Mahatma Letter No. 17: Difference between revisions
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) (→Page 3) |
Pablo Sender (talk | contribs) (→Page 3) |
||
(29 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[ | {{Infobox MLbox | ||
[[ | | header1 = People involved | | ||
| writtenby = [[Koot Hoomi]] | |||
| receivedby = [[A. P. Sinnett]] | |||
| sentvia = adept in France | |||
| header2 = Dates | |||
[[ | | writtendate = unknown | ||
| receiveddate = March 26,1881 | |||
''' | | otherdate = unknown | ||
| header3 = Places | |||
| sentfrom = Terich-Mir | |||
| receivedat = London | |||
| vialocation = unknown{{pad|9em}} | |||
}} | |||
This is '''Letter No. 17''' in''' [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (book)|''The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett'']], 4th chronological edition'''. It corresponds to '''Letter No. 31''' in '''Barker numbering.''' See below for [[Mahatma Letter No. 17#Context and background|Context and background]]. | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 16|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter chrono]]</big>{{pad|3em}} | <big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 16|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter chrono]]</big>{{pad|3em}} | ||
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 18|Next letter chrono'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big>{{pad|3em}} | <big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 18|Next letter chrono'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big>{{pad|3em}} | ||
<br> | |||
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 74|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter Barker]]</big>{{pad|3em}} | <big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 74|'''<nowiki> < </nowiki>'''Prev letter Barker]]</big>{{pad|3em}} | ||
<big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 82|Next letter Barker'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big> | <big>[[Mahatma Letter No. 82|Next letter Barker'''<nowiki> > </nowiki>''']]</big> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== Envelope == | == Envelope == | ||
{{Col-begin|width=98%}} | {{Col-begin|width=98%}} | ||
{{Col-break|width=55%}} | {{Col-break|width=55%}} | ||
England.<br> | |||
A. P. Sinnett Es. F.T.S.<br> | |||
c/o J. Herbert Stacks Esq.<br> | |||
30 Kensington.<br> | |||
Park. Gardens.<br> | |||
London. | |||
{{Col-break|width=3%}} | |||
{{Col-break|width=15%}} | {{Col-break|width=15%}} | ||
[ | [http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-0_Envelope_6619.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-0_Envelope_6619_thm.jpg] | ||
{{Col-break|width=30%}} | {{Col-break|width=30%}} | ||
'''NOTES:''' | '''NOTES:''' | ||
* | * Barker underscored the word "England" twice in pencil and added the letter number XXXI. | ||
* Numbers 304 and 90 are penciled at the right. | |||
* The stamp is from France, saying "Republique Française" with a postmark above it saying "Loire". Another postmark above it refers to "Nante". | |||
* A red "PAID" postmark from London has the date "26 Ma 81". | |||
{{Col-end}} | {{Col-end}} | ||
== Envelope == | == Envelope back == | ||
{{Col-begin|width=98%}} | {{Col-begin|width=98%}} | ||
{{Col-break|width=55%}} | {{Col-break|width=55%}} | ||
{{Col-break|width=3%}} | |||
{{Col-break|width=15%}} | {{Col-break|width=15%}} | ||
[ | [http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-0_Envelope_6620.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-0_Envelope_6620_thm.jpg] | ||
{{Col-break|width=30%}} | {{Col-break|width=30%}} | ||
'''NOTES:''' | '''NOTES:''' | ||
* | * British Museum marking stamped in red. | ||
* London W postmark for March 26, 1881. | |||
{{Col-end}} | {{Col-end}} | ||
== Page 1 transcription, image, and notes == | == Page 1 transcription, image, and notes == | ||
Line 57: | Line 73: | ||
Your future book is a little jewel; and, small and tiny as it is, it may, one day, be found to soar as high as Mount Everest over your Simla hills. Among all other works of that class, in the wild jungle of [[Spiritualism|Spiritualistic]] literature, it shall undoubtedly prove the Redeemer, offered as a sacrifice for the sin of the world of [[Spiritualism|Spiritualists]]. They will begin by rejecting — nay — vilifying it; but, it will find its faithful twelve and — the seed thrown by your hand into the soil of speculation will not grow up as a weed. So far may be promised. You are oft too cautious. You remind too often the reader of your ignorance; and presenting but as a modest theory, that, which at the bottom of your heart