury, mischief, harm done." As an adjective, it means "noxious; mischievous, dangerous."<ref>Heinrich August Jäschke, ''A Tibetan-English Dictionary'' (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1998), 266.</ref>

	== ~~General description~~ ==		== Red hats ==
	[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Mme. Blavatsky]] wrote:		[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Mme. Blavatsky]] wrote:

	<blockquote>Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.</ref></blockquote>

	Of the four main sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas''. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats~~. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the [[Dugpa#Shmmars\|Shamarpas]] wear red~~. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. ~~The Gelugpas~~ wear ~~yellow~~ hats. ~~Therefore~~, by "red hat" Blavatsky probably meant some Böns, Nyigmapas and Shamarpas.		Of the four main sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas'', who wear yellow hats. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the Shamarpas wear red. In fact, in Tibet the term "red hat" (''zhwa mar'') tends to be used specifically for the Shamarpa (zhwa dmar pa) lineage of the somewhat controversial Shamar Rinpoche. By "red hat" Blavatsky probably meant some Böns, Nyigmapas and Shamarpas.

	In the [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)\|The Mahatma Letters]] the dugpas are frequently displayed as the enemies of the Masters and their disciples. For example, in [[Mahatma_Letter_No._131#Page 5\|one of his letters]] [[Koot Hoomi\|Master K.H.]] wrote to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett\|A. P. Sinnett]]:		In the [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)\|The Mahatma Letters]] the dugpas are frequently displayed as the enemies of the Masters and their disciples. For example, in [[Mahatma_Letter_No._131#Page 5\|one of his letters]] [[Koot Hoomi\|Master K.H.]] wrote to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett\|A. P. Sinnett]]:

Pablo Sender at 16:57, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T16:57:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 11 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Dugpa''' or '''~~Drukpa~~''' (Tibetan ''’brug pa'') is a sub-order of the Kagyupa school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], prevailing in Bhutan. ~~In Theosophical literature~~, the term "~~dugpa~~" ~~is used in a more general way by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|H. P. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom]] as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer~~, ~~frequently referred to as~~ "~~[[Brother of the Shadow]]~~".		'''Dugpa''', in Theosophical literature, is a term used generally as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "[[Brother of the Shadow]]." The origin of the term is not clear. Sometimes it seems to be used for the '''Drukpas''' (Tibetan ''’brug pa''), which is a sub-order of the Kagyupa school of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] prevailing in Bhutan. However, the term may derive from the Tibetan word dukpa (གདུག་པ, gdug pa), which refers to "any thing hurtful, or any injury, mischief, harm done." As an adjective, it means "noxious; mischievous, dangerous."<ref>Heinrich August Jäschke, ''A Tibetan-English Dictionary'' (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1998), 266.</ref>

	== General description ==		== General description ==

SysopJ at 16:43, 12 July 2020

2020-07-12T16:43:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 12 July 2020
Line 51:		Line 51:
	The Dug-pa clan, then, is not quite so bad as it has been painted. They are Buddhists, with nature-worship super-imposed. This old worship, its enemies say, included animal sacrifices, and even human sacrifices at one time.<ref>Charles Webster Leadbeater, ''Talks on the Path of Occultism'' Volume 2, (Adyar, Madras: The Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), ???.</ref>		The Dug-pa clan, then, is not quite so bad as it has been painted. They are Buddhists, with nature-worship super-imposed. This old worship, its enemies say, included animal sacrifices, and even human sacrifices at one time.<ref>Charles Webster Leadbeater, ''Talks on the Path of Occultism'' Volume 2, (Adyar, Madras: The Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), ???.</ref>
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

			== Use in popular culture ==

			Dugpa is not at all widely used in Western culture. However, the very popular television program '''''Twin Peaks''''' used the term in its second season to describe a society of evil sorcerers called the Black Lodge. Dugpas were also compared to worshippers of the goddess Kali in India.<ref>[https://twinpeaks.fandom.com/wiki/Dugpa "Dugpa"] in Twin Peaks fan wiki. The reference to dugpas took place in Season 2, Episode 27. Accessed July 12, 2020.</ref><ref>Other references are in fan websites [http://www.dugpa.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=3 Dugpa.com] and [https://welcometotwinpeaks.com/discuss/twin-peaks-part-8/dugpas-and-woodsmen/ WelcometoTwinPeaks.com], and in fanzine ''Wrapped in Plastic''.</ref>

			Micah Harris wrote a murder mystery called ''Ravenwood Stepson of Mystery: Return of the Dugpa''. There are some Reddits and Pinterests using the term.

