Cosmological Notes: Difference between revisions

From Theosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Spelling correction " proposesed" to "proposed".)
 
(135 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[ARTICLE UNDER CONSTRUCTION]'''
'''[ARTICLE UNDER CONSTRUCTION]'''
{{Template:Article needs expansion}}
<br>
<br>
<br>
{{Infobox MLbox
{{Infobox MLbox
| header1 = People involved |
| header1 = People involved |
| writtenby        = [[Morya]]
| writtenby        = [[Morya]]
| receivedby        = [[A. O. Hume]]
| receivedby        = [[A. O. Hume]]
| sentvia          = unknown
| sentvia          = [[H. P. Blavatsky]]
| header2 = Dates
| header2 = Dates
| writtendate      = unknown
| writtendate      = unknown
| receiveddate      = Fall 1881???
| receiveddate      = Probably October 1881
| otherdate        = none
| otherdate        = none
| header3 = Places
| header3 = Places
| sentfrom          = unknown
| sentfrom          = unknown
| receivedat        = ??? 
| receivedat        = Simla
| vialocation      = none
| vialocation      = none
}}
}}
'''The Cosmological Notes were published as ''LBS-Appendix II'' in the chronological edition of ''The Mahatma Letters''.''' They were produced before [[Mahatma Letter No. 29]]. See [[Cosmological Notes#History|below]].


== History ==
== History ==


The Cosmological notes were written by [[Morya|Master M.]] in answer to questions put by [[A. O. Hume]]. They must have been received before September 1881 because they are mentioned by [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|HPB]] in a letter to [[Alfred Percy Sinnett|A. P. Sinnett]] written on that date (see [[The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett (book)|LBS]] No. 4). In the chronology of [[Mahatma Letters]], one could tentatively place these notes between letters [[ML21|No. 21]] and [[ML22|22]]. However, since letter [[ML44|No. 44]] is the first one to deal exclusively with metaphysics, being actually a second set of cosmological teachings.
The Cosmological notes were given by [[Morya|Master M.]] in answer to questions put by [[A. O. Hume]] and [[A. P. Sinnett]]. It seems the notes were produced by means of a number of literary exchanges with the Master and conversations held with [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|H. P. Blavatsky]], who was a guest of the Humes at the time. As Sinnett recalls:
 
<blockquote>We appointed times each day for these efforts and I still have the M.S. book in which I recorded the results, of a very unsatisfactory character. Some extracts from the volume will show the way we struggled with our difficulties. My notes as they stand are put in the form of question and answer, the questions being rather the outcome of previous conversation than deliberately formulated by ourselves.​<ref>See [https://cdn.website-editor.net/e4d6563c50794969b714ab70457d9761/files/uploaded/EarlyDaysOfTheosophyInEurope%2CThe_APSinnett.pdf# ''The Early Days of Theosophy in Europe.''], pp. 14-15, by A. P. Sinnett</ref></blockquote>


[[Fritz Kunz]] asked [[Boris de Zirkoff]] in a letter on the origin of the cosmological notes:
The Cosmological material started in late Sept. 1881 (probably after [[Koot Hoomi|Master K.H.]] went into his retreat) and took place from two or three weeks, ending around October 18, when Sinnett left to return to Allahabad.
<blockquote>
I know that you have a set of the microfilmed copy of the material in the British Museum catalogued under the heading of the "Mahatma Letters."
<br>
I wonder whether you would be so good as to advise me whether the pages entitled "Cosmological Notes" which are published near the very end of H.P.B.'s letter to A. P. Sinnett, are included therein, and if so, in whose handwriting, and whether you could kindly supply me with a sufficiently enlarged print of this so that I might have it at hand for my personal use? <ref>Letter of Fritz Kunz to Boris de Zirkoff. December 14, 1956. Boris de Zirkoff Papers. Records Series 22. Theosophical Society in America Archives.</ref>
</blockquote>


Boris de Zirkoff responded:
In the chronology of [[Mahatma Letters]], one could tentatively place these notes before letter [[ML29|No. 29]]. However, since letter [[ML44|No. 44]] is a second set of cosmological teachings, these Notes could be read right before letter 44.
<blockquote>
Re the "Mahatma Papers", Additional MS.45284, in the British Museum. Now the actual Letters, both those from the Masters and those from H.P.B. to Sinnett, have been bound up in separate volumes, seven in all. The originals of <u>some</u> of the Letters from the Masters, as transcribed in the published volume of <u>Mahatma Letters</u>, were <u>not</u> among the material bequeathed by Sinnett to [[Maud Hoffman|Miss Maud Hoffman]]. They exist only as copies made by Sinnett in a separate leather-bound notebook. This notebook has been filmed also, when microfilm was prepared of the entire material. It is in this notebook that the "Cosmological Notes" are to be found; they are therefore in Sinnett's handwriting. There are 24 pages of this material.<ref>Letter of Boris de Zirkoff to Fritz Kunz. December 23, 1956. Boris de Zirkoff Papers. Records Series 22. Theosophical Society in America Archives.</ref></blockquote>


