Science: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Article needs expansion}}
'''Science''' (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. In an older and closely related meaning, "science" also refers to a body of knowledge itself, of the type that can be rationally explained and reliably applied.
<br>
 
<br>
<br>
== Modern Science ==
== Modern Science ==
Modern science is often restricted to those branches of study that seek to explain the phenomena of the material universe. From the 19th century, the word "science" became increasingly associated with the scientific method itself, as a disciplined way to study the natural world.
The scientific method seeks to explain the events of nature in a reproducible way. A hypothesis is put forward, which is generally expected to fit with other accepted facts related to the phenomena. This proposed explanation is used to make predictions that are testable by experiment or observation.
Given the fact that observation and experimentation depend on the use of the senses and current technology, the reach of science is inherently limited to both. The view that the methods of the natural sciences can be applied to all areas of investigation, be it philosophical, social scientific, or otherwise, has been associated with 'scientism'.
== Occult Science ==
== Occult Science ==
== Science and Spirituality ==
'''Occult Science''' is a phrase used by [[H. P. Blavatsky]] to denominate the knowledge of the hidden forces of nature and their manipulation. According to her, the occult sciences "are real, actual, and very dangerous sciences. They teach the secret potency of things in Nature, developing and cultivating the hidden powers 'latent in man', thus giving him tremendous advantages over more ignorant mortals."<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, "The Key to Theosophy" (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1972), 26.</ref> Those who engage in the study and practice of this science must commit to it and its laws:
== Online resources==
 
===Articles===
<blockquote>One cannot study and profit by Occult Science, unless one gives himself up to it–heart, soul, and body. Some of its truths are too awful, too dangerous, for the average mind. None can toy and play with such terrible weapons with impunity.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. XIV (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 19​95), 54.</ref></blockquote>
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/history/besant/essays-and-addresses-vol-III/besant.7.html# Ancient and Modern Science] by Annie Besant
 
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/history/besant/essays-and-addresses-vol-III/besant.6.html# Materialism Undermined by Science] by Annie Besant
Because of the danger of this knowledge in the hands of the selfish or the ignorant, these sciences are kept in secret:
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/history/besant/essays-and-addresses-vol-III/besant.8.html# Modern Science and the Higher Self] by Annie Besant
 
*[http://www.theosophical.ca/adyar_pamphlets/AdyarPamphlet_No94.pdf# Nature's Finer Forces] by Annie Besant
<blockquote>These sciences are, and have been for ages, hidden from the vulgar for the very good reason that they would never be appreciated by the selfish educated classes, nor understood by the uneducated; whilst the former might misuse them for their own profit, and thus turn the divine science into black magic. It is often brought forward as an accusation against the [[Esoteric philosophy]] and the Kabbalah that their literature is full of “a barbarous and meaningless jargon” unintelligible to the ordinary mind . . . The facts of Occult Science are of so abstruse a nature, that in most cases no words exist in European languages to express them; in addition to which our “jargon” is a double necessity—(a) for the purpose of describing clearly these facts to him who is versed in the Occult terminology; and (b) to conceal them from the profane.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 237-238.</ref></blockquote>
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/OccultOrExactScience.htm# Occult or Exact Science?] by H. P. Blavatsky
 
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/SubstantialNatureOfMagnetism.htm# The Substantial Nature of Magnetism] by H. P. Blavatsky
Although the [[adept]] knowledgeable in the occult sciences can perform phenomena which would seem miraculous to the uninitiated, every effect produced is based on laws of nature, whether known or unknown to modern science:
*[http://www.austheos.org.au/clibrary/othermat.htm# The Birth of a Universe] by Michael English
 
*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1294# Music of the Spheres: Our Relationship with the Anonymous Dead] by Michael English
<blockquote>To say that occult sciences claim to command nature arbitrarily, is equivalent to saying that the sun commands the day-star to shine. Occult sciences are nature itself; intimate knowledge of their secrets does not give to the Initiates the power to command them. The truth of it is that this knowledge teaches the Adepts the manner in which to furnish certain conditions for the production of phenomena, always due to natural causes, and to the combination of forces analogous to those used by the scientists. The real difference between modern science and occult science consists in this: The first opposes to a natural force another natural force more powerful on the physical plane; the second opposes to a physical force, a spiritual or psychic force, in other words, the soul of that same force.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. VIII (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1960), 79.</ref></blockquote>
*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1414# Quantum Yoga: A View Through the Visionary Window] by Amit Goswami
 
