Dugpa: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
As we can see, the word "dugpa" is used here in a generic sense to refer to all "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], that is, the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', ''Sakyapas'', and the pre-Buddhist natives ''Bhons''. These are the non-reformed sects that did not follow Tsongkhapa’s new order, the ''Gelugpas''. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa, which became the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan.<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>
As we can see, the word "dugpa" is used here in a generic sense to refer to all "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], that is, the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', ''Sakyapas'', and the pre-Buddhist natives ''Bhons''. These are the non-reformed sects that did not follow Tsongkhapa’s new order, the ''Gelugpas''. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa, which became the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan.<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>


Although the non-reformed sects do not impose the preventive rules created by Tsongkhapa, this does not mean they are all black magicians. Even within the particular sect of the dugpas in Bhutan this is not the case. In talking about the [[Brothers of the Shadow]] [[H. P. Blavatsky|Mme. Blavatsky]] wrote:
Although the non-reformed sects do not impose the preventive rules created by Tsongkhapa, this does not mean they are all black magicians. Even within the particular sect of the dugpas in Bhutan this is not the case. In reference to the [[Brothers of the Shadow]] [[H. P. Blavatsky|Mme. Blavatsky]] wrote:


<blockquote>In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yellow-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong. And here we must beg the reader not to misunderstand us. For though the whole of Bhûtan and Sikkim belongs to the old religion of the Bhons, now known generally as the Dug-pas, we do not mean to have it understood that the whole of the population is possessed, en masse, or that they are all sorcerers. Among them are found as good men as anywhere else, and we speak above only of the élite of their Lamaseries, of a nucleus of priests, "devil-dancers," and fetish worshippers, whose dreadful and mysterious rites are utterly unknown to the greater part of the population.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. VI (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1989), 197-198.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yellow-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong. And here we must beg the reader not to misunderstand us. For though the whole of Bhûtan and Sikkim belongs to the old religion of the Bhons, now known generally as the Dug-pas, we do not mean to have it understood that the whole of the population is possessed, en masse, or that they are all sorcerers. Among them are found as good men as anywhere else, and we speak above only of the élite of their Lamaseries, of a nucleus of priests, "devil-dancers," and fetish worshippers, whose dreadful and mysterious rites are utterly unknown to the greater part of the population.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. VI (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1989), 197-198.</ref></blockquote>

Revision as of 17:02, 16 May 2012

Dugpa (Tib. ’brug pa) is a word used by H. P. Blavatsky and the Mahatmas as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "Brother of the Shadow":

Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.[1]

As we can see, the word "dugpa" is used here in a generic sense to refer to all "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of Tibetan Buddhism, that is, the Nyigmapas, Kagyupas, Sakyapas, and the pre-Buddhist natives Bhons. These are the non-reformed sects that did not follow Tsongkhapa’s new order, the Gelugpas. As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time.[2] This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism, where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa, which became the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan.[3]

Although the non-reformed sects do not impose the preventive rules created by Tsongkhapa, this does not mean they are all black magicians. Even within the particular sect of the dugpas in Bhutan this is not the case. In reference to the Brothers of the Shadow Mme. Blavatsky wrote:

In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yellow-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong. And here we must beg the reader not to misunderstand us. For though the whole of Bhûtan and Sikkim belongs to the old religion of the Bhons, now known generally as the Dug-pas, we do not mean to have it understood that the whole of the population is possessed, en masse, or that they are all sorcerers. Among them are found as good men as anywhere else, and we speak above only of the élite of their Lamaseries, of a nucleus of priests, "devil-dancers," and fetish worshippers, whose dreadful and mysterious rites are utterly unknown to the greater part of the population.[4]

Notes

  1. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Theosophical Glossary (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.
  2. Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle
  3. Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.
  4. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Collected Writings vol. VI (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1989), 197-198.

Further reading