== The text ==
== The text ==


Below are the Cosmological Notes from [[A. P. Sinnett]]'s MS. Book. In italics are the questions put by [[A. O. Hume]] and the bold type are the answers received from [[Morya|Master M.]]
[[A. O. Hume]] retained the original of the Cosmological Notes, which is not extant. The copy preserved is the one [[A. P. Sinnett]] made for himself. In a letter to [[Fritz Kunz]], [[Boris de Zirkoff]] described this copy as follows:


When A. P. Sinnett's sent a copy of this manuscript to [[Francesca Arundale]] he attached some notes. By the way of an introduction he wrote:
<blockquote>The originals of <u>some</u> of the Letters from the Masters, as transcribed in the published volume of <u>Mahatma Letters</u>, were <u>not</u> among the material bequeathed by Sinnett to [[Maud Hoffman|Miss Maud Hoffman]]. They exist only as copies made by Sinnett in a separate leather-bound notebook. This notebook has been filmed also, when microfilm was prepared of the entire material. It is in this notebook that the "Cosmological Notes" are to be found; they are therefore in Sinnett's handwriting. There are 24 pages of this material.<ref>Letter of Boris de Zirkoff to Fritz Kunz. December 23, 1956. Boris de Zirkoff Papers. Records Series 22. Theosophical Society in America Archives.</ref></blockquote>


<blockquote>Notes from the Book of Kiu-te, the great repository of occult lore in the keeping of the Adepts in Tibet. I believe there are thirty or forty volumes, a great deal shown only to Initiates. What follows is merely some elementary catechism in the very beginning. We began to get these notes through Madame Blavatsky when Mr. Hume and I first set to work together . But we soon got off on to other lines of rail.<br>
We reproduce below the text of the Cosmological Notes as well as scanned images of Sinnett's MS notebook from Boris de Zirkoff's microfilm. The answers received from [[Morya|Master M.]] are in bold type. In addition, we are adding some notes that Sinnett attached to a copy of this manuscript that he sent to [[Francesca Arundale]].<ref>These were published by C. Jinarājadāsa in his book ''The Early Teachings of the Masters'', Section VI, Ethics and Philosophy, Letter No. 1.</ref> In these copy, he wrote the following introduction:
The very first thing I ever had in the way of philosophical teaching I sent you a copy of last year; it was sketch of the chain of worlds which I suppose you have somewhere still. Then we got in a fragmentary way the materials on which Hume wrote the first of the "Occult Fragments" --- that relating to the seven principles in man. It is necessary to have an absolute comprehension of that division at starting. It runs through all nature in various shapes and ways. I now copy out of my MS. Book. --- A.P. Sinnett.<ref>See [http://blavatskyarchives.com/CosmologicalNotes.htm# Cosmological Notes] at Blavatsky Study Center</ref></blockquote>
 
<blockquote>Notes from the [[Book of Kiu-te]], the great repository of [[Occultism|occult lore]] in the keeping of the [[Adept]]s in Tibet. I believe there are thirty or forty volumes, a great deal shown only to [[Initiation|Initiates]]. What follows is merely some elementary catechism in the very beginning. We began to get these notes through [[H. P. Blavatsky|Madame Blavatsky]] when [[A. O. Hume|Mr. Hume]] and I first set to work together. But we soon got off on to other lines of rail.<br>
The very first thing I ever had in the way of philosophical teaching I sent you a copy of last year; it was sketch of the chain of worlds which I suppose you have somewhere still. Then we got in a fragmentary way the materials on which Hume wrote the first of the [[Fragments of Occult Truth (article)|"Occult Fragments"]]--that relating to the [[Principle#Seven_principles_in_human_beings|seven principles in man]]. It is necessary to have an absolute comprehension of that division at starting. It runs through all nature in various shapes and ways. I now copy out of my MS. book.--A. P. Sinnett.<ref>See [http://blavatskyarchives.com/CosmologicalNotes.htm# Cosmological Notes] at Blavatsky Study Center</ref></blockquote>


Additional comments by him will be provided below in the column for "Notes".
Additional comments by him will be provided below in the column for "Notes".
Line 52: Line 42:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
''(1) What are the different kinds of knowledge?''
[1] What are the different kinds of knowledge?