*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1250# Science and the Occult: Where the Twain Meet] by David Grandy
[[Alfred Percy Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]] requested [[Koot Hoomi|Master K.H.]] to share with him his scientific knowledge. However, the Master said that this was tried in the past, and was never successful. He wrote:
*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1617# An Ethics Nightmare] by Philip Harris
 
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/theosophy/judge/articles/adepts-and-modern-science.htm# The Adepts and Modern Science] by William Q. Judge
<blockquote>Every "planet and mineral" that exists in space or inside the earth, are known and recorded in our books thousands of years ago; more; many a true hypothesis was timidly brought forward by their own scientific men and as constantly rejected by the majority with whose preconceptions it interfered. Your intention is laudable but nothing that I may give you in answer will ever be accepted from us. Whenever discovered that "it is verily so," the discovery will be attributed to him who corroborated the evidence — as in the case of Copernicus and Galileo, the latter having availed himself but of the Pythagorean MSS.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 93b (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 311.</ref></blockquote>
*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1620# Timeless Epiphany] by Theodore St. John
 
*[http://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/1622# A Brief Overview of Sacred Time and Space] by Fred Alan Wolf
== Additional resources==
=== Articles and pamphlets from early Theosophists ===
 
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/occult-or-exact-science# Occult or Exact Science?] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/theosophy-and-science/37-topics/atlantis/56-science-s-wrong-turn# The Wrong Turn of Science] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/17-hpblavatsky/hpb-articles/300-ancient-magic-in-modern-science# Ancient Magic in Modern Science] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/negators-of-science The Negators of Science] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/black-magic-in-science# Black Magic in Science] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/imperfections-of-science# The Imperfections of Science] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/substantial-nature-of-magnetism# The Substantial Nature of Magnetism] by H. P. Blavatsky.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/history/besant/essays-and-addresses-vol-III/besant.7.html# Ancient and Modern Science] by Annie Besant.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/history/besant/essays-and-addresses-vol-III/besant.6.html# Materialism Undermined by Science] by Annie Besant.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/history/besant/essays-and-addresses-vol-III/besant.8.html# Modern Science and the Higher Self] by Annie Besant.
* [https://cdn.website-editor.net/e4d6563c50794969b714ab70457d9761/files/uploaded/AdyarPamphlet_No94.pdf# Nature's Finer Forces] by Annie Besant.
* [https://archive.org/details/BL1922TomesTheSecretDoctrineAndModernScience The Secret Doctrine and Modern Science] by Bertram A. Tomes. 1922.
* [https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/forum/f18n05p324_hp-blavatsky-and-modern-science.htm Theosophy and Modern Science] by H.T. Edge. ''Theosophical Siftings'' 6. Reprinted in ''The Theosophical Forum'' – May 1941.
*[http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/forum/f20n07p299_the-scientific-explanation.htm# The Scientific Explanation of the Influence of Celestial Bodies on Earth-Life and Human Affairs] by H. Groot
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/adepts-and-modern-science# The Adepts and Modern Science] by William Q. Judge
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/synthesis-of-occult-science# The Synthesis of Occult Science] by W. Q. Judge
*[http://www.theosophical.org/henry-s-olcott/his-work-for-the-society/1839# The Occult Sciences] by Henry S. Olcott
*[http://hpb.narod.ru/tph/TPH_SOCP.HTM# Studies in Occult Chemistry and Physics] by George E. Sutcliffe. Articles in ''The Theosophist'', 1922-1928.
 
