Vegetarianism: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=== Theosophical reasons for vegetarianism === | === Theosophical reasons for vegetarianism === | ||
''Interconnection with other Kingdoms of Nature'' | ''Interconnection with other Kingdoms of Nature'' |
Revision as of 16:25, 5 July 2012
Vegetarianism is the practice of consuming plant-based foods and, depending on the type of vegetarianism, animal foods which were not obtained from the slaughter of animals.
Many types of vegetarians exist including lacto-ovo vegetarians, ovo vegetarians, vegans, raw food vegans, and others. Lacto-ovo vegetarians eat eggs and dairy products in addition to plant-based foods, while ovo vegetarians only eat eggs and plant based foods. Some vegetarians exclude all animal products including eggs, dairy, and animal-derived food ingredients; individuals abstaining from all animal products are considered vegans. Raw food vegans only consume uncooked vegan foods.
History
The origins of vegetarianism are uncertain, however, vegetarianism was practiced as early as 3200 B.C.E. by various ancient Egyptian religious groups. Other ancient philosophies also embraced vegetarianism, including Hinduism, Zoroasterianism, Jainism, and Brahmanism. Central to the beliefs of these ancient philosophies were the ideas of non-violence and respect for all life. Vegetarianism was also prominent in ancient Greece and was advocated by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Pythagoras believed that vegetarianism was important for peaceful human interaction because slaughtering animals damaged the soul. Many parallels exist between the beliefs of ancient vegetarians and modern vegetarians.[1]
Health reasons
The China Study (a massive epidemiological study was performed on populations in China) revealed that great differences in the prevalence of disease existed between areas which consumed animal products and areas which did not. As animal product consumption approaches zero, a dramatic decrease in cancer and other Western disease occurs. When strictly vegan, cancer and heart attacks, two of the leading causes of death in Westernized society, are nearly nonexistant. Even slight consumption of animal products is associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of disease. Animal products are either low in or do not contain nutrients which protect against cancer such as antioxidants, fiber, phytochemicals, folate, vitamin E, and vegetable protein. Compounding this problem, animal products contain large amounts of cancer causing substances including saturated fat, IGF-1, arachidonic acid, and cholesterol.[2]
Cancer is not the only disease influenced by animal products. Coronary heart disease directly increases with the consumption of animal protein, and decreases as consumption of legume and vegetable protein increases. A strong correlation exists between vegetable and fruit consumption and general health.[3]
Ecological reasons
In 2006, a United Nations investigation found that raising livestock is one of the most damaging industries for the environment.[4] Livestock production uses 26 percent of all arable land for grazing, and food for industrial livestock takes up an additional 1/3. Combined, livestock production uses more than half of all the available farmland on the planet, land which could be used to support at least 8 times as many people, possibly as much as 54 times, if it were used to grow grain crops.[5] In the U.S., 70% of all arable land is used to raise livestock.[6]
Grasslands and tropical forests are being destroyed at a rapid rate in order to increase available land for livestock feed and production. This deforestation and destruction contributes greatly to a loss of biodiversity. Additionally, the pollution, especially toxic runoff into water systems, causes great environmental damage. For instance, toxic runoff from industrial livestock production contributes significantly to the deadzone in the Gulf of Mexico. The deadzone encompasses 8000 square miles of water in which there is too little oxygen for any significant life to survive. Further, livestock production accounts for 37% of methane emmissions, 65% of nitrous oxide emmisions, and 9% of all CO2 emmissions. Methane is a far more potent greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide.[7]
Theosophists and vegetarianism
Anna Kingsford was an early advocate of vegetarianism, graduating from a Paris university in 1880, one of the first women to graduate with a doctorate in medicine, so that she could argue for vegetarianism with more credibility. Her beliefs were very much in accordance with Theosophy, and she became president of the London Lodge of the Theosophical Society in 1883.
Dr. Kingsford said, "What right have I, I asked myself, thus to ill-treat a creature simply because it has a form which differs from my own?" Her belief was that as creatures more evolved from beasts, we should uphold a corresponding, higher moral quality of truthfulness, love, sympathy, and friendship. She believed that being human in form is less important than being human in spirit, and that as higher creatures, we should not mistreat and kill needlessly other creatures. Much like other prominent Theosophists, she believed that ultimately speaking, all creatures are one.
