Dugpa: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
== Drukpa Lineage ==
== Drukpa Lineage ==


The word "dugpa" was frequently used by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|Mme. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters]] in a generic sense to refer to all "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], that is, the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', ''Sakyapas'', and the pre-Buddhist natives ''Böns''. These are the non-reformed sects that did not follow Tsongkhapa’s new order, the ''Gelugpas''.
The word "dugpa" was frequently used by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|Mme. Blavatsky]] and the [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters]] in a generic sense to refer to the "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of [[Tibetan Buddhism]] and the pre-Buddhist natives Böns. Of the four main sects, three (the ''Nyigmapas'', ''Kagyupas'', and ''Sakyapas''), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the ''Gelugpas''. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the [[Dugpa#Shmmars|Shamarpas]] wear a red. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. The Gelugpas wear yellow hats. Therefore, by "red hat" Blavatsky normally referred to some Böns, Nyigmapas and Shamarpas.


As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>
As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, ''The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism'', where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.<ref>[http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/dugpas-drugpas-blavatsky.pdf# Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle]</ref> This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.</ref>

Revision as of 20:34, 10 July 2017

Dugpa (Tibetan ’brug pa) is a word used by H. P. Blavatsky and the Masters of Wisdom as a synonym for a black magician or sorcerer, frequently referred to as "Brother of the Shadow".

General description

Mme. Blavatsky wrote:

Dugpas (Tib.). Lit., “Red Caps,” a sect in Tibet. Before the advent of Tsong-ka-pa in the fourteenth century, the Tibetans, whose Buddhism had deteriorated and been dreadfully adulterated with the tenets of the old Bhon religion,—were all Dugpas. From that century, however, and after the rigid laws imposed upon the Gelukpas (yellow caps) and the general reform and purification of Buddhism (or Lamaism), the Dugpas have given themselves over more than ever to sorcery, immorality, and drunkenness. Since then the word Dugpas has become a synonym of “sorcerer”, “adept of black magic” and everything vile. There are few, if any, Dugpas in Eastern Tibet, but they congregate in Bhutan, Sikkim, and the borderlands generally.[1]

In one of his letters, Master K.H. wrote to A. P. Sinnett:

In our mountains here, the Dugpas lay at dangerous points, in paths frequented by our Chelas, bits of old rag, and other articles best calculated to attract the attention of the unwary, which have been impregnated with their evil magnetism. If one be stepped upon a tremendous psychic shock may be communicated to the wayfarer, so that he may lose his footing and fall down the precipice before he can recover himself. Friend, beware of Pride and Egoism, two of the worst snares for the feet of him who aspires to climb the high paths of Knowledge and Spirituality. You have opened a joint of your armour for the Dugpas — do not complain if they have found it out and wounded you there.[2]

Drukpa Lineage

The word "dugpa" was frequently used by Mme. Blavatsky and the Masters in a generic sense to refer to the "red-cap" or "red-hat" sects of Tibetan Buddhism and the pre-Buddhist natives Böns. Of the four main sects, three (the Nyigmapas, Kagyupas, and Sakyapas), did not follow the reforms proposed by Tsongkhapa’s in his new order, the Gelugpas. The Nyigmapas wear red ceremonial hats. Among the Kagyupas, the Karmapas wear black hats while the Shamarpas wear a red. The Sakyapas' headdress is also red, although this sect is not generally referred to by colour. The Gelugpas wear yellow hats. Therefore, by "red hat" Blavatsky normally referred to some Böns, Nyigmapas and Shamarpas.