=== Articles and pamphlets in modern science ===
* [http://pablosender.com/science-modern-and-occult-part-1# Science – Modern and Occult - Part 1] and [http://pablosender.com/science-modern-and-occult-part-2# Part 2]
* [https://www.theosophy.world/encyclopedia/science-and-theosophy Science and Theosophy] at Theosophy World.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/theosophy-and-science# Articles on Theosophy and Science] at Blavatsky.Net.
* [http://davidpratt.info/#Ls Science and Theosophy] collection of articles by David Pratt.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/an-ethics-nightmare An Ethics Nightmare] by Philip Harris. ''Quest''  93 no.5 (September-October, 2005):188-189.
* [http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/science/sc-jans5.htm# Theosophy and Science] by Rudi Jansma. From ''Sunrise'' magazine, February/March 2005.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/music-of-the-speres-our-relationship-with-the-anonymous-dead Music of the Spheres: Our Relationship with the Anonymous Dead] by Michael English. ''Quest'' 94 no.4 (July-August, 2006):145-149.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/theosophy-biosophy-and-bioethics Theosophy, Biosophy and Bioethics] by Michael W. Fox. ''Quest'' 91 no.4 (July-August, 2003):136-140.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/quantum-yoga-a-view-through-the-visionary-window Quantum Yoga: A View Through the Visionary Window] by Amit Goswami. ''Quest'' 89 no.2 (March-April, 2001): 52-55.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/science-and-the-occult-where-the-twain-meet Science and the Occult: Where the Twain Meet] by David Grandy. ''Quest'' 94 no.1 (January-February, 2006): 13-17.
* [http://www.austheos.org.au/clibrary/othermat.htm# The Birth of a Universe] by Michael English.
* [http://www.blavatsky.net/index.php/theosophy-and-science/47-sciences/physics/64-duality-of-light# Blavatsky' Foreknowledge of The Wave/Particle Duality of Light] by Reed Carson.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/a-brief-overview-of-sacred-time-and-space A Brief Overview of Sacred Time and Space] by Fred Alan Wolf.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/timeless-epiphany Timeless Epiphany] by Theodore St. John.
* [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/science-and-theosophy-the-challenge-of-unification-part-1 Science and Theosophy: The Challenge of Unification Part 1] and [https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/science-and-theosophy-the-challenge-of-unification-part-2 Part 2] by Michael Levin.
*[https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/man-evol/mie-hp.htm#ap2 Theosophy and the New Science] by Blair A. Moffett. Appendix to Purucker's ''Man in Evolution'', 1977, 2015.


===Books===
===Books===
*[http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/oc/ocindex.htm# Occult Chemistry - 3rd Ed.] by C. W. Leadbeater & Annie Besant
* [http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/oc/ocindex.htm# Occult Chemistry - 3rd Ed.] by C. W. Leadbeater & Annie Besant.


===Audio===
===Audio===
*[http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=B3280B9C-F190-46DF-A598-EEAE94083DB4# Science and Mysticism: The Search for Unity (2 Parts)] by Renee Weber and Ravi Ravindra
* [http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=B3280B9C-F190-46DF-A598-EEAE94083DB4# Science and Mysticism: The Search for Unity (2 Parts)] by Renee Weber and Ravi Ravindra


===Video===
===Video===
*[http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=50CAE549-C2EA-4D2D-94CC-FFBD773E2E23# How Quantum Activism Can Save Civilization] by Amit Goswami
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ldtyCGpq3w&t=12s How Quantum Activism Can Save Civilization] by Amit Goswami
*[http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=FDF2D713-4030-4EBB-8761-2CA4D4D76E40# Sacred Science: Ancient Wisdom or Modern Fad?] by Ralph Hannon
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg784fciQbs Sacred Science: Ancient Wisdom or Modern Fad?] by Ralph Hannon
*[http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=65A63DF0-BB18-45FB-9449-B4A4A313EE58# Spiritual Lessons of Chaos] by Patricia Monaghan
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPTRJyQ9oU0 Spiritual Lessons of Chaos] by Patricia Monaghan
*[http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=1595267F-390F-43D4-A55D-A7336B6B4A75# The Spiritual Dimension Time Travel] by Fred Alan Wolf
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEU3mWHQswE The Spiritual Dimension Time Travel] by Fred Alan Wolf
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfcUjeJWnV0 What Does It Mean to Be Human?], an interview of David Lorimer by Ravi Ravindra at the 146th International Convention of the Theosophical Society in Adyar. December 27, 2021.
 
=== Periodicals ===
*[http://www.theosophical.org/library/1883# Theo-Science Newsletter] Newsletter of the Theosophy-Science Group in Australia
 
=== Bibliograpies ===
*[http://www.theosophical.org/files/resources/library/Bibliography/ScienceandtheWisdomTradition.pdf# Bibliography on Science and the Wisdom Tradition] from the [[Henry S. Olcott Memorial Library]].
 