Dr. Annie Besant was also an important advocate of vegetarianism. The souvenir book produced for the 1957 International Vegetarian Union Congress features some of her writings under "History of Vegetarianism."[8]
Theosophical reasons for vegetarianism
Interconnection with other Kingdoms of Nature
Life, of all variety, is one, and animals are humanity's less evolved siblings. Being in a position of power, humans should aid creatures lower in the chain of evolution, as opposed to causing them pain and misery. According to Theosophy we are all connected, not only with other human beings but with the whole planet and also with the universe. If a person is to advance, and grow, he cannot be isolated from the rest of the world. Eventually, the pain, and disharmony of others, not as advanced, will hinder his progress. Besant writes, “The misery that you cause is, as it were, mire that clings round your feet when you would ascend; for we have to rise together or to fall together, and all the misery we inflict on sentient beings slackens our human evolution, and makes the progress of humanity slower towards the ideal that it is seeking to realize.” When animals are slaughtered, filled with pain and fear, they send out a powerful, negative vibration into the astral world which subsequently influences the material world. Any person that comes near these vibrations is also influenced by them, the sensitive being especially susceptible. About these negative vibrations Annie Besant writes, “This continual throwing down of these magnetic influences of fear, of horror, and of anger, and passion, and revenge, works on the people amongst whom they play, and tends to coarsen, tends to degrade, tends to pollute.” Leadbeater explains it similarly, stating that the pain and terror inflicted upon the animals, butchered for our consumption, is creating unseen, yet strong, forces which negatively affect us and our children, creating an atmosphere of fear and terror. Avoiding meat is better for the world as a whole, even if myopically it is better for an individual to consume it. Inevitably, the growth of an individual is dependent on the growth of the world as a whole. The poet P. J. Bailey writes, “Pain to life is pain to Nature's Soul, and any needless death is a deadly sin.”
The building of the subtle bodies
Leadbeater explains that the body is the vehicle for the soul, and needs to be kept in as best of a condition as possible so that it is easier to develop the higher, more important aspects of our nature. An impure diet makes it more difficult for the soul to use its senses, and Leadbeater explains that anything which makes our path more difficult should be avoided. Annie Besant wrote: “As we carry on the purification of the physical body by feeding it on clean food and drink and by excluding from our diet the polluting blood and flesh of animals, alcohol and other things that are foul and degrading, we also begin to purify the astral vehicle and take from the astral world more delicate and fine materials for its construction. The effect of this is not only important as regards the present Earth Life, but it has a distinct bearing also on the post-mortem state on our condition in the astral world, and on the kind of body we shall have in the next life upon earth. As the astral body is the vehicle of the emotions and passions, it follows that a man whose astral body is of the ruder type will be chiefly amenable to the lower and rougher varieties of passion and emotion; where as a man who has a fine astral body will find that its particles most readily vibrate in response to higher and more refined emotions and aspirations.”
Responsibility
Although animals are not necessarily being killed directly by meat-eaters, the people eating meat are still responsible for the “Deterioration in the moral character of the men on whom we throw this work of slaughtering”. Geoffrey Hodson explains that forcing people to work in the meat processing industry is cruel. The industry causes people to lose their appreciation for life, and tends to derail their spiritual and cultural progress. According to Annie Besant, an ethical rule is that no person should force another person to perform some duty that he or she is not willing to perform his or her self. If a person wants to eat meat, they should do the killing themselves. Leadbeater strongly agrees with this sentiment, writing "It is universally recognized in law that qui facit per alium, facit per se--whatsoever a man does through another, he does himself."
Notes
- ↑ World History of Vegetarianism by Vegetarian Society.
- ↑ Joel Fuhrman, Eat to Live: The Revolutionary Formula for Fast and Sustained Weight Loss (New York: Little, Brown and Co., [2005]), 70.
- ↑ Joel Fuhrman, Eat to Live: The Revolutionary Formula for Fast and Sustained Weight Loss New York: Little, Brown and Co., [2005]), 71.
- ↑ Livestock a major threat to environment by Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN
- ↑ Science News by Cornell University: "U.S. could feed 800 million people with grain that livestock eat, Cornell ecologist advises animal scientists."
- ↑ Marlow Vesterby et al., Major Uses of Land in the United States, Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Statistical Bulletin No. 973.
- ↑ Harmful Environmental Effects Of Livestock Production On The Planet Increasingly Serious at ScienceDaily.
- ↑ History of Vegetarianism by International Vegetarian Union (IVU).
Further reading
- Triad at Theosopedia