View source for The "Elixir of Life"

'''The "Elixir of Life"''' is an article written by [[Godolphin Mitford]] and originally published in two installments in [[The Theosophist (periodical)|''The Theosophist'']] on March and April 1882.

== Publication history ==
* [[The Theosophist (periodical)|''The Theosophist'']] on March 1882, Part 1, pp. 140-142.  
* [[The Theosophist (periodical)|''The Theosophist'']] on April 1882, Part 2, 168-171. 
* "Five Years of Theosophy" (1885 edition) pp 1-32.

== Online publication ==
* The "Elixir of Life" in HTML format at [https://universaltheosophy.com/articles/the-elixir-of-life/#sdendnote2sym# Universal Theosophy] and [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/elixir.htm# Katinka Hesselink.Net]
* The "Elixir of Life" - From a Chela's Diary in PDF format at [https://cdn.website-editor.net/e4d6563c50794969b714ab70457d9761/files/uploaded/ElixirOfLife%2CThe_GM.pdf#the Canadian Theosophical Association website.]

== Repercussions ==
Some readers took exception of a number of remarks published in this article. This lead to the publication of the article [http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v6/y1884_039.htm# Is The Desire To Live Selfish?] by H. P. Blavatsky

== References in ''The Mahatma Letters'' ==
In [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)|''The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett'']] we find some references to this article.

In [[Mahatma Letter No. 49|Letter No. 49]] the [[Koot Hoomi|Mahatma K.H.]] tells [[Alfred Percy Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]]:

<blockquote>You will find in the forth-coming number, two articles which you must read, I need not tell you why, as I leave it with your intuitions. As usual, it is an indiscretion, which however, I have allowed to remain as there are few, if any, who will understand the hint contained — but you. There are more than one such hint though; hence your attention is asked to the “Elixir of Life” and W. Oxley’s “Philosophy of Spirit.” The former contains references and explanations, the haziness of which may remind you of a man who stealthily approaching one gives him a hit upon his back, and then runs away; as they most undeniably belong to the genus of those “Fortunes” that come to one like the thief by night and during one’s sleep, and go back, finding no one to respond to the offer — of which you complain in your letter to Brother. This time, you are warned, good friend, so complain no more.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 49 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 137.</ref></blockquote>

In [[Mahatma Letter No. 74|Letter No. 74]] Master K.H. refers to the article in answer to [[Allan Octavian Hume|Mr. Hume]], who had been complaining about Master [[Morya|M.]]'s "anger":

<blockquote>Would you think more of him, were he to conceal his anger; to lie to himself and the outsiders, and so permit them to credit him with a virtue he has not? If it is a meritorious act to extirpate with the roots all feelings of anger, so as to never feel the slightest paroxysm of a passion we all consider sinful, it is a still greater sin with us to pretend that it is so extirpated. Please read over the "Elixir of Life" No. 2 (April, p. 169 col. 1, paras. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). And yet in the ideas of the West, everything is brought down to appearances even in religion.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 74 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 224.</ref></blockquote>

The fragment referred to by the Master is the following: 

<blockquote>And it may be mentioned that all sense of restraint—even if self-imposed—is useless. Not only is all "goodness" that results from the compulsion of physical force, threats, or bribes (whether of a physical or so-called "spiritual" nature) absolutely useless to the person who exhibits it, its hypocrisy tending to poison the moral atmosphere of the world, but the desire to be “good” or “pure,” to be efficacious must be spontaneous. It must be a self-impulse from within, a real preference for something higher, not an abstention from vice because of fear of the law: not a chastity enforced by the dread of Public Opinion; not a benevolence exercised through love of praise or dread of consequences in a hypothetical Future Life.<br>
. . .<br>
Nor is it of any use for this particular purpose of longevity to abstain from immorality so long as you are craving for it in your heart; and so on with all other unsatisfied inward cravings. To get rid of the inward desire is the essential thing, and to mimic the real thing without it is barefaced hypocrisy and useless slavery.</blockquote>

==Online resources==
===Articles===
*[https://universaltheosophy.com/articles/hpb/is-the-desire-to-live-selfish/# Is the Desire to “Live” Selfish?] H. P. Blavatsky
*[https://universaltheosophy.com/articles/damodar/contemplation/ Contemplation] by Damodar Mavalankar

== Notes ==
<references/>

[[Category:Articles and Pamphlets|Elixir of Life, The]]