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==
Line 57:		Line 63:
	==Online resources==		==Online resources==
	===Articles===		===Articles===
	* [https://theosophy.world/encyclopedia/dugpa Dugpa] at Theosophy World		* [https://theosophy.world/encyclopedia/dugpa "Dugpa"] at Theosophy World.
	*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1315# Harry Potter and Dugpa] by John Algeo		*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1315# "Harry Potter and Dugpa"] by John Algeo. Originally published in ''The Quest'' 95.4 (July-August, 2007), 135-139.
	*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/ReincarnationsInTibet.htm# Reincarnations in Tibet] by H. P. Blavatsky		*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/ReincarnationsInTibet.htm# "Reincarnations in Tibet"] by H. P. Blavatsky.
	*[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings?] by David Reigle		*[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# "Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings?"] by David Reigle.


	[[Category:Buddhist concepts]]		[[Category:Buddhist concepts]]
	[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]		[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]

Michael Conlin: /* Articles */

2020-04-08T18:31:44Z

Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 8 April 2020
Line 57:		Line 57:
	==Online resources==		==Online resources==
	===Articles===		===Articles===
	*[~~http~~://~~www.~~theosophy.ph/~~encyclo~~/~~index.php?title=Dugpa#~~ Dugpa] at ~~Theosopedia~~		* [https://theosophy.world/encyclopedia/dugpa Dugpa] at Theosophy World
	*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1315# Harry Potter and Dugpa] by John Algeo		*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1315# Harry Potter and Dugpa] by John Algeo
	*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/ReincarnationsInTibet.htm# Reincarnations in Tibet] by H. P. Blavatsky		*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/ReincarnationsInTibet.htm# Reincarnations in Tibet] by H. P. Blavatsky

SysopJ at 13:27, 9 October 2019

2019-10-09T13:27:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 9 October 2019
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and [[Dugpa#Shammar\|Shammars]] in Bhutan:		Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and [[Dugpa#Shammar\|Shammars]] in Bhutan:

	<blockquote>The "Dug-pa'''(*)''' or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines--into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.~~<br><br>~~		<blockquote>The "Dug-pa'''(*)''' or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines — into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.
	'''(*)''' The term "Dug-pa" in Tibet is deprecatory. They themselves pronounce it "Dög-pa" from the root to "bind" (religious binders to the old faith): while the paramount sect--the Gyeluk-pa (yellow caps)--and the people, use the word in the sense of "Dug-pa" mischief-makers, sorcerers. The Bhootanese are generally called Dug-pa throughout Tibet and even in some parts of Northern India.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 9-10.</ref></blockquote>
			'''(*)''' The term "Dug-pa" in Tibet is deprecatory. They themselves pronounce it "Dög-pa" from the root to "bind" (religious binders to the old faith): while the paramount sect — the Gyeluk-pa (yellow caps) — and the people, use the word in the sense of "Dug-pa" mischief-makers, sorcerers. The Bhootanese are generally called Dug-pa throughout Tibet and even in some parts of Northern India.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 9-10.</ref></blockquote>

	However, even this reference to this particular Bhutanese sect should not be taken in a too general way. In reference to the [[Brothers of the Shadow]], Mme. Blavatsky wrote:		However, even this reference to this particular Bhutanese sect should not be taken in a too general way. In reference to the [[Brothers of the Shadow]], Mme. Blavatsky wrote:
Line 29:		Line 30:
	Tibetan word '''shamar''' (ཞྭ་དམར ''zhwa dmar'') means "red hat." When [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Blavatsky]] regarded them as an offshoot of the Böns:		Tibetan word '''shamar''' (ཞྭ་དམར ''zhwa dmar'') means "red hat." When [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky\|Blavatsky]] regarded them as an offshoot of the Böns:

	<blockquote>The Shammar sect is not, as wrongly supposed, a kind of corrupted Buddhism, but an offshoot of the Bön ~~religion—itself~~ a degenerated remnant of the Chaldean mysteries of old, now a religion entirely based upon necromancy, sorcery and sooth-saying. The introduction of Buddha’s name in it means nothing.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 15, fn.</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>The Shammar sect is not, as wrongly supposed, a kind of corrupted Buddhism, but an offshoot of the Bön religion — itself a degenerated remnant of the Chaldean mysteries of old, now a religion entirely based upon necromancy, sorcery and sooth-saying. The introduction of Buddha’s name in it means nothing.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 15, fn.</ref></blockquote>

	There are references to this use of the term in the 19th century. For example, in a book on the history of Hindustan we find:		There are references to this use of the term in the 19th century. For example, in a book on the history of Hindustan we find:
Line 43:		Line 44:
	== C. W. Leabeteater's view ==		== C. W. Leabeteater's view ==

	<blockquote>All through her writings Madame Blavatsky applies the name Dugpa to the brothers of the shadow – black magicians, as we often call them. Perhaps it is rather an unfortunate name to have chosen, because the dugpas do not quite deserve all the hard things she has said about them.~~<br>~~		<blockquote>All through her writings Madame Blavatsky applies the name Dugpa to the brothers of the shadow – black magicians, as we often call them. Perhaps it is rather an unfortunate name to have chosen, because the dugpas do not quite deserve all the hard things she has said about them.

	In Tibet, before Buddhism penetrated that land, there was much worship of elementals and nature-spirits, and offerings of a propitiatory character were regularly made to them. The religion was on a low level, as all religions of a propitiatory nature must be. “The Bhons and Dugpas,” says Madame Blavatsky, “and the various sects of the ‘Redcaps’, are regarded as the most versed in sorcery. They inhabit Western and Little Tibet and Bhutan.” The old religion thus still lives. . . .<br>		In Tibet, before Buddhism penetrated that land, there was much worship of elementals and nature-spirits, and offerings of a propitiatory character were regularly made to them. The religion was on a low level, as all religions of a propitiatory nature must be. “The Bhons and Dugpas,” says Madame Blavatsky, “and the various sects of the ‘Redcaps’, are regarded as the most versed in sorcery. They inhabit Western and Little Tibet and Bhutan.” The old religion thus still lives. . . .<br>
	The Bhon-pa are the followers of the aboriginal religion. The descendants of the converts made by the first mission are called Ninma-pa. That first incursion of Buddhism rapidly became corrupted by the old faith. The Kargyu sect represents the converts of the second mission, which was sent to Tibet some centuries later than the first. The Dug-pa, or Red-caps, belong to this sect, and so are two removes from the Bhon-pa. It also became impure, and allowed the old beliefs to creep in. . . .~~<br>~~		The Bhon-pa are the followers of the aboriginal religion. The descendants of the converts made by the first mission are called Ninma-pa. That first incursion of Buddhism rapidly became corrupted by the old faith. The Kargyu sect represents the converts of the second mission, which was sent to Tibet some centuries later than the first. The Dug-pa, or Red-caps, belong to this sect, and so are two removes from the Bhon-pa. It also became impure, and allowed the old beliefs to creep in. . . .
	The Dug-pa clan, then, is not quite so bad as it has been painted. They are Buddhists, with nature-worship super-imposed. This old worship, its enemies say, included animal sacrifices, and even human sacrifices at one time.<ref>Charles Webster Leadbeater, ''Talks on the Path of Occultism'' Volume 2, (Adyar, Madras: The Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), ???.</ref></blockquote>
			The Dug-pa clan, then, is not quite so bad as it has been painted. They are Buddhists, with nature-worship super-imposed. This old worship, its enemies say, included animal sacrifices, and even human sacrifices at one time.<ref>Charles Webster Leadbeater, ''Talks on the Path of Occultism'' Volume 2, (Adyar, Madras: The Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), ???.</ref>
			</blockquote>

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==