you know and feel to be an axiom, a primary truth — instead of helping, you but perplex him and — create doubt. But it is a spirited and discriminative little memoir, and, as a critical estimate of the [[phenomena]] witnessed by | Your future book is a little jewel; and, small and tiny as it is, it may, one day, be found to soar as high as Mount Everest over your Simla hills. Among all other works of that class, in the wild jungle of [[Spiritualism|Spiritualistic]] literature, it shall undoubtedly prove the Redeemer, offered as a sacrifice for the sin of the world of [[Spiritualism|Spiritualists]]. They will begin by rejecting — nay — vilifying it; but, it will find its faithful twelve and — the seed thrown by your hand into the soil of speculation will not grow up as a weed. So far may be promised. You are oft too cautious. You remind too often the reader of your ignorance; and presenting but as a modest theory, that, which at the bottom of your heart you know and feel to be an axiom, a primary truth — instead of helping, you but perplex him and — create doubt. But it is a spirited and discriminative little memoir, and, as a critical estimate of the [[phenomena]] witnessed by | ||
{{Col-break|width=3%}} | |||
{{Col-break|width=15%}} | {{Col-break|width=15%}} | ||
[ | [http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-1_6621.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-1_6621_thm.jpg] | ||
{{Col-break|width=30%}} | {{Col-break|width=30%}} | ||
'''NOTES:''' | '''NOTES:''' | ||
* Terich-Mir (alternatively Tirich Mir, Terichmir and Turch Mir) is the highest mountain in the Hindu Kush region located what today is Pakistan. The | * Terich-Mir (alternatively Tirich Mir, Terichmir and Turch Mir) is the highest mountain in the Hindu Kush region located what today is Pakistan. It has an elevation of 25,289 ft (7,708 m). The first recorded climbing was in 1950. | ||
* "n'est-ce pas" is French for "is it not?" | * "n'est-ce pas" is French for "is it not?" | ||
* "Your future book" refers to [[A. P. Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]]'s book ''[[The Occult World (book)|The Occult World]]''. | * "Your future book" refers to [[A. P. Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]]'s book ''[[The Occult World (book)|The Occult World]]''. | ||
Line 72: | Line 89: | ||
{{Col-begin|width=98%}} | {{Col-begin|width=98%}} | ||
{{Col-break|width=55%}} | {{Col-break|width=55%}} | ||
you personally far more useful than Mr. Wallace's work. It is at this sort of springs that [[Spiritualism|Spiritualists]] ought to be compelled to slake their thirst for [[phenomena]] and [[Mysticism|mystic]] knowledge instead of being left to swallow the idiotic gush they find in the Banners of Light and others. The world — meaning that of individual existences — is full of those latent meanings and deep purposes which underlie all the phenomena of the Universe, and [[Occult Science]]s — i.e., reason elevated to super-sensuous Wisdom — can alone furnish the key wherewith to unlock them to the intellect. Believe me, there comes a moment in the life of an [[adept]], when the hardships he has passed through are a thousandfold rewarded. In order to acquire further knowledge, he has no more to go through a minute and slow process of investigation and comparison of various objects, but is accorded an instantaneous, implicit insight into every first truth. Having passed that stage of philosophy which maintains that all fundamental truths have sprung from a blind impulse — it is the philosophy of your Sensationalists or Positivists; and left far behind him that other class of thinkers — the Intellectualists or Skeptics — who hold that fundamental truths are derived from the intellect alone, and that we, ourselves, are their only originating causes; the [[adept]] sees and feels and lives in the very source of all fundamental truths — the Universal Spiritual Essence of Nature, [[SHIVA]] the Creator, the Destroyer, and the Regenerator. As [[Spiritualism|Spiritualists]] of to-day have degraded "Spirit," so have the [[Hinduism|Hindus]] degraded Nature by their anthropormorphistic conceptions of it. Nature alone can incarnate the Spirit of limitless contemplation. "Absorbed in the absolute self-unconsciousness of physical Self, plunged in the depths of true Being, which | you personally far more useful than Mr. Wallace's work. It is at this sort of springs that [[Spiritualism|Spiritualists]] ought to be compelled to slake their thirst for [[phenomena]] and [[Mysticism|mystic]] knowledge instead of being left to swallow the idiotic gush they find in the Banners of Light and others. The world — meaning that of individual existences — is full of those latent meanings and deep purposes which underlie all the phenomena of the Universe, and [[Occult Science]]s — i.e., reason elevated to super-sensuous [[Wisdom]] — can alone furnish the key wherewith to unlock them to the intellect. Believe me, there comes a moment in the life of an [[adept]], when the hardships he has passed through are a thousandfold rewarded. In order to acquire further knowledge, he has no more to go through a minute and slow process of investigation and comparison of various objects, but is accorded an instantaneous, implicit insight into every first truth. Having passed that stage of philosophy which maintains that all fundamental truths have sprung from a blind impulse — it is the philosophy of your Sensationalists or Positivists; and left far behind him that other class of thinkers — the Intellectualists or Skeptics — who hold that fundamental truths are derived from the intellect alone, and that we, ourselves, are their only originating causes; the [[adept]] sees and feels and lives in the very source of all fundamental truths — the Universal Spiritual Essence of Nature, [[SHIVA]] the Creator, the Destroyer, and the Regenerator. As [[Spiritualism|Spiritualists]] of to-day have degraded "Spirit," so have the [[Hinduism|Hindus]] degraded Nature by their anthropormorphistic conceptions of it. Nature alone can incarnate the Spirit of limitless contemplation. "Absorbed in the absolute self-unconsciousness of physical Self, plunged in the depths of true Being, which | ||
{{Col-break|width=3%}} | |||
{{Col-break|width=15%}} | {{Col-break|width=15%}} | ||
[ | [http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-2_6622.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-2_6622_thm.jpg] | ||
{{Col-break|width=30%}} | {{Col-break|width=30%}} | ||
'''NOTES:''' | '''NOTES:''' | ||
* "Mr. Wallace's work": Probably refers to [[Alfred | * "Mr. Wallace's work": Probably refers to [[Alfred Russel Wallace]]'s book ''Miracles and Modern Spiritualism'', first published in 1874. | ||
* ''The Banner of Light'' was a Spiritualist newspaper founded by Luther Colby of Boston in 1857. The weekly newspaper proclaimed itself to be an “exponent of Spiritual philosophy of the 19th century,” and had the largest and longest circulation of any Spiritualist newspaper in the world. It ceased publication after 1910. | * [[The Banner of Light (periodical)|''The Banner of Light'']] was a [[Spiritualism|Spiritualist]] newspaper founded by Luther Colby of Boston in 1857. The weekly newspaper proclaimed itself to be an “exponent of Spiritual philosophy of the 19th century,” and had the largest and longest circulation of any Spiritualist newspaper in the world. It ceased publication after 1910. | ||
{{Col-end}} | {{Col-end}} | ||
Line 88: | Line 106: | ||
{{Col-begin|width=98%}} | {{Col-begin|width=98%}} | ||
{{Col-break|width=55%}} | {{Col-break|width=55%}} | ||
is no being but [[eternity|eternal]], universal Life," his whole form as immoveable and white as the eternal summits of snow in Kailasa where he sits, above care, above sorrow, above sin and worldliness, a mendicant, a sage, a healer, the King of Kings, the Yogi of Yogis," such is the ideal [[Shiva]] of [[Yoga]] Shastras the culmination of Spiritual Wisdom. . . . Oh, ye Max Mullers and Monier Williamses, what have ye done with our Philosophy! | is no being but [[eternity|eternal]], universal Life," his whole form as immoveable and white as the eternal summits of snow in Kailasa where he sits, above care, above sorrow, above sin and worldliness, a mendicant, a sage, a healer, the King of Kings, the Yogi of Yogis," such is the ideal [[Shiva]] of [[Yoga]] Shastras the culmination of [[Wisdom#Divine wisdom|Spiritual Wisdom]]. . . . Oh, ye [[Max Müller|Max Mullers]] and [[Monier Monier-Williams|Monier Williamses]], what have ye done with our Philosophy! | ||
But you can hardly be expected to enjoy or even understand the above phanerosis of our teachings. Pardon me. I write but seldom letters; and whenever compelled to do so follow rather my own thoughts than strictly hold to the subject I ought to have in view. I have laboured for more than a quarter of a century night and day to keep my place within the ranks of that invisible but ever busy army which labours and prepares for a task which can bring no reward but the consciousness that we are doing our duty to humanity; and, meeting you on my way I have tried to — do not fear, — not to enroll you, for that would be impossible, but to simply draw your attention, excite your curiosity if not your better feelings to the one