Babaji: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Babaji''' was a young Maratha Brahmin of South India, whose real name was S. Krishnaswami. He was at one time a clerk in the Collector's office in Nellore. In the early 1880s, after the arrival of the [[Founders]] to India he joined the staff at the theosophical headquarters in Bombay and assumed the name of "Babaji" (also spelled "Bawajee" or "Bowajee").<ref>[http://davidpratt.info/johnson2.htm#babaji The Theosophical Mahatmas. A Critique of Paul Johnson’s New Myth], Part 2, Ch. 8, by David Pratt</ref> A few months after this he became a probationary [[chela]] of [[Koot Hoomi|Mahatma K.H.]], assuming the mystery name [[Dharbagiri Nath]].<ref>A. Trevor Barker, ''The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett'' Letter No. LXX, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 170.</ref> | '''Babaji''' was a young Maratha Brahmin of South India, whose real name was S. Krishnaswami. He was at one time a clerk in the Collector's office in Nellore. In the early 1880s, after the arrival of the [[Founders]] to India he joined the staff at the theosophical headquarters in Bombay and assumed the name of "Babaji" (also spelled "Bawajee" or "Bowajee").<ref>[http://davidpratt.info/johnson2.htm#babaji The Theosophical Mahatmas. A Critique of Paul Johnson’s New Myth], Part 2, Ch. 8, by David Pratt</ref> A few months after this he became a probationary [[chela]] of [[Koot Hoomi|Mahatma K.H.]], assuming the mystery name [[Dharbagiri Nath]].<ref>A. Trevor Barker, ''The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett'' Letter No. LXX, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 170.</ref> The Master frequently referred to him as "the little man". Babaji was present at the time of the [[Hodgson Report]] at Adyar.<ref>George E. Linton and Virginia Hanson, eds., ''Readers Guide to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett'' (Adyar, Chennai, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 218 </ref></blockquote>. | ||
== Dharbagiri Nath == | |||
In late 1882 [[Gwala K. Deb]] (an accepted chela of the Master K.H. whose mystical name also was Dharbagiri Nath) was to travel to Simla from Darjeeling to deliver a letter from Mahatma K.H. to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]]. However, Deb could not leave Darjeeling, and Babaji allowed him to overshadow his own body, in order to perform the allotted task. In [[Mahatma Letter No. 85b#Page 30|one of his letters]], Master K.H. wrote to Sinnett: | In late 1882 [[Gwala K. Deb]] (an accepted chela of the Master K.H. whose mystical name also was Dharbagiri Nath) was to travel to Simla from Darjeeling to deliver a letter from Mahatma K.H. to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]]. However, Deb could not leave Darjeeling, and Babaji allowed him to overshadow his own body, in order to perform the allotted task. In [[Mahatma Letter No. 85b#Page 30|one of his letters]], Master K.H. wrote to Sinnett: | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
<blockquote>[I]f he had the right to call himself Dharb. Nath he had no right to abuse of this position by assuming an attitude which only the real Dh. Nath would have the right to assume, and which he never would, however . . . he took advantage of the position assigned to him temporarily — to harm me and the Cause, and several Theosophists, who see in him the real, instead of the reflection of Dh. N. the high chela.<ref>A. Trevor Barker, ''The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett'' Letter No. LXXII, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 174.</ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>[I]f he had the right to call himself Dharb. Nath he had no right to abuse of this position by assuming an attitude which only the real Dh. Nath would have the right to assume, and which he never would, however . . . he took advantage of the position assigned to him temporarily — to harm me and the Cause, and several Theosophists, who see in him the real, instead of the reflection of Dh. N. the high chela.<ref>A. Trevor Barker, ''The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett'' Letter No. LXXII, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 174.</ref></blockquote> | ||
== Failure as a disciple == | |||
Eventually, Babaji failed to remain a chela. Mme. Blavatsky wrote to [[Charles Webster Leadbeater|C. W. Leadbeater]], who at the time was a probationary chela of Mater K.H.: | Eventually, Babaji failed to remain a chela. Mme. Blavatsky wrote to [[Charles Webster Leadbeater|C. W. Leadbeater]], who at the time was a probationary chela of Mater K.H.: | ||
<blockquote>[Babaji] was sent to Simla to Mr. S, that is to say, he gave up his personality to a real chela, Dharbagiri Nath, and has assumed his name since then. As I was under pledge of silence I could not contradict him when I heard him bragging that he had lived with his Master in Tibet and was an accepted regular chela. But now when he failed as a “probationary” owing to personal ambition, jealousy of Mohini, and a suddenly developed rage and envy even to hatred of Colonel and myself – now Master ordered me to say the truth.<ref>Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa, ''K. H. Letters to C. W. Leadbeater'', (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 85-86.</ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>[Babaji] was sent to Simla to Mr. S, that is to say, he gave up his personality to a real chela, Dharbagiri Nath, and has assumed his name since then. As I was under pledge of silence I could not contradict him when I heard him bragging that he had lived with his Master in Tibet and was an accepted regular chela. But now when he failed as a “probationary” owing to personal ambition, jealousy of Mohini, and a suddenly developed rage and envy even to hatred of Colonel and myself – now Master ordered me to say the truth.<ref>Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa, ''K. H. Letters to C. W. Leadbeater'', (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 85-86.</ref></blockquote> | ||
When this letter was in transit the Master K.H. precipitated "The little man has failed and will reap his reward". | |||
Babaji returned to India and eventually died in obscurity. | Babaji returned to India and eventually died in obscurity. | ||
Revision as of 20:13, 11 April 2013
Babaji was a young Maratha Brahmin of South India, whose real name was S. Krishnaswami. He was at one time a clerk in the Collector's office in Nellore. In the early 1880s, after the arrival of the Founders to India he joined the staff at the theosophical headquarters in Bombay and assumed the name of "Babaji" (also spelled "Bawajee" or "Bowajee").[1] A few months after this he became a probationary chela of Mahatma K.H., assuming the mystery name Dharbagiri Nath.[2] The Master frequently referred to him as "the little man". Babaji was present at the time of the Hodgson Report at Adyar.[3].
