Difference between revisions of "Mahatma Letter No. 109"

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:ML needs images]]
+
[[Category:ML from Koot Hoomi]]  
[[Category:ML needs transcriptions proofread, links added]]
+
[[Category:ML needs background]]
[[Category:ML needs Quick Facts]]
+
[[Category:ML needs physical description]]
[[Category:ML needs prev/next buttons]]
+
[[Category:ML needs publication history]]
[[Category:ML transcripts notes]]
+
[[Category:ML needs commentary]]
[[Category:ML needs context, commentary]]
+
{{Infobox MLbox
[[Category:ML from Koot Hoomi]]
+
| header1 = People involved |
 
+
| writtenby        = [[Koot Hoomi]]
 +
| receivedby        = [[Damodar K. Mavalankar|Damodar]] or [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|H. P. Blavatsky]]
 +
| sentvia          = unknown
 +
| header2 = Dates
 +
| writtendate      = unknown
 +
| receiveddate      = probably March 1883 - see [[Mahatma Letter No. 109#Context and background|below]]
 +
| otherdate        = none
 +
| header3 = Places
 +
| sentfrom          = unknown
 +
| receivedat        = probably [[Madras, India]]
 +
| vialocation      = none
 +
}}
 
'''This is Letter No. 119 in Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 109#Context and background|Context and background]].
 
'''This is Letter No. 119 in Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 109#Context and background|Context and background]].
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 12: Line 23:
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 108|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter chrono]]</big>{{pad|3em}}
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 108|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter chrono]]</big>{{pad|3em}}
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 110|Next letter chrono'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big>{{pad|3em}}
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 110|Next letter chrono'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big>{{pad|3em}}
 +
<br>
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 80|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter Barker]]</big>{{pad|3em}}
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 80|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter Barker]]</big>{{pad|3em}}
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 51|Next letter Barker'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big>  
 
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 51|Next letter Barker'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big>  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
 
== Page 1 transcription, image, and notes ==
 
== Page 1 transcription, image, and notes ==
  

Revision as of 02:56, 27 June 2012

Quick Facts
People involved
Written by: Koot Hoomi
Received by: Damodar or H. P. Blavatsky
Sent via: unknown
Dates
Written on: unknown
Received on: probably March 1883 - see below
Other dates: none
Places
Sent from: unknown
Received at: probably Madras, India
Via: none

This is Letter No. 119 in Barker numbering. See below for Context and background.

< Prev letter chrono  Next letter chrono >  
< Prev letter Barker  Next letter Barker >

Page 1 transcription, image, and notes

Give Mr. Sinnett my salams — and ask him to comment upon the slip enclosed. He may know what I mean him to write upon the subject editorially. Tell him also that time is short and precious and ought not to be wasted.

K. H.

NOTES:

Page 2

The following may lead later on to a curious confirmation of our "obscuration" doctrine which so puzzles my friend — the Editor of the "Phoenix."

Will you kindly and likewise, comment upon it and oblige thereby,

Yours,

K. H.

NEWSPAPER CUTTING

Sir John Lubbock's opinion confirms or endorses the conclusion long since put forth by some of the most eminent astronomers, namely, that there are now in the solar system, or firmament, many dark bodies — that is, bodies which now emit no light, or comparatively little. He points out, for example, that in the case of Procyon the existence of an invisible body is demonstrated by the movement of the visible stars. Another illustration which he cites relates to the notable phenomena presented by Algow, the bright star in the Head of Medusa. This star shines without change for two days and thirteen hours; then, in three hours and a half, dwindles from a star of the second to one of the fourth magnitude; and then, in another three and a half hours, resumes its original brilliancy. According to the view entertained by Professor Lubbock, these changes must be regarded as indicating the presence of an opaque body, which intercepts at regular intervals a part of the light emitted by Algow.

NOTES:

Context and background

Physical description of letter

Publication history

Commentary about this letter

Notes


Additional resources