and only truth. You proved faithful and true, and have done your best. If your efforts will teach the world but one single letter from the alphabet of Truth — that Truth which once pervaded the whole world — your reward will not miss you. And now that you have met the "mystics" of Paris and London what do you think of them? . . . | But you can hardly be expected to enjoy or even understand the above phanerosis of our teachings. Pardon me. I write but seldom letters; and whenever compelled to do so follow rather my own thoughts than strictly hold to the subject I ought to have in view. I have laboured for more than a quarter of a century night and day to keep my place within the ranks of that invisible but ever busy army which labours and prepares for a task which can bring no reward but the consciousness that we are doing our duty to humanity; and, meeting you on my way I have tried to — do not fear, — not to enroll you, for that would be impossible, but to simply draw your attention, excite your curiosity if not your better feelings to the one and only truth. You proved faithful and true, and have done your best. If your efforts will teach the world but one single letter from the alphabet of Truth — that Truth which once pervaded the whole world — your reward will not miss you. And now that you have met the "mystics" of Paris and London what do you think of them? . . . | ||
Line 97: | Line 115: | ||
P.S. — Our hapless "[[H. P. Blavatsky|Old Lady]]" is sick. Liver, kidneys, head, brain, legs, every organ and limb shows fight and snaps its fingers at her efforts to ignore them. One of us will have to "fix her" as our worthy [[H. S. Olcott|Mr. Olcott]] says, or it will fare bad with her. | P.S. — Our hapless "[[H. P. Blavatsky|Old Lady]]" is sick. Liver, kidneys, head, brain, legs, every organ and limb shows fight and snaps its fingers at her efforts to ignore them. One of us will have to "fix her" as our worthy [[H. S. Olcott|Mr. Olcott]] says, or it will fare bad with her. | ||
{{Col-break|width=3%}} | |||
{{Col-break|width=15%}} | {{Col-break|width=15%}} | ||
[ | [http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-3_6623.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/17-3_6623_thm.jpg] | ||
{{Col-break|width=30%}} | {{Col-break|width=30%}} | ||
'''NOTES:''' | '''NOTES:''' | ||
* Kailasa: Mount Kailash, is a peak in the Transhimalaya mountain range in Tibet. It is considered a sacred place in Bön, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism. In Hinduism, it is considered to be the abode of Lord Shiva and a place of eternal bliss. | * '''Kailasa''': Mount Kailash, is a peak in the Transhimalaya mountain range in Tibet. It is considered a sacred place in Bön, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism. In Hinduism, it is considered to be the abode of Lord Shiva and a place of eternal bliss. | ||
* Max Muller and Monier Williams were orientalists regarded among the founders of the western academic field of Indian studies. | * '''Max Muller''' and '''Monier Williams''' were orientalists regarded among the founders of the western academic field of Indian studies. Blavatsky and the Masters were critical of their interpretation of Hindu and Buddhis philosophy, a criticism now accepted by modern academia: "Scholars usually agree that during that period the interest and study of Buddhism reflected Victorian values more than a genuine understanding of Asian Buddhism."<ref>Asaf Federman (2015): Buddhist meditation in Britain: 1853 and 1945, Religion, DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2015.1027969</ref> | ||
{{Col-end}} | {{Col-end}} | ||
== Context and background == | == Context and background == | ||
This appears to be the only letter received by [[A. P. Sinnett]] from the [[Mahātma|Mahatma]] while he was in England. The envelope in which it was enclosed is with the original letter in the British museum. | |||
[[Geoffrey A. Barborka]] suggests that the Mahatma composed the letter and transmitted it from Terich-Mir, where he was at the time, to an [[adept]] member of the Fraternity somewhere in France. This adept then, Mr. Barborka believes, put it in an envelope to which he affixed a French postage stamp and mailed it by regular post. | |||
Another possibility is that it was [[Precipitation|transmitted telepathically]] to a [[chela]] living in France, who wrote it out and posted it to Sinnett. | |||
== Physical description of letter == | == Physical description of letter == | ||
The original is in the British Library, Folio 2. According to [[George Linton]] and [[Virginia Hanson]], | |||
<blockquote> | |||
