Absolute: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Absolute''' is a term derived from the Latin ''absolūtus'' which means "loosened from" or "unattached." As such, the word "Absolute" | '''Absolute''' is a term derived from the Latin ''absolūtus'' which means "loosened from" or "unattached." As such, the word "Absolute" points out a negative concept meaning non-relative, non-comparative, or without relation to anything else. In philosophy it refers to an unconditioned reality which transcends the limited, conditional, everyday existence. It is sometimes conceived of as the source through which all beings emanate. | ||
This Absolute reality is the first fundamental proposition found in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)|''The Secret Doctrine'']], described as follows: | This Absolute reality is the first fundamental proposition found in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)|''The Secret Doctrine'']], described as follows: |
Revision as of 21:42, 26 March 2012
Absolute is a term derived from the Latin absolūtus which means "loosened from" or "unattached." As such, the word "Absolute" points out a negative concept meaning non-relative, non-comparative, or without relation to anything else. In philosophy it refers to an unconditioned reality which transcends the limited, conditional, everyday existence. It is sometimes conceived of as the source through which all beings emanate.
This Absolute reality is the first fundamental proposition found in The Secret Doctrine, described as follows:
An Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable PRINCIPLE on which all speculation is impossible, since it transcends the power of human conception and could only be dwarfed by any human expression or similitude. It is beyond the range and reach of thought—in the words of Mandukya, “unthinkable and unspeakable.” To render these ideas clearer to the general reader, let him set out with the postulate that there is one absolute Reality which antecedes all manifested, conditioned, being . . . It is of course devoid of all attributes and is essentially without any relation to manifested, finite Being. It is “Be-ness” rather than Being (in Sanskrit, Sat), and is beyond all thought or speculation.[1]
On certain occasions H. P. Blavatsky used the termed "Absoluteness" to provide an even less concrete idea of the Absolute:
Absoluteness. When predicated of the UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, it denotes an abstract noun, which is more correct and logical than to apply the adjective “absolute ” to that which has neither attributes nor limitations, nor can IT have any.[2]
Be-ness, Sat, Parabrahman, Ain Soph, are some of the terms Mme. Blavatsky uses to refer to the Absolute.