Oriental Esoteric Society: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The Oriental Esoteric Society was established in the late 1890s by Dr. Alberto de Sarâk, the Count de Das, a controversial figure who had been expelled from the Theosophica...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The Oriental Esoteric Society was established in the late 1890s by Dr. Alberto de Sarâk, the Count de Das, a controversial figure who had been expelled from the [[Theosophical Society]] by [[Henry Steel Olcott|Colonel Olcott]] in 1892. Among the objects of the Oriental Esoteric Society, two are particularly significant: (a) to “form a chain of universal fraternity based upon the purest altruism, without hatred of sect, caste or color” and (b) “study the Occult Sciences of the Orient and . . . develop those psychic powers which are in man and his environment.”  
'''The Oriental Esoteric Society''' was established in the late 1890s by Dr. Alberto de Sarâk, the Count de Das, a controversial figure who had been expelled from the [[Theosophical Society]] by [[Henry Steel Olcott|Colonel Olcott]] in 1892. Among the objects of the Oriental Esoteric Society, two are particularly significant: (a) to “form a chain of universal fraternity based upon the purest altruism, without hatred of sect, caste or color” and (b) “study the Occult Sciences of the Orient and . . . develop those psychic powers which are in man and his environment.”  
   
   
The O.E. Library Critic was, for a time, the literary arm of the OES.
[[The O. E. Library Critic (periodical)|''The O.E. Library Critic'']] was, for a time, the literary arm of the OES.
 
== Notes ==
<references/>
 
[[Category:Organizations|Oriental Esoteric Society]]

Revision as of 14:44, 15 April 2021

The Oriental Esoteric Society was established in the late 1890s by Dr. Alberto de Sarâk, the Count de Das, a controversial figure who had been expelled from the Theosophical Society by Colonel Olcott in 1892. Among the objects of the Oriental Esoteric Society, two are particularly significant: (a) to “form a chain of universal fraternity based upon the purest altruism, without hatred of sect, caste or color” and (b) “study the Occult Sciences of the Orient and . . . develop those psychic powers which are in man and his environment.”

The O.E. Library Critic was, for a time, the literary arm of the OES.

Notes