Gravitation: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Linda Dorr (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Theosophical View == | == Theosophical View == | ||
In [[ | In her book [[The Secret Doctrine (book)|''The Secret Doctrine'']], [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|H. P. Blavatsky]] made the startling statement that gravity is not a force of nature: | ||
<blockquote>Astronomers who see in gravitation an easy-going solution for many things, and an universal force which allows them to calculate thereby planetary motions, care little about the Cause of Attraction. They call Gravity a law, a cause in itself. We call the forces acting under that name effects, and very secondary effects, too. One day it will be found that the scientific hypothesis does not answer after all. . .<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), | <blockquote>Astronomers who see in gravitation an easy-going solution for many things, and an universal force which allows them to calculate thereby planetary motions, care little about the Cause of Attraction. They call Gravity a law, a cause in itself. We call the forces acting under that name effects, and very secondary effects, too. One day it will be found that the scientific hypothesis does not answer after all.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 490.</ref></blockquote> | ||
A similar claim had been stated a few years earlier by Blavatsky's teachers in [[Mahatma Letter No. 93b#Page 42|private correspondence]], where [[Koot Hoomi|Mahatma K.H.]] wrote that, "there is no gravitation properly speaking; only attraction and repulsion."<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 93B (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 320.</ref> "Attraction and repulsion" were also mentioned by Blavatsky as the forces that explain the effect of gravity: | |||
<blockquote>There is such a thing as attraction and repulsion, and in [[occultism]] it stands in the place of gravity, the scientific teachings about which we reject.<ref>Michael Gomes (transcriber), ''The Secret Doctrine Commentaries'' (The Hague: I.S.I.S. foundation, 2010), 520.</ref></blockquote> | |||
According to Blavatsky, the agent behind the phenomenon of attraction and repulsion is [[Fohat]] (also known as the “fiery whirlwind”), whose chief manifestation on the physical plane is electricity and magnetism. | |||
=== Formation of stellar systems === | |||
Traditionally, modern science explains that the cosmic dust involved in the formation of stellar systems begins to collapse under the force of gravity. However, some lumps of gas are left behind, which will give rise to different stars. The puzzling aspect of this process is that this "lumping" is difficult to explain if only gravity is operating. In ''The Secret Doctrine'', Blavatsky quotes an "ancient Commentary to Stanza IV," which describes the formation of a cosmic systems in a way that matches what science observes today: | |||
<blockquote>The grains (of spawn) are soon attracted to each other and form the curds in the Ocean (of Space). The larger lumps coalesce and receive new spawn . . . and at the appointed time some of the lumps detach themselves and assume spheroidal form . . . after which . . . motion (the Breath) becomes the whirlwind and sets them into rotation.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 97.</ref></blockquote> | |||
However, Blavatsky states that this process is guided, not by gravity, but by magnetic fields: | |||
<blockquote>The "fiery Wind" is the incandescent Cosmic dust which only follows magnetically, as the iron filings follow the magnet, the directing thought of the [[Primordial Seven|"Creative Forces"]].<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 107.</ref></blockquote> | |||
Because the theoretical predictions for star formation in science do not match what is actually observed, scientist have lately begun to consider the possibility that electromagnetism plays a role in the process. They observed that the gas of a stellar system collapsed and fragmented, | |||
<blockquote>. . . forming a string of clumps that aligned themselves with the magnetic field. The clumps will eventually form the cores of future stars. The study's findings confirm theoretical predictions that magnetic fields play a major part in where proto-stars form.<ref>Anon, "Astronomy: Magnetism drives star birth," Nature, volume 538 (06 October 2016), 8.</ref></blockquote> | |||
== Scientific Theories == | == Scientific Theories == | ||
Line 35: | Line 55: | ||
===Articles=== | ===Articles=== | ||
*[http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd1-3-04.htm# Is Gravitation a Law?] by H. P. Blavatsky | *[http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd1-3-04.htm# Is Gravitation a Law?] by H. P. Blavatsky | ||
*[https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-gravity-is-not-like-the-other-forces-20200615/# Why Gravity Is Not Like the Other Forces] at Quanta Magazine | |||
== Notes == | == Notes == |
Latest revision as of 20:53, 11 January 2023
Gravitation, or gravity, is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract each other with a force proportional to their masses.
General description
Gravitation is most familiar as the agent that gives weight to objects with mass and causes them to fall to the ground when dropped. Gravitation causes dispersed matter to coalesce, and coalesced matter to remain intact, thus accounting for the existence of the Earth, the Sun, and most of the macroscopic objects in the universe.
Gravitation is responsible for keeping the Earth and the other planets in their orbits around the Sun; for keeping the Moon in its orbit around the Earth; for the formation of tides; for natural convection, by which fluid flow occurs under the influence of a density gradient and gravity; for heating the interiors of forming stars and planets to very high temperatures; and for various other phenomena observed on Earth.
