Theosophist: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
===Articles=== | ===Articles=== | ||
*[http://www.theosophy.ph/encyclo/index.php?title=Theosophist,_Definition_of# Definition of Theosophist] at Theosopedia | *[http://www.theosophy.ph/encyclo/index.php?title=Theosophist,_Definition_of# Definition of Theosophist] at Theosopedia | ||
*[http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/bcw/b78-2-8b.htm# A Society without a Dogma] by H. P. Blavatsky | |||
*[http://www.blavatsky.net/theosophy/judge/articles/true-theosophists-path.htm# Musings on the True Theosophist's Path] by William Q. Judge | *[http://www.blavatsky.net/theosophy/judge/articles/true-theosophists-path.htm# Musings on the True Theosophist's Path] by William Q. Judge | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 6 December 2012
Mme. Blavatsky defined the term as follows:
Theosophists. A name by which many mystics at various periods of history have called themselves. The Neo-Platonists of Alexandria were Theosophists; the Alchemists and Kabbalists during the mediaeval ages were likewise so called, also the Martinists, the Quietists, and other kinds of mystics, whether acting independently or incorporated in a brotherhood or society. All real lovers of divine Wisdom and Truth had, and have, a right to the name, rather than those who, appropriating the qualification, live lives or perform actions opposed to the principles of Theosophy. As described by Brother Kenneth R. Mackenzie, the Theosophists of the past centuries -- "entirely speculative, and founding no schools, have still exercised a silent influence upon philosophy; and, no doubt, when the time arrives, many ideas thus silently propounded may yet give new directions to human thought. One of the ways in which these doctrines have obtained not only authority, but power, has been among certain enthusiasts in the higher degrees of Masonry. This power has, however, to a great degree died with the founders, and modern Freemasonry contains few traces of theosophic influence. However accurate and beautiful some of the ideas of Swedenborg, Pernetty, Paschalis, Saint Martin, Marconis, Ragon, and Chastanier may have been, they have but little direct influence on society." This is true of the Theosophists of the last three centuries, but not of the later ones. For the Theosophists of the current century have already visibly impressed themselves on modern literature, and introduced the desire and craving for some philosophy in place of the blind dogmatic faith of yore, among the most intelligent portions of human-kind. Such is the difference between past and modern THEOSOPHY.[1]
Theosophists have no dogmas, exact no blind faith. Theosophists are ever ready to abandon every idea that is proved erroneous upon strictly logical deductions.[2]
Notes
Online resources
Articles
- Definition of Theosophist at Theosopedia
- A Society without a Dogma by H. P. Blavatsky
- Musings on the True Theosophist's Path by William Q. Judge
Audio
- Am I a Theosophist? by Surendra Narayan