Vernon Harrison: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Template:Article needs expansion}} Harrison, Vernon Harrison, Vernon Harrison, Vernon") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Dr. Vernon Harrison.jpg|right|150px|thumb|Vernon Harrison]] | |||
'''Vernon George Wentworth Harrison''' ([[March 14]], 1912 in Warwickshire, [[October 14]], 2001) was a former president of the Royal Photographic Society, a member of the [[Society for Psychical Research]] (SPR), and a professional "research worker of disputed documents". | |||
In 1984 Harrison studied the various documents related to the "[[Hodgson Report]]". On [[May 8]], 1986, the SPR published his research, ''J'Accuse: An Examination of the Hodgson Report of 1885'' (revised by Harrison in 1997 after more research). Harrison ultimately concluded that the Hodgson Report was not scientifically sound, but was "flawed and untrustworthy," and "should be read with great caution, if not disregarded." | |||
== Notes == | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category:Scientists|Harrison, Vernon]] | [[Category:Scientists|Harrison, Vernon]] | ||
[[Category:Writers|Harrison, Vernon]] | [[Category:Writers|Harrison, Vernon]] | ||
[[Category:Nationality English|Harrison, Vernon]] | [[Category:Nationality English|Harrison, Vernon]] | ||
[[Category:People|Harrison, Vernon]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:45, 12 February 2018
Vernon George Wentworth Harrison (March 14, 1912 in Warwickshire, October 14, 2001) was a former president of the Royal Photographic Society, a member of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR), and a professional "research worker of disputed documents".
In 1984 Harrison studied the various documents related to the "Hodgson Report". On May 8, 1986, the SPR published his research, J'Accuse: An Examination of the Hodgson Report of 1885 (revised by Harrison in 1997 after more research). Harrison ultimately concluded that the Hodgson Report was not scientifically sound, but was "flawed and untrustworthy," and "should be read with great caution, if not disregarded."