'''The real ([[Dzyu|Dgyu]]) and the unreal (Dgyu-mi). Dgyu becomes [[Fohat]] when in its activity — active agent of will — electricity — no other name.'''
'''The real ([[Dzyu|Dgyu]]) and the unreal (Dgyu-mi). Dgyu becomes [[Fohat]] when in its activity — active agent of [[will]] [[electricity]] — no other name.'''




''(2) What is the difference between the two kinds of knowledge?''
[2] What is the difference between the two kinds of knowledge?


'''Real knowledge deals with eternal verities and primal causes. The unreal only with [[Māyā|illusory]] effects.'''
'''Real knowledge deals with eternal verities and primal causes. The unreal only with [[Māyā|illusory]] effects.'''
Line 64: Line 54:




''(3) Who possesses the real knowledge?''
[3] Who possesses the real knowledge?


'''The [[Lha]]s or [[adept]] alone possesses the real, his mind being en rapport'''
'''The [[Lha]]s or [[adept]] alone possesses the real, his mind being en rapport'''
Line 70: Line 60:
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-1.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-1_thm.jpg]


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 90: Line 79:




''(4) Is there any difference between what produces primal causes and their ultimate effects?''
[4] Is there any difference between what produces primal causes and their ultimate effects?


'''None. Everything in the occult universe, which embraces all the primal causes, is based upon two principles — Kosmic energy ([[Fohat]] or'''
'''None. Everything in the occult universe, which embraces all the primal causes, is based upon two principles — Kosmic energy ([[Fohat]] or'''
Line 96: Line 85:
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-2.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-2_thm.jpg]
 
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
* '''Chhag''' (''chags'') "to cause".
* After question 3, [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote: ''"As I go on copying, I see I shall have to interpolate remarks of an explanatory nature now and then. . . . I wanted to remark that you must not be giving yourself excessive trouble to commit these Tibetan words to memory. We soon got out of the way of using them."''


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 116: Line 104:




''(5) What is the one eternal thing in the universe independent of every other thing?''
[5] What is the one eternal thing in the universe independent of every other thing?


'''[[Space]].'''
'''[[Space]].'''




''(6) What things are co-existent with space?''
[6] What things are co-existent with space?


'''(i) [[Duration]].'''
'''(i) [[Duration]].'''
Line 131: Line 119:
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-3.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-3_thm.jpg]
 
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 148: Line 134:
'''When Chyang or omniscience, and Chyang-mi-shi-khon — ignorance, both sleep, this latent unconscious life still maintains the matter it animates in sleepless unceasing motion.'''
'''When Chyang or omniscience, and Chyang-mi-shi-khon — ignorance, both sleep, this latent unconscious life still maintains the matter it animates in sleepless unceasing motion.'''


'''(iv) The [[Ākāśa|Akasa]] (Bar-nang) or Kosmic atmosphere, or [[Astral Light|Astral light]] or celestial ether, which whether in its latent or active condition, surrounds and interpenetrates all matter in motion of which it is at once a result and the medium by which the Kosmic energy acts on its source.'''
'''(iv) The [[Ākāśa|Akasa]] (Bar-nang) or Kosmic atmosphere, or [[Astral Light|Astral light]] or celestial ether, which whether in its latent or active condition surrounds and interpenetrates all matter in motion of which it is at once a result and the medium by which the Kosmic energy acts on its source.'''


'''(v) The [[Puruṣa|Purush]] or [[Seventh Principle|7th principle]] of the universe.'''
'''(v) The [[Puruṣa|Purush]] or [[Seventh Principle|7th principle]] of the universe.'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-4.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-4_thm.jpg]


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
* '''Bar-nang''' (''bar-snang'') is the Tibetan word for "sky," "heaven," or "atmosphere."


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 170: Line 155:




''(7) Are we to understand [[Puruṣa|Purush]] as another name for [[space]], or as a different thing occupying every part of space?''
[7] Are we to understand [[Puruṣa|Purush]] as another name for [[space]], or as a different thing occupying every part of space?


'''Same. [[Swayambu]] occupies every part of space which itself is boundless and [[Eternity|eternal]], hence must be space in one sense. Swayambu becomes Purush when coming in contact with [[matter]].'''
'''Same. [[Swayambu]] occupies every part of space which itself is boundless and [[Eternity|eternal]], hence must be space in one sense. Swayambu becomes Purush when coming in contact with [[matter]].'''




''(8) The [[Mahat|universal]] mind is the aggregate of all the minds of the [[Dhyāni-Chohan|Dyan Chohans]] or [[Planetary Spirit|Planetaries]], the result of the''
[8] The [[Mahat|universal]] mind is the aggregate of all the minds of the [[Dhyāni-Chohan|Dyan Chohans]] or [[Planetary Spirit|Planetaries]], the result of the
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-5.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-5_thm.jpg]
 
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
* After the remark on the Ling Sharir, [[A. P. Sinnett]] adds: ''"This note, which is disconnected from the immediate subject of the paper was probably added by [[Morya|M.]] in reply to some current question asked at that time."''


