Greek mythology: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Legend of Prometheus== | ==Legend of Prometheus== | ||
The Legend of Prometheus is often equated to the Story of Lucifer. As [H. P. Blavatsky] comments: | |||
<blockquote> Hence the allegory of Prometheus, who steals the divine fire so as to allow | |||
men to proceed consciously on the path of spiritual evolution, thus transforming | |||
the most perfect of animals on earth into a potential god, and making him free | |||
to "take the kingdom of heaven by violence." Hence also, the curse pronounced by | |||
Zeus against Prometheus, and by Jehovah-Il-da-Baoth against his "rebellious | |||
son," Satan. | |||
(Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine Volume II, pg. 244) | |||
The name of Prometheus, to those who | The name of Prometheus, to those who | ||
Line 22: | Line 33: | ||
(Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine Volume II, pg. 95) | (Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine Volume II, pg. 95) | ||
==H. P. Blavatsky and Myths== | ==H. P. Blavatsky and Myths== |
Revision as of 19:25, 13 July 2012
Primary Gods and Legends
Legend of Prometheus
The Legend of Prometheus is often equated to the Story of Lucifer. As [H. P. Blavatsky] comments:
Hence the allegory of Prometheus, who steals the divine fire so as to allow
men to proceed consciously on the path of spiritual evolution, thus transforming the most perfect of animals on earth into a potential god, and making him free to "take the kingdom of heaven by violence." Hence also, the curse pronounced by Zeus against Prometheus, and by Jehovah-Il-da-Baoth against his "rebellious son," Satan.
(Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine Volume II, pg. 244)
The name of Prometheus, to those who had nought to do with the physical body, yet everything with the purely spiritual man...Each class of Creators endows man with what it has to give: the one builds his external form; the other gives him its essence, which later on becomes the Human Higher Self owing to the personal exertion of the individual; but they could not make men as they were themselves -- perfect, because sinless; sinless, because having only the first, pale shadowy outlines of attributes, and these all perfect -- from the human standpoint -- white, pure and cold as the virgin snow. Where there is no struggle, there is no meritThe first humanity, therefore, was a pale copy of its progenitors; too material, even in its ethereality, to be a hierarchy of gods; too spiritual and pure to be MEN, endowed as it is with every negative (Nirguna) perfection. Perfection, to be fully such, must be born out of imperfection, the incorruptible must grow out of the corruptible, having the latter as its vehicle and basis and contrast. Absolute light is absolute darkness, and vice versa
(Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine Volume II, pg. 95)
H. P. Blavatsky and Myths
Notes