Isis Unveiled (book): Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== Isis on Reincarnation == | |||
Controversy aroused in the 1880's when the teachings of reincarnation was taught by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|Mme. Blavatsky]] and her [[Adept]] teachers because the concept had been previously rejected in ''Isis Unveiled'': | |||
<blockquote>Reincarnation, i.e., the appearance of the same individual, or rather of his astral monad, twice on the same planet, is not a rule in nature; it is an exception.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Isis Unveiled'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 351.</ref></blockquote> | |||
However, in the light of later teachings, it is obvious that the author was not referring to the reincarnation of the [[Ego#Higher Ego|Higher ego]], but to that of the personality, which only happens in exceptional cases: | |||
<blockquote>It is preceded by a violation of the laws of harmony of nature, and happens only when the latter, seeking to restore its disturbed equilibrium, violently throws back into earth-life the astral monad which had been tossed out of the circle of necessity by crime or accident. Thus, in cases of abortion, of infants dying before a certain age, and of congenital and incurable idiocy, nature’s original design to produce a perfect human being, has been interrupted. Therefore, while the gross matter of each of these several entities is suffered to disperse itself at death, through the vast realm of being, the immortal spirit and astral monad of the individual — the latter having been set apart to animate a frame and the former to shed its divine light on the corporeal organization — must try a second time to carry out the purpose of the creative intelligence.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Isis Unveiled'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 351.</ref></blockquote> | |||
However, it was recognized by the [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters]] that those passages can be misleading. [[Morya|Master M.]] wrote to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett|Mr. Sinnet]]: | |||
<blockquote>By-the-bye, I’ll re-write for you pages 345 to 357, Vol. I., of Isis — much jumbled, and confused by [[Henry Steel Olcott|Olcott]], who thought he was improving it!<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 44 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 123.</ref></blockquote> | |||
To this, [[Koot Hoomi|Master K.H.]] commented: | |||
<blockquote>If [[Morya|M.]] told you to beware trusting Isis too implicitly, it was because he was teaching you truth and fact — and that at the time the passage was written we had not yet decided upon teaching the public indiscriminately.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 44 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 259.</ref></blockquote> | |||
== Online versions == | == Online versions == | ||
*[http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/isis/iu-hp.htm# ''Isis Unveiled'' in html format Vols. 1 & 2] by H. P. Blavatsky | *[http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/isis/iu-hp.htm# ''Isis Unveiled'' in html format Vols. 1 & 2] by H. P. Blavatsky | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 4 April 2013
Isis on Reincarnation
Controversy aroused in the 1880's when the teachings of reincarnation was taught by Mme. Blavatsky and her Adept teachers because the concept had been previously rejected in Isis Unveiled:
Reincarnation, i.e., the appearance of the same individual, or rather of his astral monad, twice on the same planet, is not a rule in nature; it is an exception.[1]
However, in the light of later teachings, it is obvious that the author was not referring to the reincarnation of the Higher ego, but to that of the personality, which only happens in exceptional cases:
It is preceded by a violation of the laws of harmony of nature, and happens only when the latter, seeking to restore its disturbed equilibrium, violently throws back into earth-life the astral monad which had been tossed out of the circle of necessity by crime or accident. Thus, in cases of abortion, of infants dying before a certain age, and of congenital and incurable idiocy, nature’s original design to produce a perfect human being, has been interrupted. Therefore, while the gross matter of each of these several entities is suffered to disperse itself at death, through the vast realm of being, the immortal spirit and astral monad of the individual — the latter having been set apart to animate a frame and the former to shed its divine light on the corporeal organization — must try a second time to carry out the purpose of the creative intelligence.[2]
However, it was recognized by the Masters that those passages can be misleading. Master M. wrote to Mr. Sinnet:
By-the-bye, I’ll re-write for you pages 345 to 357, Vol. I., of Isis — much jumbled, and confused by Olcott, who thought he was improving it![3]
To this, Master K.H. commented:
If M. told you to beware trusting Isis too implicitly, it was because he was teaching you truth and fact — and that at the time the passage was written we had not yet decided upon teaching the public indiscriminately.[4]
Online versions
- Isis Unveiled in html format Vols. 1 & 2 by H. P. Blavatsky
- Isis Unveiled in PDF format Vol 1 and Vol 2 by H. P. Blavatsky
Online resources
Articles
- My Books by H. P. Blavatsky
- Studies in Isis Unveiled at WisdomWorld.org
- Isis Unveiled: A Perspective by David Reigle
Additional resources
- Online articles about Isis Unveiled compiled by Daniel H. Caldwell
- ↑ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 351.
- ↑ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 351.
- ↑ Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence No. 44 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 123.
- ↑ Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence No. 44 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 259.