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 192: Line 175:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
''action of [[Puruṣa|Purush]] on [[matter]], just as the [[Soul#Spiritual soul|spiritual soul]] in man is the action of [[spirit]] on matter?''
action of [[Puruṣa|Purush]] on [[matter]], just as the [[Soul#Spiritual soul|spiritual soul]] in man is the action of [[spirit]] on matter?


'''Yes.'''
'''Yes.'''




''(9) Are we to look upon the [[Principle|seven principles]] as all [[matter]] and all [[spirit]] — one thing, with spirit as it were at one pole, and matter at the other?''
[9] Are we to look upon the [[Principle|seven principles]] as all [[matter]] and all [[spirit]] — one thing, with spirit as it were at one pole, and matter at the other?


'''Yes, just so.'''
'''Yes, just so.'''




''(10) If so, are we to view them as different states of [[matter]] or [[spirit]], or how?''
[10]) If so, are we to view them as different states of [[matter]] or [[spirit]], or how?


'''States, conditions, call it whatever you please. I call it Kyen — cause; itself a result of a previous or some primary cause.'''
'''States, conditions, call it whatever you please. I call it Kyen — cause; itself a result of a previous or some primary cause.'''




''(11) All [[matter]] consists of ultimate molecules. How may we conceive the different states of matter?''
[11] All [[matter]] consists of ultimate molecules. How may we conceive the different states of matter?


'''As the molecules go on'''
'''As the molecules go on'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-6.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-6_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
* '''Kyen''' (''rkyen'') is a Tibetan word for "cause" or "condition."


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 225: Line 207:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''rarifying, so in proportion they become attenuated and the greater the distance between our [[globe]] and them — I do not mean here the region within the reach of your science — the greater the change in their polarity, the negative pole acquiring a stronger property of repulsion, and the positive losing gradually its power of attraction. (And now is the time for your men of [[Dzyu|Dgyu]] to set me down as a Thibetan ass, and for me to return the compliment.)'''
'''rarefying, so in proportion they become attenuated and the greater the distance between our [[globe]] and them — I do not mean here the region within the reach of your science — the greater the change in their polarity, the negative pole acquiring a stronger property of repulsion, and the positive losing gradually its power of attraction. (And now is the time for your men of [[Dzyu|Dgyu]] to set me down as a Thibetan ass, and for me to return the compliment.)'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-7.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-7_thm.jpg]
 
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 242: Line 222:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
''(12)''
 
[12] MAN
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
! Thibetan
! [[Sanskrit]]
! English
|-
|1.
|A-ku
|Rupa   
|[[Sthūla-śarīra|Body]]
|-
|2.
|Zer (vital ray)
|[[Prāṇa|Prana]]: [[Jīva#Jivatman|Jivatma]]   
|Life-principle
|-
|3.
|Chhu-lung (one of the 3 airs)
|[[Liṅga-śarīra|Ling Sharir]]
|[[Astral Body]]
|-
|4.
|Nga-Zhi (essence of Action)
|[[Kāmarūpa|Kama-Rupa]]
|Will-form
|-
|5.
|Ngë ([[Ego#Lower_ego|Physical Ego]])
|Linga Dha Bhut
|[[Soul#Animal soul|Animal Soul]]
|-
|6.
|Lana Sem-Nyed (Spiritual Soul)
|[[Ātman|Atman]] [[Māyāvi-Rūpa|Mayava-rupa]]
|[[Soul#Spiritual soul|Spiritual Soul]]
|-
|7.
|Hlün Dhüb (Self existing)
|[[Mahātma|Mahatma]]
|[[Spirit]]
|}


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-8.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-8_thm.jpg]
 
