Koot Hoomi: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


The Vishnu Purana, Book 3, Chapter 6, mentions a Rishi called Kuthumi, pupil of Paushyinji.
The Vishnu Purana, Book 3, Chapter 6, mentions a Rishi called Kuthumi, pupil of Paushyinji.
== Education in Europe ==


Apparently before being an Adept, Master Koot Hoomi visited Europe and studied in some of the Universities there. Mr. [[A. O. Hume]], in his "Hints on Esoteric Theosophy," wrote:
Apparently before being an Adept, Master Koot Hoomi visited Europe and studied in some of the Universities there. Mr. [[A. O. Hume]], in his "Hints on Esoteric Theosophy," wrote:

Revision as of 22:58, 16 February 2012

Koot Hoomi (also spelled Kuthumi) is one of the Mahatmas that inspired the founding of the Theosophical Society. Also known as Koot Hoomi Lal Sing, he engaged in a correspondence with two English Theosophists living in India, A. P. Sinnett and A. O. Hume, which was published in the book The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett.

The Vishnu Purana, Book 3, Chapter 6, mentions a Rishi called Kuthumi, pupil of Paushyinji.


Education in Europe

Apparently before being an Adept, Master Koot Hoomi visited Europe and studied in some of the Universities there. Mr. A. O. Hume, in his "Hints on Esoteric Theosophy," wrote:

Take a case said to have occurred many years ago in Germany, in which a Brother, who has corresponded with us, is said to have taken part. He was at this time a student, and though in course of preparation was not then himself an Adept, but was, like all regular chelas, under the special charge of an Adept. A young friend of his was accused of forgery, and tried for the same. Our Brother, then a student as above explained, was called as a witness to prove his friend's handwriting; the case was perfectly clear and a conviction certain. Through his mentor, our Brother learnt that his accused friend did not really deserve punishment that would necessarily fall on him, and which would have ruined not only him, but other innocent persons dependent on him. He had really committed a forgery but not knowingly or meaningly, though it was impossible to show this. So when the alleged forged document was handed to the witness, he merely said: "I see nothing written here," and returned the deed blank. His mentor had caused the entire writing to disappear. It was supposed that a wrong paper had been by mistake handed to the witness; search was made high and low, but the deed never appeared, and the accused was perforce acquitted.[1]


Evidence of his existence

In a letter received by Mr. Sinnett in July 5, 1881, Master K.H. wrote:

I may answer you, what I said to G. Th. Fechner one day, when he wanted to know the Hindu view on what he had written — "You are right;... ‘every diamond, every crystal, every plant and star has its own individual soul, besides man and animal...’ and, ‘there is a hierarchy of souls from the lowest forms of matter up to the World Soul,’ but you are mistaken when adding to the above the assurance that ‘the spirits of the departed hold direct psychic communication with Souls that are still connected with a human body’ — for, they do not."[2]


In 1883 C.C. Massey, leader of the British Theosophists, tried to test this evidence of the existence of the Mahatmas by writing to Dr. Hugo Wernekke, who lived at Weimar, Germany, and was in touch with Professor Fechner. He wanted "to find out whether Professor Fechner ever had such a conversation with an Oriental." The answer from Professor Fechner to Dr. Hugo Wernekke dated "Leipzig, April 25th, 1883" said:

What Mr. Massey enquires about is undoubtedly in the main correct; the name of the Hindu concerned, when he was in Leipzig, was however, Nisi Kanta Chattopadhyaya, not Koot Humi. In the middle of the seventies he lived for about one year in Leipzig and aroused a certain interest owing to his foreign nationality, without being otherwise conspicuous; he was introduced to several families and became a member of the Academic Philosophical Society, to which you also belonged, where on one occasion he gave a lecture on Buddhism. I have these notes from Mr. Wirth, the Librarian of the Society, who is good enough to read to me three times a week. I also heard him give a lecture in a private circle on the position of women among the Hindus. I remember very well that he visited me once, and though I cannot remember our conversation, his statement that I questioned him about the faith of the Hindus is very likely correct. Apart from this I have not had personal intercourse with him; but, after his complete disappearance from Leipzig, I have been interested to hear about him, and especially to know that he plays an important role in his native country, such as undoubtedly he could not play here.


Notes

  1. Hume, A. O., ???????????, 37
  2. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett ????????????