In blue ink on two sheets of white paper, both sides, in fine lettering. The transmittal envelope is in the British Museum Folio. It is addressed to "A. P. Sinnett, Es. F. T. S., c/o Herbert Stacks, 30 Kensington Park Gardens, London." There is a 35c French postage stamp affixed to the lower right-hand corner of the envelope. The script on the envelope is entirely different from that of the letter.<ref>George E. Linton and Virginia Hanson, eds., ''Readers Guide to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett'' (Adyar, Chennai, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 58.</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
[[J. Herbert Stack]] was a member of the [[Society for Psychical Research]].<ref>"List of Members and Associates," ''SPR Proceedings'', (December 1884), 317. Available at [http://www.iapsop.com/archive/materials/spr_proceedings/spr_proceedings_v2_officers_and_members_1884.pdf International Association for the Preservation of Occult and Spiritualist Periodicals].</ref> | |||
== Publication history == | == Publication history == | ||
Line 122: | Line 150: | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:ML from Koot Hoomi]] | |||
[[Category:ML to A. P. Sinnett]] | |||
[[Category:ML with images]] | |||
[[Category:ML needs commentary]] | |||
[[es:Carta de los Mahatmas No. 17]] | |||
[[it:Lettera dei Mahatma n° 31]] |
Latest revision as of 21:59, 13 May 2022
Quick Facts | |
---|---|
People involved | |
Written by: | Koot Hoomi |
Received by: | A. P. Sinnett |
Sent via: | adept in France |
Dates | |
Written on: | unknown |
Received on: | March 26,1881 |
Other dates: | unknown |
Places | |
Sent from: | Terich-Mir |
Received at: | London |
Via: | unknown |
This is Letter No. 17 in The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, 4th chronological edition. It corresponds to Letter No. 31 in Barker numbering. See below for Context and background.
< Prev letter chrono
Next letter chrono >
< Prev letter Barker
Next letter Barker >
Envelope
England. |
NOTES:
|
Envelope back
NOTES:
|
Page 1 transcription, image, and notes
Received London, March 26th, 1881. It is from the depths of an unknown valley, amid the steep crags and glaciers of Terich-Mir — a vale never trodden by European foot since the day its parent mount was itself breathed out from within our Mother Earth's bosom — that your friend sends you these lines. For, it is there K.H. received your "Affectionate homages," and there he intends passing his "summer vacations." A letter "from the abodes of eternal snow and purity" sent to and received — "At the abodes of vice"! . . . Queer, n'est-ce pas? Would, or rather could I be with you at those "abodes"? No; but I was at several different times, elsewhere, though neither in "astral" nor in any other tangible form, but simply in thought. Does not satisfy you? Well, well, you know the limitations I am subjected to in your case, and you must have patience. Your future book is a little jewel; and, small and tiny as it is, it may, one day, be found to soar as high as Mount Everest over your Simla hills. Among all other works of that class, in the wild jungle of Spiritualistic literature, it shall undoubtedly prove the Redeemer, offered as a sacrifice for the sin of the world of Spiritualists. They will begin by rejecting — nay — vilifying it; but, it will find its faithful twelve and — the seed thrown by your hand into the soil of speculation will not grow up as a weed. So far may be promised. You are oft too cautious. You remind too often the reader of your ignorance; and presenting but as a modest theory, that, which at the bottom of your heart you know and feel to be an axiom, a primary truth — instead of helping, you but perplex him and — create doubt. But it is a spirited and discriminative little memoir, and, as a critical estimate of the phenomena witnessed by |
NOTES:
|
Page 2
you personally far more useful than Mr. Wallace's work. It is at this sort of springs that Spiritualists ought to be compelled to slake their thirst for phenomena and mystic knowledge instead of being left to swallow the idiotic gush they find in the Banners of Light and others. The world — meaning that of individual existences — is full of those latent meanings and deep purposes which underlie all the phenomena of the Universe, and Occult Sciences — i.e., reason elevated to super-sensuous Wisdom — can alone furnish the key wherewith to unlock them to the intellect. Believe me, there comes a moment in the life of an adept, when the hardships he has passed through are a thousandfold rewarded. In order to acquire further knowledge, he has no more to go through a minute