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
* [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote: "We were anxious to make out the correspondences between the [[Principle#Comparison_between_the_principles_in_human_beings_and_cosmos|seven principles of Man and of the Universe]]. [[Morya|M.]] wrote out the following table."
* [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote: ''"We were anxious to make out the correspondences between the [[Principle#Comparison_between_the_principles_in_human_beings_and_cosmos|seven principles of Man and of the Universe]]. [[Morya|M.]] wrote out the following table."''
* '''3 airs'''. In printed editions this is wrongly transcribed as "3 aims." Sinnett's "r" often looks similar to his "n," but not to his "m."
* Following is the corrected Tibetan spelling of some terms by [[David Reigle]].<ref>David Reigle, ''Blavatsky's Secret Books'' (San Diego, CA: Wizards Bookshelf, 1999), 62</ref>
:- '''A-ku''': ''sku'' (body, Skt. kāya)
:- '''Chhu-lung''': ''chhu'' [?], ''rlung'' (air, Skt. prāṇa).
:- '''Nga Zhi''': ''nga'' [the "I"], ''gzhi'' (basis)
:- '''Lana Sem-Nyed''': ''bla-na'' (above, higher, Skt. uttara), ''nyid'' (mind, heart, soul, Skt. citta), ''sems-nyid'' (Skt. cittam eva, "mind alone").
:- '''Hlün Dhüb''': ''lhun-grub'' (self-existing, without effort, Skt. anābhoga)


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 260: Line 288:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
''(12)''
 
[12] UNIVERSE
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
! Thibetan
! Sanskrit
! English
|-
|1.
|Sem-Chan (Animated Universe) SSa - earth, as an element
|[[Brahman|Brahm]]. The Universe<br> [[Prakṛti|Prakrit]] = [[Matter]]<br> Iyam = Earth
|Organised matter
|-
|2.
|Zhihna ([[Soul#Vital soul|Vital Soul]])
|[[Puruṣa|Purush]]
|Vivifying, Universal [[Spirit]]
|-
|3.
|Yor Wa (Illusion)
|([[Māyā|Maya]]) [[Ākāśa|Akasa]]
|Astral or Cosmic atmosphere
|-
|4.
|Od. (light, the shining ''active'' [[Astral Light]])
|[[Vāc|Vach]] (the Kamakasa)
|Cosmic Will
|-
|5.
|Nam Kha (Ether passive)
|Yajna (latent form in<br> [[Brahmā|Brahma]] = [[Puruṣa|Purush]] determined by activity of No. 4)
|Viradji (?)<br>Universal Illusion
|-
|6.
|Kon Chhog (Uncreated Principle)
|[[Nārāyaṇa|Narayan]] -- Spirit brooding over the waters and reflecting in itself the Universe
|[[Mahat|Universal Mind]]
|-
|7.
|Nyug ([[Duration]] in eternity or [[space]])
|[[Svayambhū#Svāyambhuva|Swayambuva]] in [?] (space)
|Latent [[Spirit]] [[Ain Soph|Ensoph]]
|}


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-9.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-9_thm.jpg]


{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*  
* After the table [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote:''"This may help to throw light on some Eastern metaphysical writings, but it seems to me an effort to put into words some correspondences that are too subtle for such classification."''
* Below is the corrected Tibetan spelling of some terms by [[David Reigle]].<ref>David Reigle, ''Blavatsky's Secret Books'' (San Diego, CA: Wizards Bookshelf, 1999), 64</ref>
:- '''Sem-Chan''': ''sems-can'' (a sentient being, Skt. sattva)
:- '''SSa''': ''sa'' (earth, Skt. pṛthivī, [[bhūmi]])
:- '''Od''': <nowiki>'</nowiki>''od'' (light, Skt. prabhā, āloka)
:- '''Nam Kha''': ''nam-mkha<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' (space, ether, Skt. ākāśa)
:- '''Kon Chhog''': ''dkon-mchog'' (jewel, Skt. ratna)
:- '''Nyug''': ''snyugs'' ("duration," "continuity," "time")


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}
Line 277: Line 354:
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
''(13) Sem chan, animated universe: S.Sa, earth as an element. Where then does cosmic or unorganised matter class?''
[13] Sem chan, animated universe: S.Sa, earth as an element. Where then does cosmic or unorganised matter class?


'''Zhi gyu ([[Cosmic Matter|cosmic matter]]), Thog ([[space]]), Nyng ([[duration]]), Khor wa ([[motion]]), all one.'''
'''Zhi gyu ([[Cosmic Matter|cosmic matter]]), Thog ([[space]]), Nyng ([[duration]]), Khor wa ([[motion]]), all one.'''


'''[[Fire (symbol)|Fire]], as everything else, has seven [[principle]]s. [[Odyle|Od]], one, but not the most material --- sixth.'''
'''[[Fire (symbol)|Fire]], as everything else, has seven [[principle]]s. Od, one, but not the most material -- sixth.'''


''(14) All [[Cosmic Matter|matter cosmic]] or organised has inherent [[motion]]. What then does Zhihna, vital soul or vivifying principle, do to it?''
 
[14] All [[Cosmic Matter|matter cosmic]] or organised has inherent [[motion]]. What then does Zhihna, [[Soul#Vital soul|vital soul]] or vivifying principle, do to it?


