Mahatma Letter No. 109: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Category:ML transcripts notes]]
[[Category:ML transcripts notes]]
[[Category:ML needs context, commentary]]
[[Category:ML needs context, commentary]]
[[Category:ML from Koot Hoomi]]


'''This is Letter No. 119 in Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 109#Context and background|Context and background]].
'''This is Letter No. 119 in Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 109#Context and background|Context and background]].

Revision as of 01:44, 14 April 2012


This is Letter No. 119 in Barker numbering. See below for Context and background.

< Prev letter chrono  Next letter chrono >   < Prev letter Barker  Next letter Barker >

Page 1 transcription, image, and notes

Give Mr. Sinnett my salams — and ask him to comment upon the slip enclosed. He may know what I mean him to write upon the subject editorially. Tell him also that time is short and precious and ought not to be wasted.

K. H.

NOTES:

Page 2

The following may lead later on to a curious confirmation of our "obscuration" doctrine which so puzzles my friend — the Editor of the "Phoenix."

Will you kindly and likewise, comment upon it and oblige thereby,

Yours,

K. H.

NEWSPAPER CUTTING

Sir John Lubbock's opinion confirms or endorses the conclusion long since put forth by some of the most eminent astronomers, namely, that there are now in the solar system, or firmament, many dark bodies — that is, bodies which now emit no light, or comparatively little. He points out, for example, that in the case of Procyon the existence of an invisible body is demonstrated by the movement of the visible stars. Another illustration which he cites relates to the notable phenomena presented by Algow, the bright star in the Head of Medusa. This star shines without change for two days and thirteen hours; then, in three hours and a half, dwindles from a star of the second to one of the fourth magnitude; and then, in another three and a half hours, resumes its original brilliancy. According to the view entertained by Professor Lubbock, these changes must be regarded as indicating the presence of an opaque body, which intercepts at regular intervals a part of the light emitted by Algow.

NOTES:

Context and background

Physical description of letter

Publication history

Commentary about this letter

Notes


Additional resources