Mahatma Letter of Finch to Sinnett - 1883-12-21: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| otherdate        = unknown
| otherdate        = unknown
| header3 = Places
| header3 = Places
| sentfrom          = unknown
| sentfrom          = London
| receivedat        = unknown
| receivedat        = unknown
| vialocation      = unknown  
| vialocation      = unknown  
Line 15: Line 15:
This letter has not been published previously. [[G. B. Finch]] wrote to [[A. P. Sinnett]], who forwarded it to [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi]], via [[H. P. Blavatsky]], "for considerations." KH instructed HPB to keep the letter and to show [[Mohini Mohun Chatterji|Mohini]]. Finch provided a nuanced view of the [[London Lodge]] before its split, and of [[Anna Bonus Kingsford]] and [[Edward Maitland]].
This letter has not been published previously. [[G. B. Finch]] wrote to [[A. P. Sinnett]], who forwarded it to [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi]], via [[H. P. Blavatsky]], "for considerations." KH instructed HPB to keep the letter and to show [[Mohini Mohun Chatterji|Mohini]]. Finch provided a nuanced view of the [[London Lodge]] before its split, and of [[Anna Bonus Kingsford]] and [[Edward Maitland]].


== Notes to H. P. Blavatsky from K.H. ==
== Note to H. P. Blavatsky from K.H. ==


{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''Note written in blue ink in KH handwriting at the top of the first page:'''<br>
'''Note written in blue ink in KH handwriting on final page:'''<br>


For Upasikaa to preserve KH<br>
File with the other letters – let Mohini see. KH<br>
 
'''Underscores written in blue ink in KH handwriting at the bottom of the fourth page:'''<br>
 
<u>I wrote Col. O. from Capri</u> [underlined in blue] that I would come if you approved I got no <u>notice until yesterday</u> [underlined in blue] of your assent.


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
Line 31: Line 27:
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}


[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_1_KHnote.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_1_KHnote_thm.jpg]<br>
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_4_KHnote.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_4_KHnote_thm.jpg]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_4_KHnote.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_4_KHnote_thm.jpg]  


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
Line 41: Line 36:
{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 1 of Ward letter transcription, image, and notes ==
== Page 1 of Finch letter transcription, image, and notes ==


{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
36 Piccadilly<br>  
'''Note at top left corner in Sinnett’s handwriting:'''<br>
14 Dec 1883


My dear and revered friend,
Just received by APS and forwarded for consideration


I have not written lately because I feared what your patience who know so fully the human causes that have arisen to sow dissension in our camp at which I fervently believe you now and then take a look of scrutiny realising at a glance more than pen can describe.
24 Old Square,<br>
Lincoln’s Inn.<br>
21st Dec. 1883.<br>


Alas! if Astronomers in the observatory are compelled to take into account what they call the “human equation” how much more needful is it to estimate that irregularity where undisciplined ambitions and mixed motives combined as perturbing forces.
My dear Sinnett,


I never have ceased to venerate the lofty soar of our [[Anna Bonus Kingsford|Seeress]],- but from the first I have despaired of her ever becoming a teacher to a large congregation. This arises
What I wished to convey last night when you read us your letter to the [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi]] was that your presentation of [[Anna Bonus Kingsford|Mrs. Kingsford]] applied rather to Mrs. Kingsford under the influence of [[Edward Maitland|Mr. Maitland]] than to her native self. Left to herself even, she has weaknesses but these are as nothing when compared with her wonderful gifts. These gifts would be of the greatest value in a president of our [[London Lodge|Lodge]], but under Mr. Maitland’s influence they fail to be of any real service, and her continuance in the presidency under that influence is, in my opinion, unadvisable. I should be sorry to lose her from the Society, but if she is only to be kept as the [illegible] of such pamphlets as the one lately given to us [inserted between lines] I would say to her “Go in peace.” [end insertion] It is possible that the side of her character which allows her to fall under such a direction as Maitland’s may always operate to mar her usefulness, and if she is only capable of presenting the


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
Line 60: Line 56:
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}


[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_1.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_1_thm.jpg]  
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_1.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_1_thm.jpg]  


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
* '''Seeress''' refers to [[Anna Bonus Kingsford]].
*  