'''There you see. As well ask what [[Prāṇa|vital principle]] does for human body when it'''
'''There you see. As well ask what [[Prāṇa|vital principle]] does for human body when it'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-10.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-10_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Nyng''' (''snyugs'') is a Tibetan word for "duration", "continuity", or "time."
* '''Khor wa''' (''<nowiki>'</nowiki>khor-ba'') means "cycle", "revolving," in Tibetan.
{{Col-end}}
== Page 11 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''comes into it in conjunction with the other five. A dead body is composed of molecules full of life, is it? Yet when [[Soul#Vital soul|vital soul]] has deserted the whole, what is it but a dead body. Give up your pansophy and come down to our [[Dzyu|Dgyu]]. We believe in spontaneous generation and you do not. We say that [[Soul#Vital soul|Zhima]] being positive, and [[Cosmic Matter|Zhi-gyu]] [gyu (material) Earth in this sense] negative, it is only when the two come in contact as the former is brought to act upon the latter, that organised, living, self-acting [[matter]] is produced. Everything invisible, imponderable'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-11.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-10_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Pansophy'''. In monotheistic belief systems it refers to God as being the ultimate knowing spirit.
* '''Zhima''' was spelled "Zhihna" on the table.
{{Col-end}}
== Page 12 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''(the [[spirit]] of a thing) is positive, for it belongs to the world of reality; as everything solid, visible, is negative. Primate and ultimate, positive and negative. So much in our manifested world. As the [[force]]s move on and the distance between organised and unorganised [[matter]] becomes greater, a tendency towards the reverse begins to take place. The powers of attraction and repulsion become gradually weaker. Then a complete exchange of properties takes place, and for a time equilibrium is restored in an opposite order. At every grade further'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-12.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-10_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 298: Line 404:
{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 11 ==
== Page 13 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
'''onward, or away toward their primary chaotic state, shifts no more mutually its property, but weakens gradually until it reaches the [[Be-ness|world of non-being]], where exists the eternal mechanical [[motion]], the uncreated cause from whence proceeds in a kind of incessant downward and upward rotation, the founts of being from non-being, the latter, the reality, the former [[Māyā|maya]], the temporary from the everlasting, the effect from its cause, the effect becoming in'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-13.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-13_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
*
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 14 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
'''its turn cause ad infinitum. During the [[pralaya]], that upward and downward [[motion]] ceases, inherent unconscious life alone remaining--all creative forces paralysed, and everything resting in the night of [[Manas|mind]].'''
 
 
[15] Are we to consider any of the [[principle]]s as non-molecular?
 
'''There comes a time when polarity ceases to exist or act, as everything else. In the night of mind, all is equilibrised in the boundless cosmos in a state of non-action or [[Be-ness#Non-being|non-being]].'''
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-14.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-14_thm.jpg]
 
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
*
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 15 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
[16] And is cosmic matter non-molecular?
 
'''[[Cosmic matter]] can no more be non-molecular than organised [[matter]].--[[Seventh Principle|7th principle]] is molecular as well as the first one, but the former differentiates from the latter, not only by its molecules getting wider apart and becoming more attenuated, but also by losing its polarity. Try to understand and realise this idea and the rest will become easy.'''
 
