Theosophy Wiki:Policies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Viewpoint in wiki pages == | == Viewpoint in wiki pages == | ||
One advantage of | One advantage of the wiki format is that differing perspectives on a subject can be readily presented together in a neutral and academic fashion. Readers should be allowed form their own opinions after being presented with varied viewpoints that are clearly identified. '''Section headings''' should be used to organize distinctive viewpoints within a wiki page. Examples might be: | ||
*Use of term in Buddhism | |||
*Scientific perspective | |||
*Personal account from Henry Olcott | |||
*Commentary by Annie Besant | *Commentary by Annie Besant | ||
*Alice Bailey viewpoint | *Alice Bailey viewpoint | ||
*Clairvoyant research of Geoffrey Hodson | *Clairvoyant research of Geoffrey Hodson | ||
Maintaining a neutral tone and scholarly attitude is crucial if the viewpoint has the potential to be contentious. | Maintaining a neutral tone and scholarly attitude is crucial if the viewpoint has the potential to be contentious. | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
== Discussion pages == | == Discussion pages == | ||
Each wiki page has an associated '''Discussion''' | Each wiki page has an associated '''Discussion page''', where editors can post comments and respond to others. This facility is best used for things like considering the best organization of a complicated wiki page, or deciding how best to collaborate is writing a page. When initiating a discussion, please add this line at the beginning of the wiki article: | ||
When initiating a discussion, please add this line at the beginning of the wiki article: | <br> | ||
<br> | |||
'''<nowiki>{{Template:See Discussion page}}</nowiki | '''<nowiki>{{Template:See Discussion page}}</nowiki>''' | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
That will place a message at the top of the article drawing attention to the discussion. If all issues under discussion reach a point of resolution, the template should be removed. | That will place a message at the top of the article drawing attention to the discussion. If all issues under discussion reach a point of resolution, the template should be removed. | ||
<br> | |||
Editors who are feeling argumentative or who enjoy provocation should take their comments to | Editors who want to engage in extensive discussion of a topic, who are feeling argumentative, or who enjoy provocation should take their comments to a moderated online forum such as [[Theos-talk]], [[Theosophical Network]], or the [[Theosophical Community]]. For lists of additional discussion groups, see '''[[TheosophyLinks.net]]''' at [http://theosophylinks.net/] or '''<nowiki>[[Category:Internet forums]]</nowiki>'''. | ||
== Courtesy and respect == | == Courtesy and respect == | ||
Editors | Editors are expected to behave in the highest standard of Theosophical principles. Communication should be courteous and respectful. The administrators are not acting as moderators, but will respond to complaints about disrespectful behavior. Contentious edits can be reversed, and contentious editors can be banned. | ||
== Style == | == Style == | ||
. | |||
The earliest editors of the wiki have generally applied the ''Chicago Manual of Style'' in writing end notes and bibliographic entries. However, any style manual may be used, as long as citations are complete enough that the original source can be located by readers. Editors of this wiki come from a wide range of academic disciplines and educational systems, using different styles of citation. It is reasonable to apply styles such as APA (American Psychological Association), MLA (Modern Language Association), Harvard, Bluebook (for legal documents), or other systems, provided that they are comprehensible to | The earliest editors of the wiki have generally applied the ''Chicago Manual of Style'' in writing end notes and bibliographic entries. However, any style manual may be used, as long as citations are complete enough that the original source can be located by readers. Editors of this wiki come from a wide range of academic disciplines and educational systems, using different styles of citation. It is reasonable in this wiki to apply styles such as APA (American Psychological Association), MLA (Modern Language Association), Harvard, Bluebook (for legal documents), or other systems, provided that they are comprehensible to general readers. | ||
The '''initial author''' of a wiki page determines the citation style, and subsequent editors should generally try to match that style. It could be a bit rude to take a long article and reformat all the citations just because you prefer a different style. Our focus should be less on letter-perfect citations than on useful citations. | The '''initial author''' of a wiki page determines the citation style, and subsequent editors should generally try to match that style. It could be a bit rude to take a long article and reformat all the citations just because you prefer a different style. Our focus should be less on letter-perfect citations than on useful citations. For source materials that are available in print and on the Internet, it is preferable to provide citations including both. | ||
See [[Help:Editing]] for additional comments about style | |||
== Treatment of living people == | == Treatment of living people == |
Revision as of 18:13, 28 April 2012
Viewpoint in wiki pages
One advantage of the wiki format is that differing perspectives on a subject can be readily presented together in a neutral and academic fashion. Readers should be allowed form their own opinions after being presented with varied viewpoints that are clearly identified. Section headings should be used to organize distinctive viewpoints within a wiki page. Examples might be:
- Use of term in Buddhism
- Scientific perspective
- Personal account from Henry Olcott
- Commentary by Annie Besant
- Alice Bailey viewpoint
- Clairvoyant research of Geoffrey Hodson
Maintaining a neutral tone and scholarly attitude is crucial if the viewpoint has the potential to be contentious.
Discussion pages
Each wiki page has an associated Discussion page, where editors can post comments and respond to others. This facility is best used for things like considering the best organization of a complicated wiki page, or deciding how best to collaborate is writing a page. When initiating a discussion, please add this line at the beginning of the wiki article:
{{Template:See Discussion page}}
That will place a message at the top of the article drawing attention to the discussion. If all issues under discussion reach a point of resolution, the template should be removed.
Editors who want to engage in extensive discussion of a topic, who are feeling argumentative, or who enjoy provocation should take their comments to a moderated online forum such as Theos-talk, Theosophical Network, or the Theosophical Community. For lists of additional discussion groups, see TheosophyLinks.net at [1] or [[Category:Internet forums]].
Courtesy and respect
Editors are expected to behave in the highest standard of Theosophical principles. Communication should be courteous and respectful. The administrators are not acting as moderators, but will respond to complaints about disrespectful behavior. Contentious edits can be reversed, and contentious editors can be banned.
Style
.
The earliest editors of the wiki have generally applied the Chicago Manual of Style in writing end notes and bibliographic entries. However, any style manual may be used, as long as citations are complete enough that the original source can be located by readers. Editors of this wiki come from a wide range of academic disciplines and educational systems, using different styles of citation. It is reasonable in this wiki to apply styles such as APA (American Psychological Association), MLA (Modern Language Association), Harvard, Bluebook (for legal documents), or other systems, provided that they are comprehensible to general readers.
The initial author of a wiki page determines the citation style, and subsequent editors should generally try to match that style. It could be a bit rude to take a long article and reformat all the citations just because you prefer a different style. Our focus should be less on letter-perfect citations than on useful citations. For source materials that are available in print and on the Internet, it is preferable to provide citations including both.
See Help:Editing for additional comments about style
Treatment of living people
Editors must take particular care when adding information about living or recently deceased people to any TS Wiki page. Biographical sketches should be written sensitively, bearing in mind the privacy of the subject and his/her family and associates. The information must be verifiable, using high quality sources. Contentious material, whether negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable, should be avoided entirely. High quality sources of such material may be listed on the wiki page as “Additional resources.” Contact information may not provided without the express consent of the subject.
For-profit organizations
It is acceptable to establish a wiki page for a for-profit organization, and to provide a link to that organization’s Web page. In the United States, for example, a nonprofit organization can own a for-profit under some circumstances, and that for-profit entity might reasonably have a wiki page giving its history and description. The category “For-profit organization” must be applied to such a page.
Advertising and publicity-seeking are never acceptable. However, if a wiki editor wishes to provide a link to a for-profit site where an unusual resource is available for sale, that information may reasonably be added to the wiki page.