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 73: Line 69:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
quite as much from the elevation of the plane her spirit has attained as from any defects inherent in her sex. I can conceive the inability of Newton or Huyghens [Christiaan Huygens – 1600s scientist] to teach a schoolboy the binomial theorem, and my friend the late Professor Pervie of Harvard who dwelt among the Himalayan Mountaintops of the higher Analysis was noted for his incompetency to impart a spark of his love to any save the 3 or 4 exceptional students in a large class.
religious aspect of [[Theosophy]] she will never as President form an enduring society. It is possible that in the realm she pierces lie the generalizations of the particulars with which we in England are concerning ourselves, but for us the study of particulars seems to be the only road to these higher truths. [[Esoteric Buddhism (book)|"Esoteric Buddhism"]] with its detailed information make more Theosophists than [[The Perfect Way (book)|"The Perfect Way."]] It gives us a firm foundation for the guidance of our lives, and a sphere of study which while adapted to our capacities elevates them. If Mrs. Kingsford’s most unwise suggestion, that the [[London Lodge|Lodge]] should he divided into two schools, was adopted, and if the [[Mahatma|Mahatmas]], whom we have learned to regard not merely with respect but love, would send in further teachings of the same kind, that is, details which are as the landmark of the Path to the Divine, I have no fear that “Mr. Sinnett’s” school would be for the greatest aid to the Theosophic movement here.


I think we shall tide over the difficulty which Massey suggests might be compromised by the election of Mr. Hood or some other advanced member as President and thus retain both Mrs K and the OL’s [Old Lady’s] “Boss” without the Scandal of a spasmodic disruption. He would propose to follow this up by a division of the T.S., like the British Association into branches who may pursue ‘Esoteric Buddhism’ under Sinnett,- or ‘Esoteric Christianity’ under the Seeress.
Yours sincerely,


But the latter is in precarious
G.B. Finch


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
Line 83: Line 79:
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}


[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_2.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_2_thm.jpg]  
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_2.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_2_thm.jpg]  


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*  
* [[The Perfect Way (book)|''The Perfect Way'']] was a book written by Dr. Kingsford and Mr. Maitland.
* [[Esoteric Buddhism (book)|''Esoteric Buddhism'']] was a book published by Sinnett in June, 1883.


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 3 ==
== Page 3 - Postscript ==


{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
P.S. I may add that most of us do not look favorably on the notion of a split in the camp &ndash; which would divide the Society openly and nominally into divergent parties. That is quite unlike my notion of an inner circle.


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
Line 102: Line 99:
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}


[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_3.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH5_3_thm.jpg]  
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_3.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/UnpubKH3_3_thm.jpg]  


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
Line 111: Line 108:
{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 4 ==
== Page 4 notes ==


{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
Line 139: Line 136:
== Context and background ==
== Context and background ==


This letter was written about six months earlier than the important correspondence between members of the [[London Lodge]] (including Finch) and the [[Mahatma|Mahatmas]], which was published as '''[[Mahatma_Letter_to_London_Lodge_-_LMW_1_No._5|Letter No. 5]]''' in [[Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom|''Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom, First Series'']]. On April 7, 1884, Mr. Finch was elected as President of the lodge, with [[A. P. Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]] as Vice-President and Secretary, and [[Francesca Arundale|Miss Francesca Arundale]] as Treasurer. [[Henry Steel Olcott|Col. Olcott]], international President of the [[Theosophical Society]], who was visiting London with his personal secretary [[Mohini Mohun Chatterji|Mohini]], granted a charter for the Kingsford-Maitland contingent to form a separate Branch, the [[Hermetic Lodge]].
This letter was written about eight months earlier than the important correspondence between members of the [[London Lodge]] (including Finch) and the [[Mahatma|Mahatmas]], which was published as '''[[Mahatma_Letter_to_London_Lodge_-_LMW_1_No._5|Letter No. 5]]''' in [[Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom|''Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom, First Series'']]. On April 7, 1884, Mr. Finch was elected as President of the lodge, with [[A. P. Sinnett|Mr. Sinnett]] as Vice-President and Secretary, and [[Francesca Arundale|Miss Francesca Arundale]] as Treasurer. [[Henry Steel Olcott|Col. Olcott]], international President of the [[Theosophical Society]], who was visiting London with his personal secretary [[Mohini Mohun Chatterji|Mohini]], granted a charter for the Kingsford-Maitland contingent to form a separate Branch, the [[Hermetic Lodge]].