'''The panspermic and theospermic conceptions will both be in our way as taught by your schools.'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-15.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-15_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* '''The panspermic theory''' was proposed in the nineteenth century by the scientists Jöns Jacob Berzelius, Lord Kelvin (William Thomson), and Hermann von Helmholtz. It postulates that life came to Earth by means of meteoroids, asteroids, and comets.
* '''Theospermia''' may refer to creationism.
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 16 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''comes into it in conjunction with the other five. A dead body is composed of molecules full of life, is it? Yet when [[Prāṇa|vital soul]] has deserted the whole, what is it but a dead body. Give up your pansophy and come down to our [[Dzyu|Dgyu]]. We believe in spontaneous generation and you do not. We say that Zhima being positive, and Zhi-gyu [gyu (material) earth in this sense] negative, it is only when the two come in contact as the former is brought to act upon the latter, that organised, living, self-acting matter is produced. Everything invisible, imponderable'''
'''You will never be able to realise the latter as an absurdity, so long as you comprehend but imperfectly the incessant work of what is called by [[Science#Occult_Science|Occult Science]] the [[Logos|Central Point]] in both its active and passive states. As I said, we believe in spontaneous generation, in the independent origin of [[matter]] whether living or dead, and we prove it, which is more than your Pasteurs and Wymans and Huxleys can say. Did they but know that [[Soul#Vital soul|Zhima]] cannot be shut out or pumped out from a'''
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-16.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/cn-16_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Spontaneous generation'''. Aristotle thought that simple living things came forth spontaneously from the ''pneuma'', or "vital heat" present in nonliving things.
* '''Louis Pasteur'''. His experiment is generally known to have refuted the theory of spontaneous generation in 1859.
* '''Zhima''' was spelled "Zhihna" on the table.
{{Col-end}}
== Page 17 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''glass vessel like air, and that hence, wherever there is [[Puruṣa|purush]] there can be no thermal limit of organic life, they would have bak=baked less and told the world less absurdities than they have. In short, [[motion]], [[cosmic matter]], [[duration]], [[space]], are everywhere and for perspicuity's sake, let us place or fancy this multiplicity in or at the top of a [[Circle (symbol)|circle]], ("boundless"). They are passive, negative, unconscious, yet ever propelled by their inherent latent [[life]] or [[force]]. During the [[Manvantara|day of activity]], that [[Law of Cycles|cyclic]]'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-17.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-17_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Bak-bak''' is a Hindi expression for "yakking" or "jabbering." [[A. P. Sinnett]] added a note saying: ''"Hindustani for 'purposeless chatter'."''
{{Col-end}}
== Page 18 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''[[force]] ejecting from the causative latent principle [[cosmic matter]], like the wheel of a water mill ejects showers of water -- dust around its rotating circle, put it in contact with the same principles, but whose condition owing to their finding themselves outside the state of primitive passivity of the eternal immutability has already changed. Thus the same principles begin to acquire so to speak the germs of polarity. Then coming within the [[Mahat|Universal mind]] Dyan Kam develops these germs, conceives, and giving the impulse'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-18.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-18_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 314: Line 509:
{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 12 ==
== Page 19 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''(the spirit of a thing) is positive, for it belongs to the world of reality; as everything solid, visible, is negative. Primate and ultimate, positive and negative. So much in our manifested world. As the forces move on and the distance between organised and unorganised matter becomes greater, a tendency towards the reverse begins to take place. The powers of attraction and repulsion become gradually weaker. Then a complete exchange of properties takes place, and for a time equilibrium is restored in an opposite order. At every grade further'''
 
'''communicates it to [[Fohat]], who, vibrating along [[Ākāśa|Akasa]], Od (a state of [[cosmic matter]], [[motion]], [[force]], etc.) runs along the lines of cosmic manifestations and frames all and everything; blindly -- agreed, yet as faithfully in accordance with the prototypes as conceived in the [[Mahat|eternal mind]] as a good mirror reflects your face.'''
 
 
---------------------------
 
 
[17] On the Hypothetical Absolute and Infinite Final Cause.
 
'''The [[absolute]] and infinite is composed of the conditioned and finite. Causes are conditioned in their modes'''
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-19.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-19_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* Before beginning question 17, [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote: ''"The following notes down to the end of the page are much abbreviated so far as the original essay or memorandum of [[A. O. Hume|Hume]] is concerned, [[Morya|M]]'s notes are just made intelligible by a few lines of the original essay. I am not now abbreviating anything, but am giving you all I thought it necessary to preserve at the time."'' Hume's "original essay or memorandum" may refer to a preliminary chapter on God that he was preparing.
 
{{Col-end}}


== Page 20 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''of existence and attributes, and as individual aggregates -- unconditioned and [[Eternity|eternal]] in their sum or as a collective aggregation.'''
[18] If the [[Absolute]] is a blind law, how can it give birth to intelligence?
'''But passive latent intelligence, or that principle diffused throughout the universe which in its pure immateriality is non-intelligence and non-consciousness, and which as soon as it becomes imprisoned in matter is transformed into both -- can.'''
[19] The [[Absolute]] if intelligent, must be omnipotent, omniscient, and all-good?
'''Please give your reasons why?'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-20.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-20_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
*
{{Col-end}}
== Page 21 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
In the East the [[Absolute]], itself non-conscious, is linked to intelligence by [[emanation]]s, supposed to be conditioned. "How far this hypothesis satisfies the mind as to the possibility of intelligence evolving out of non-intelligence," depends on the mind addressed. . . .
'''What do you know of the gradual development of brain ever since the Silurian period?'''
[20] The Origin of [[Evil]] difficulty, dealt with by means of the sugar refinery simile.
'''And the more the sugar refined the greater the fermentation produced in the stomach and the more worms.'''
It is useless . . .
'''Show me the philosopher'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-21.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-21_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
'''NOTES:'''
* '''The Silurian Period''' (443.7 to 416.0 million years ago) was a time when the Earth underwent a relative stabilization of its general climate, which led to significant biological events.
{{Col-end}}
== Page 22 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''who would prove it useless!'''
. . . to say that [[evil]] is as necessary to make good apparent as darkness is to make light cognisable. To the conditioned it may be -- to [[God|the omnipotent]] nothing is necessary.
'''Prove him first.'''
But clearly a conditioned agency is not the final cause. Above it is the law or principle that conditions it. . . .
'''How is this? Where? Not unless you create something outside the [[absolute]] and limitless.'''
Problems lying behind the veil that separates the non-manifested final cause from the manifested universe are beyond the grasp of minds conditioned in that universe.
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-22.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-22_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 330: Line 610:
{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 13 ==
== Page 23 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
'''Indeed they are not!'''
 