As David Reigle showed, this general meaning for the word "dugpa" was prevalent during Blavatsky's time. This mistake was corrected in 1895 by L. Austine Waddell’s book, The Buddhism of Tibet, or Lamaism, where he states that the Dug-pa are a sub-sect of the red-cap sect Kagyupa.[3] This sub-sect eventually came to be the main school of Buddhism in Bhutan, known as the "Drukpa Kargyu".[4]

Mme. Blavatsky wrote an article in line with this view, where she uses the term "dugpa" in a more restricted way, applying it to the Nyingmapas and Shammars in Bhutan:

The "Dug-pa(*) or Red Caps" belong to the old Nyang-na-pa sect, who resisted the religious reform introduced by Tsong-kha-pa between the latter part of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth centuries. It was only after a lama coming to them from Tibet in the tenth century had converted them from the old Buddhist faith so strongly mixed up with the Bhon practices of the aborigines--into the Shammar sect, that, in opposition to the reformed "Gyelukpas," the Bhootanese set up a regular system of reincarnations.

(*) The term "Dug-pa" in Tibet is deprecatory. They themselves pronounce it "Dög-pa" from the root to "bind" (religious binders to the old faith): while the paramount sect--the Gyeluk-pa (yellow caps)--and the people, use the word in the sense of "Dug-pa" mischief-makers, sorcerers. The Bhootanese are generally called Dug-pa throughout Tibet and even in some parts of Northern India.[5]

However, even this reference to this particular Bhutanese sect should not be taken in a too general way. In reference to the Brothers of the Shadow, Mme. Blavatsky wrote:

In Sikkim and Tibet they are called Dug-pas (red-caps), in contra-distinction to the Geluk-pas (yellow-caps), to which latter most of the adepts belong. And here we must beg the reader not to misunderstand us. For though the whole of Bhûtan and Sikkim belongs to the old religion of the Bhons, now known generally as the Dug-pas, we do not mean to have it understood that the whole of the population is possessed, en masse, or that they are all sorcerers. Among them are found as good men as anywhere else, and we speak above only of the élite of their Lamaseries, of a nucleus of priests, "devil-dancers," and fetish worshippers, whose dreadful and mysterious rites are utterly unknown to the greater part of the population.[6]

Shammar

Tibetan word shamar (ཞྭ་དམར zhwa dmar) means "red hat." When Blavatsky uses this term she is reffering to an offshoot of the Böns:

The Shammar sect is not, as wrongly supposed, a kind of corrupted Buddhism, but an offshoot of the Bön religion—itself a degenerated remnant of the Chaldean mysteries of old, now a religion entirely based upon necromancy, sorcery and sooth-saying. The introduction of Buddha’s name in it means nothing.[7]

There are references to this use of the term in the 19th century. For example, in a book on the history of Hindustan we find:

Two sets [sic] divide the votaries of Buddha, the Gyllookpa [Gelug-pa], distinguished by robes of yellow cloth, and the Shammar, clothed in red. In ancient times, the latter are reported to have been the most numerous; till the Gyllookpa assembling a mighty army, drove them from their possessions, and forced them to take refuge in Bootan, whose inhabitants are all of that sect.[8]

Shamarpa

The Shamarpa is one of the two lineage holders of the Karma Kagyu school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Karmapa being the main one. The Shamarpas (the first one being established in 1284), are sometimes referred to as the "Red Hat Karmapas".

The 10th Shamarpa (1742–1793) was declared guilty of inciting a war between Tibet and Nepal. He was exiled from Tibet and a ban was placed on his future incarnations. In 1963, following a request from the 16th Karmapa, the Tibetan Government in Exile lifted the ban. Today, Künzig Shamar Rinpoche is the 14th Shamarpa.

Notes

  1. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Theosophical Glossary (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 105-106.
  2. Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence No. 131 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 436-437.
  3. Who Are the Dugpas in Theosophical Writings? by David Reigle
  4. Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. "Brug-pa", http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/82022/Brug-pa.
  5. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Collected Writings vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 9-10.
  6. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Collected Writings vol. VI (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1989), 198.
  7. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Collected Writings vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 15, fn.
  8. Lawrence Dundas Campbell et al, The Asiatic annual register or a view of the history of Hindustan and of the politics, commerce and literature of Asia, vol. 3 (London: Wilson and Co., Oriental Press, 1802), 15.

Online resources

Articles