== Notes ==
<references/>


[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]
[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts in The Secret Doctrine]]
[[Category:Theosophical worldview]]
[[Category:Scientific concepts]]
[[Category:Scientific concepts]]
[[es:Ciencia Oculta]]

Latest revision as of 18:33, 12 March 2024

Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. In an older and closely related meaning, "science" also refers to a body of knowledge itself, of the type that can be rationally explained and reliably applied.

Modern Science

Modern science is often restricted to those branches of study that seek to explain the phenomena of the material universe. From the 19th century, the word "science" became increasingly associated with the scientific method itself, as a disciplined way to study the natural world.

The scientific method seeks to explain the events of nature in a reproducible way. A hypothesis is put forward, which is generally expected to fit with other accepted facts related to the phenomena. This proposed explanation is used to make predictions that are testable by experiment or observation.

Given the fact that observation and experimentation depend on the use of the senses and current technology, the reach of science is inherently limited to both. The view that the methods of the natural sciences can be applied to all areas of investigation, be it philosophical, social scientific, or otherwise, has been associated with 'scientism'.

Occult Science

Occult Science is a phrase used by H. P. Blavatsky to denominate the knowledge of the hidden forces of nature and their manipulation. According to her, the occult sciences "are real, actual, and very dangerous sciences. They teach the secret potency of things in Nature, developing and cultivating the hidden powers 'latent in man', thus giving him tremendous advantages over more ignorant mortals."[1] Those who engage in the study and practice of this science must commit to it and its laws:

One cannot study and profit by Occult Science, unless one gives himself up to it–heart, soul, and body. Some of its truths are too awful, too dangerous, for the average mind. None can toy and play with such terrible weapons with impunity.[2]

Because of the danger of this knowledge in the hands of the selfish or the ignorant, these sciences are kept in secret:

These sciences are, and have been for ages, hidden from the vulgar for the very good reason that they would never be appreciated by the selfish educated classes, nor understood by the uneducated; whilst the former might misuse them for their own profit, and thus turn the divine science into black magic. It is often brought forward as an accusation against the Esoteric philosophy and the Kabbalah that their literature is full of “a barbarous and meaningless jargon” unintelligible to the ordinary mind . . . The facts of Occult Science are of so abstruse a nature, that in most cases no words exist in European languages to express them; in addition to which our “jargon” is a double necessity—(a) for the purpose of describing clearly these facts to him who is versed in the Occult terminology; and (b) to conceal them from the profane.[3]

Although the adept knowledgeable in the occult sciences can perform phenomena which would seem miraculous to the uninitiated, every effect produced is based on laws of nature, whether known or unknown to modern science:

To say that occult sciences claim to command nature arbitrarily, is equivalent to saying that the sun commands the day-star to shine. Occult sciences are nature itself; intimate knowledge of their secrets does not give to the Initiates the power to command them. The truth of it is that this knowledge teaches the Adepts the manner in which to furnish certain conditions for the production of phenomena, always due to natural causes, and to the combination of forces analogous to those used by the scientists. The real difference between modern science and occult science consists in this: The first opposes to a natural force another natural force more powerful on the physical plane; the second opposes to a physical force, a spiritual or psychic force, in other words, the soul of that same force.[4]

Mr. Sinnett requested Master K.H. to share with him his scientific knowledge. However, the Master said that this was tried in the past, and was never successful. He wrote:

Every "planet and mineral" that exists in space or inside the earth, are known and recorded in our books thousands of years ago; more; many a true hypothesis was timidly brought forward by their own scientific men and as constantly rejected by the majority with whose preconceptions it interfered. Your intention is laudable but nothing that I may give you in answer will ever be accepted from us. Whenever discovered that "it is verily so," the discovery will be attributed to him who corroborated the evidence — as in the case of Copernicus and Galileo, the latter having availed himself but of the Pythagorean MSS.[5]

Additional resources

Articles and pamphlets from early Theosophists

Articles and pamphlets in modern science

Books

Audio

Video

Periodicals

Bibliograpies

Notes

  1. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, "The Key to Theosophy" (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1972), 26.
  2. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Collected Writings vol. XIV (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 19​95), 54.
  3. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Theosophical Glossary (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 237-238.
  4. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Collected Writings vol. VIII (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1960), 79.
  5. Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence No. 93b (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 311.