== Physical description of letter ==
== Physical description of letter ==

Latest revision as of 15:47, 14 April 2022

Quick Facts
People involved
Written by: G. B. Finch, A. P. Sinnett, Koot Hoomi
Received by: A. P. Sinnett, Koot Hoomi, H. P. Blavatsky
Sent via: unknown 
Dates
Written on: 12 December 1883
Received on: unknown
Other dates: unknown
Places
Sent from: London
Received at: unknown
Via: unknown

This letter has not been published previously. G. B. Finch wrote to A. P. Sinnett, who forwarded it to Mahatma Koot Hoomi, via H. P. Blavatsky, "for considerations." KH instructed HPB to keep the letter and to show Mohini. Finch provided a nuanced view of the London Lodge before its split, and of Anna Bonus Kingsford and Edward Maitland.

Note to H. P. Blavatsky from K.H.

Note written in blue ink in KH handwriting on final page:

File with the other letters – let Mohini see. KH

UnpubKH3_4_KHnote_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 1 of Finch letter transcription, image, and notes

Note at top left corner in Sinnett’s handwriting:

Just received by APS and forwarded for consideration

24 Old Square,
Lincoln’s Inn.
21st Dec. 1883.

My dear Sinnett,

What I wished to convey last night when you read us your letter to the Mahatma Koot Hoomi was that your presentation of Mrs. Kingsford applied rather to Mrs. Kingsford under the influence of Mr. Maitland than to her native self. Left to herself even, she has weaknesses but these are as nothing when compared with her wonderful gifts. These gifts would be of the greatest value in a president of our Lodge, but under Mr. Maitland’s influence they fail to be of any real service, and her continuance in the presidency under that influence is, in my opinion, unadvisable. I should be sorry to lose her from the Society, but if she is only to be kept as the [illegible] of such pamphlets as the one lately given to us [inserted between lines] I would say to her “Go in peace.” [end insertion] It is possible that the side of her character which allows her to fall under such a direction as Maitland’s may always operate to mar her usefulness, and if she is only capable of presenting the

UnpubKH3_1_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 2

religious aspect of Theosophy she will never as President form an enduring society. It is possible that in the realm she pierces lie the generalizations of the particulars with which we in England are concerning ourselves, but for us the study of particulars seems to be the only road to these higher truths. "Esoteric Buddhism" with its detailed information make more Theosophists than "The Perfect Way." It gives us a firm foundation for the guidance of our lives, and a sphere of study which while adapted to our capacities elevates them. If Mrs. Kingsford’s most unwise suggestion, that the Lodge should he divided into two schools, was adopted, and if the Mahatmas, whom we have learned to regard not merely with respect but love, would send in further teachings of the same kind, that is, details which are as the landmark of the Path to the Divine, I have no fear that “Mr. Sinnett’s” school would be for the greatest aid to the Theosophic movement here.

Yours sincerely,

G.B. Finch

UnpubKH3_2_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 3 - Postscript

P.S. I may add that most of us do not look favorably on the notion of a split in the camp – which would divide the Society openly and nominally into divergent parties. That is quite unlike my notion of an inner circle.

UnpubKH3_3_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 4 notes

Written across middle of page in Sinnett’s script:

Mahatma K.H.

Written in blue ink in KH handwriting:

File with the other letters – let Mohini see. KH

UnpubKH3_4_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Context and background

This letter was written about eight months earlier than the important correspondence between members of the London Lodge (including Finch) and the Mahatmas, which was published as Letter No. 5 in Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom, First Series. On April 7, 1884, Mr. Finch was elected as President of the lodge, with Mr. Sinnett as Vice-President and Secretary, and Miss Francesca Arundale as Treasurer. Col. Olcott, international President of the Theosophical Society, who was visiting London with his personal secretary Mohini, granted a charter for the Kingsford-Maitland contingent to form a separate Branch, the Hermetic Lodge.

Physical description of letter

One sheet of paper was folded and written on both sides. Notation by K.H. is in blue ink. This letter is in a private collection.

Publication history

This letter has never been published before.

Commentary about this letter

The chief significance of this letter is that K.H. recognized it as an important communication about interactions within the London Lodge, and therefore instructed Madame Blavatsky to preserve it.

Additional resources

Notes