Dharbagiri Nath
In late 1882 Gwala K. Deb (an accepted chela of the Master K.H. whose mystical name also was Dharbagiri Nath) was to travel to Simla from Darjeeling to deliver a letter from Mahatma K.H. to Mr. Sinnett. However, Deb could not leave Darjeeling, and Babaji allowed him to overshadow his own body, in order to perform the allotted task. In one of his letters, Master K.H. wrote to Sinnett:
And now good-bye, I ask you again — do not frighten my little man; he may prove useful to you some day — only do not forget — he is but an appearance.[4]
It seems that after this event he started to use the name Dharbagiri Nath publicly, which produced confusion in the minds of some members between the accepted and the probationary chelas.
In March 1885, he accompanied Mme. Blavatsky and others to Europe and was at first devoted to her. But later he turned against HPB accusing her of desecrating the Masters’ names by connecting them with psychic phenomena. He caused much trouble in theosophical circles in Europe and England, especially at Elberfeld with the Gebhard family. Babaji exercised considerable influence over the Gebhards and other theosophists, largely because he was a Hindu claiming to be an advanced chela.[5]
Mme. Blavatsky wrote to Mr. Sinnett:
He has as much right to call himself Dharbagiri Nath, as “Babaji.” There is—a true Dh. Nath, a chela, who is with Master K. H. for the last 13 or 14 years; who was at Darjeeling, and he is he of whom Mahatma K. H. wrote to you at Simla. For reasons I cannot explain he remained at Darjeeling. You heard him ONCE, you never saw him, but you saw his portrait his alter ego physically and his contrast diametrically opposite to him morally, intellectually and so on. Krishna Swami’s, or Babaji’s deception does not rest in his assuming the name, for it was the mystery name chosen by him when he became the Mahatma’s chela; but in his profiting of my lips being sealed; of people’s erroneous conceptions about him that he, this present Babaji was a HIGH chela whereas he was only a probationary one. . .[6]
[I]f he had the right to call himself Dharb. Nath he had no right to abuse of this position by assuming an attitude which only the real Dh. Nath would have the right to assume, and which he never would, however . . . he took advantage of the position assigned to him temporarily — to harm me and the Cause, and several Theosophists, who see in him the real, instead of the reflection of Dh. N. the high chela.[7]
Failure as a disciple
Eventually, Babaji failed to remain a chela. Mme. Blavatsky wrote to C. W. Leadbeater, who at the time was a probationary chela of Mater K.H.:
[Babaji] was sent to Simla to Mr. S, that is to say, he gave up his personality to a real chela, Dharbagiri Nath, and has assumed his name since then. As I was under pledge of silence I could not contradict him when I heard him bragging that he had lived with his Master in Tibet and was an accepted regular chela. But now when he failed as a “probationary” owing to personal ambition, jealousy of Mohini, and a suddenly developed rage and envy even to hatred of Colonel and myself – now Master ordered me to say the truth.[8]
When this letter was in transit the Master K.H. precipitated "The little man has failed and will reap his reward".
Babaji returned to India and eventually died in obscurity.
See brief biography in Damodar and the Pioneers of the Theosophical Movement, p. 537. See The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett (book) , pp. 286, 335, 336, 340; and Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom I: 132
Online resources
Articles
- The Theosophical Mahatmas. A Critique of Paul Johnson’s New Myth, Part 2, Ch. 8, by David Pratt
Notes
- ↑ The Theosophical Mahatmas. A Critique of Paul Johnson’s New Myth, Part 2, Ch. 8, by David Pratt
- ↑ A. Trevor Barker, The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett Letter No. LXX, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 170.
- ↑ George E. Linton and Virginia Hanson, eds., Readers Guide to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (Adyar, Chennai, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 218
- ↑ Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence No. 44 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), ???.
- ↑ George E. Linton and Virginia Hanson, eds., Readers Guide to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (Adyar, Chennai, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 218.
- ↑ A. Trevor Barker, The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett Letter No. LXX, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 170.
- ↑ A. Trevor Barker, The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett Letter No. LXXII, (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 1973), 174.
- ↑ Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa, K. H. Letters to C. W. Leadbeater, (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 85-86.