Gravitation is one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, along with electromagnetism, and the nuclear strong force and weak force. Modern physics describes gravitation using the general theory of relativity by Einstein, in which it is a consequence of the curvature of spacetime governing the motion of inertial objects. The simpler Newton's law of universal gravitation provides an accurate approximation for most physical situations.
Theosophical View
In her book The Secret Doctrine, H. P. Blavatsky made the startling statement that gravity is not a force of nature:
Astronomers who see in gravitation an easy-going solution for many things, and an universal force which allows them to calculate thereby planetary motions, care little about the Cause of Attraction. They call Gravity a law, a cause in itself. We call the forces acting under that name effects, and very secondary effects, too. One day it will be found that the scientific hypothesis does not answer after all.[1]
A similar claim had been stated a few years earlier by Blavatsky's teachers in private correspondence, where Mahatma K.H. wrote that, "there is no gravitation properly speaking; only attraction and repulsion."[2] "Attraction and repulsion" were also mentioned by Blavatsky as the forces that explain the effect of gravity:
There is such a thing as attraction and repulsion, and in occultism it stands in the place of gravity, the scientific teachings about which we reject.[3]
According to Blavatsky, the agent behind the phenomenon of attraction and repulsion is Fohat (also known as the “fiery whirlwind”), whose chief manifestation on the physical plane is electricity and magnetism.
Formation of stellar systems
Traditionally, modern science explains that the cosmic dust involved in the formation of stellar systems begins to collapse under the force of gravity. However, some lumps of gas are left behind, which will give rise to different stars. The puzzling aspect of this process is that this "lumping" is difficult to explain if only gravity is operating. In The Secret Doctrine, Blavatsky quotes an "ancient Commentary to Stanza IV," which describes the formation of a cosmic systems in a way that matches what science observes today:
The grains (of spawn) are soon attracted to each other and form the curds in the Ocean (of Space). The larger lumps coalesce and receive new spawn . . . and at the appointed time some of the lumps detach themselves and assume spheroidal form . . . after which . . . motion (the Breath) becomes the whirlwind and sets them into rotation.[4]
However, Blavatsky states that this process is guided, not by gravity, but by magnetic fields:
The "fiery Wind" is the incandescent Cosmic dust which only follows magnetically, as the iron filings follow the magnet, the directing thought of the "Creative Forces".[5]
Because the theoretical predictions for star formation in science do not match what is actually observed, scientist have lately begun to consider the possibility that electromagnetism plays a role in the process. They observed that the gas of a stellar system collapsed and fragmented,
. . . forming a string of clumps that aligned themselves with the magnetic field. The clumps will eventually form the cores of future stars. The study's findings confirm theoretical predictions that magnetic fields play a major part in where proto-stars form.[6]
Scientific Theories
Newton's theory of gravitation
Isaac Newton formulated the inverse-square law of universal gravitation. Although gravity was frequently regarded as a property of matter, Newton himself did not think so. Actually, he only described the action of gravity but not the cause for it. In a letter to an acquaintance of him, Richard Bentley:
It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential and inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by and through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I believe that no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question.[7]
Although Newton's law was useful in general applications, there were some problems that it could not solve. Newton's theory was finally superseded in 1915 when Albert Einstein developed the theory of general relativity, and was able to solved such problems.
Einstein's theory or relativity
According to the general relativity, gravity is not an attractive force. It's the curvature of the spacetime fabric by matter, which causes bodies to follow certain orbits and free-falling objects move along locally straight paths called geodesics. Einstein's theory is so precise that, as Einstein predicted, even light follows the spacetime curvature. However, the general relativity model cannot account for the sub-atomic level of reality.
Gravity and quantum mechanics
General relativity is incompatible with quantum mechanics. The latter describes gravity in itw own way, treating it like the other fundamental forces--it postulates that the attractive force of gravity arises due to exchange of still undiscovered gravitons. However, this approach has failures that require a more complete theory of quantum gravity, or a new approach to quantum mechanics.
Online resources
Articles
- Is Gravitation a Law? by H. P. Blavatsky
- Why Gravity Is Not Like the Other Forces at Quanta Magazine
Notes
- ↑ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 490.
- ↑ Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence No. 93B (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 320.
- ↑ Michael Gomes (transcriber), The Secret Doctrine Commentaries (The Hague: I.S.I.S. foundation, 2010), 520.
- ↑ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 97.
- ↑ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 107.
- ↑ Anon, "Astronomy: Magnetism drives star birth," Nature, volume 538 (06 October 2016), 8.
- ↑ Richard S. Westfall, Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. (Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 505.