Parabrahman

From Theosophy Wiki
Revision as of 21:28, 28 April 2013 by Joe Hasiewicz (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Parabrahman (devanāgarī: परब्रह्मन्) from para "beyond" and Brahman "universal self or spirit", is a term often used in Hindu philosophy, especially in Advaita Vedanta, for the highest deity, or, rather, the Absolute Reality that is beyond gods.

In the writings of H. P. Blavatsky parabrahman is frequently used as a synonym for the Absolute or the Be-ness:

Parabrahm (the One Reality, the Absolute) is the field of Absolute Consciousness, i.e., that Essence which is out of all relation to conditioned existence, and of which conscious existence is a conditioned symbol. But once that we pass in thought from this (to us) Absolute Negation, duality supervenes in the contrast of Spirit (or consciousness) and Matter, Subject and Object.[1]

Shankara’s idea of the Parabrahman

Shankara (also known as Ādi Śaṅkarācārya, Ādi Śaṅkarācāri and Śaṅkara Bhagavatpādācārya 788 CE - 820 CE) has said that the ultimate reality is the Parabrahman and there is only one Supreme Parabrahman and all the other deities are the forms and expansions of this Parabrahman.

By reflecting on Upanishadic assertions, Shankara made a distinction between Brahma as it must be in itself and as it has got to be conceived by us in relation with the world of our experience.

The former he calls nirguna Brahma, nirvishesha or Parabrahman, and the latter, saguna, savishesha or apara Brahma.

Parabrahman is also called Sat (being or existence), Paramartha-satya (ultimate reality), Paramartha-tattva (highest entity) and Bhuma (absolute, great or unexcelled).

Parabrahman is eternally self-identical, strictly one, always of the same nature, without parts, and hence without change, perfectly immutable in its essential nature, indestructible because of knowing no increase or decrease, imperceptible, inconceivable, ungraspable, devoid of all qualities, without parts, untouched by action, perfectly quiet, pure and stainless, neither coarse nor fine, neither big nor small. Neither space nor time can be conceived in it; for it is neither this nor that. It is great, unborn, undecaying or unaging, indestructible, immortal and free from all fear.

It is different from vice and virtue both, and different from both cause and effect. The triple-time designated as past, present and future does not enter into its nature. It is not in time nor time in it. So also neither space is in it, nor it, in space. It has neither inside or outside, no cause, no effect. In fact, none of the categories in terms of which we understand things is applicable to it. It is indefinable because it is indeterminate. A definition must be per genus et differentiam.[2] But (Para) Brahma has neither genus nor differentia.

It is the highest Being, and there is nothing existing independently of it, from which it could be distinguished. Though beyond all time and space, etc., it permeates all. Just as the great space (Ākāśa) pervades the space within a jar, so also (Para) Brahma, called Sat, pervades the entire universe, including the space itself. All the same, it is, in its essential nature, altogether unconditioned, and devoid of all qualities which characterize the world we live in. Parts or properties it has none. It is non-related (asanga and asansargi), and devoid of all adjuncts and differences.

This however does not mean that it is not nothing. To negate qualities of (Para) Brahma is not to negate its Being or existence. In fact, all existence that appears to be there is said to be the existence of (Para) Brahma itself. It is eternally self-existent, and hence the only real entity. It is the ultimate source, ground and support of all appearances. It is the existence that shines forth in all beings alike. It is the universal Self of all of us. And our undeniable experience of our existence, Shankara has maintained, is the surest proof of its existence.

[3]

Notes

  1. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Secret Doctrine vol. I, (Wheaton, Ill: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 15
  2. For definition please see article Genus–differentia
  3. Dr. R. S. Naulakha M.A., Ph.D, Shankara’s Brahmavada (Acharya Nagar, Kanpur: Kitab Ghar Publishing, 1964), 63

Further reading