and slow process of investigation and comparison of various objects, but is accorded an instantaneous, implicit insight into every first truth. Having passed that stage of philosophy which maintains that all fundamental truths have sprung from a blind impulse — it is the philosophy of your Sensationalists or Positivists; and left far behind him that other class of thinkers — the Intellectualists or Skeptics — who hold that fundamental truths are derived from the intellect alone, and that we, ourselves, are their only originating causes; the adept sees and feels and lives in the very source of all fundamental truths — the Universal Spiritual Essence of Nature, SHIVA the Creator, the Destroyer, and the Regenerator. As Spiritualists of to-day have degraded "Spirit," so have the Hindus degraded Nature by their anthropormorphistic conceptions of it. Nature alone can incarnate the Spirit of limitless contemplation. "Absorbed in the absolute self-unconsciousness of physical Self, plunged in the depths of true Being, which |
NOTES:
|
Page 3
is no being but eternal, universal Life," his whole form as immoveable and white as the eternal summits of snow in Kailasa where he sits, above care, above sorrow, above sin and worldliness, a mendicant, a sage, a healer, the King of Kings, the Yogi of Yogis," such is the ideal Shiva of Yoga Shastras the culmination of Spiritual Wisdom. . . . Oh, ye Max Mullers and Monier Williamses, what have ye done with our Philosophy! But you can hardly be expected to enjoy or even understand the above phanerosis of our teachings. Pardon me. I write but seldom letters; and whenever compelled to do so follow rather my own thoughts than strictly hold to the subject I ought to have in view. I have laboured for more than a quarter of a century night and day to keep my place within the ranks of that invisible but ever busy army which labours and prepares for a task which can bring no reward but the consciousness that we are doing our duty to humanity; and, meeting you on my way I have tried to — do not fear, — not to enroll you, for that would be impossible, but to simply draw your attention, excite your curiosity if not your better feelings to the one and only truth. You proved faithful and true, and have done your best. If your efforts will teach the world but one single letter from the alphabet of Truth — that Truth which once pervaded the whole world — your reward will not miss you. And now that you have met the "mystics" of Paris and London what do you think of them? . . . Yours, P.S. — Our hapless "Old Lady" is sick. Liver, kidneys, head, brain, legs, every organ and limb shows fight and snaps its fingers at her efforts to ignore them. One of us will have to "fix her" as our worthy Mr. Olcott says, or it will fare bad with her. |
NOTES:
|
Context and background
This appears to be the only letter received by A. P. Sinnett from the Mahatma while he was in England. The envelope in which it was enclosed is with the original letter in the British museum.
Geoffrey A. Barborka suggests that the Mahatma composed the letter and transmitted it from Terich-Mir, where he was at the time, to an adept member of the Fraternity somewhere in France. This adept then, Mr. Barborka believes, put it in an envelope to which he affixed a French postage stamp and mailed it by regular post.
Another possibility is that it was transmitted telepathically to a chela living in France, who wrote it out and posted it to Sinnett.
Physical description of letter
The original is in the British Library, Folio 2. According to George Linton and Virginia Hanson,
In blue ink on two sheets of white paper, both sides, in fine lettering. The transmittal envelope is in the British Museum Folio. It is addressed to "A. P. Sinnett, Es. F. T. S., c/o Herbert Stacks, 30 Kensington Park Gardens, London." There is a 35c French postage stamp affixed to the lower right-hand corner of the envelope. The script on the envelope is entirely different from that of the letter.[2]
J. Herbert Stack was a member of the Society for Psychical Research.[3]
Publication history
Commentary about this letter
Notes
- ↑ Asaf Federman (2015): Buddhist meditation in Britain: 1853 and 1945, Religion, DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2015.1027969
- ↑ George E. Linton and Virginia Hanson, eds., Readers Guide to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (Adyar, Chennai, India: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 58.
- ↑ "List of Members and Associates," SPR Proceedings, (December 1884), 317. Available at International Association for the Preservation of Occult and Spiritualist Periodicals.