. . . The [[absolute]] infinite is unthinkable and we can neither comprehend it nor justify its ways to man.
 
'''Then why lose time over it? Who commissioned you to do so?'''
 
'''Your all-pervading supreme power exists, but it is exactly [[matter]], whose life is [[motion]], [[will]], and nerve power, [[electricity]]. [[Puruṣa|Purush]] can think but through [[Prakṛti|Prakriti]].'''
 
 
---------------------------
 
 
[21] What you would say would be: --
 
"Whether this be so or not (as regards the hypothesis of an [[Absolute]] beyond the conditioned) it is and must ever
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-23.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-23_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* Before question 21, [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote: ''"Following this I have an essay by [[A. O. Hume|Hume]] summing up the previous conclusions, as follows."''
 
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 24 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}


'''onward, or away toward their primary chaotic state, shifts no more mutually its property, but weakens gradually until it reaches the world of non-being, where exists the eternal mechanical motion, the uncreated cause from whence proceeds in a kind of incessant downward and upward rotation, the founts of being from non-being, the latter, the reality, the former maya, the temporary from the everlasting, the effect from its cause, the effect becoming in'''
remain a pure hypothesis. The highest intelligences <u>in</u> the universe know nothing of it--so far as they can explore, the manifested universe is boundless and infinite. [[Esoteric Philosophy|Our philosophy]] admits only of what is known--and knowable. This is admittedly unknowable even to [[Planetary Spirit|Planetaries]], and it is ''ex hypothesi'' non-existent--why then consider it. . . .
 
"Even were this conception correct, how does it concern us? For thousands of years the highest planetaries have explored the universe; they have found no limits to it, and nothing in it guided or governed by any external impulse, everything on the contrary proceeding from internal impulses which they understand and which suffice to explain everything they
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-24.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-24_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''ex hypothesi''' - something adopted according to the hypothesis (Latin)
{{Col-end}}
== Page 25 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
have ever had cognisance of. <u>A quoi bon</u> then to introduce this unnecessary conception of a something (which as non-existent for us is a nothing) outside and beyond what for us is limitless and eternal, when whether it exists or not it plays no discoverable part in anything that concerns us.
"The fact is your western philosophical conceptions are monarchical; ours democratic. You are only able to think of the universe as governed by a king, while we know it to be a republic in which the aggregate indwelling intelligence rules."
'''We might say more -- never better. That is just what we would say.'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-25.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-25_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
* '''À quoi bon?''' is a French phrase meaning "what's the use?"


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 14 ==
== Page 26 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}


'''its turn cause ad infinitum. During the pralaya, that upward and downward motion ceases, inherent unconscious life alone remaining --- all creative forces paralysed, and everything resting in the night of mind.'''
[22] Who are the artificers of the world?
 
'''[[Dhyāni-Chohan|Dyan Chohans]] -- [[Planetary Spirit|Planetaries]].'''
 
 
----------------------------


(15) Are we to consider any of the principles as non-molecular?


There comes a time when polarity ceases to exist or act, as everything else. In the night of mind, all is equilibrised in the boundless cosmos in a state of non-action or non-being.
Pinned to next essay.
 
'''Gyu-thog -- [[Phenomena]]l or Material Universe (secret name) Aja-sakti. Viswam Zigten-jas -- cosmogony, from Zigten = living world, and jas -- to make. Chh=rab--genesis.'''
 
 
(23) The universe may primarily be conceived as [[space]] pervaded by an infinite and [[Eternity|eternal]] and homogeneous congery of molecules, in which [[motion]], their latent unconscious [[life]], is inherent. (In this its passive unmanifested state it may be regarded as [[chaos]]?)
 
'''Yes; if only people were'''


{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-26.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-26-thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* After question 22, [[A. P. Sinnett]] wrote: ''"Essay by [[A. O. Hume|Hume]], with Notes as before from M."''
* '''Aja-sakti''' from the [[Sanskrit]] ''aja'' "unborn" and ''śakti'' "power."
* '''Viswam''' from the [[Sanskrit]] ''viśvam'' "the all," "the universe," "the world."
* '''Zigten-jas''' (Jigten-jas) from Tibetan ''<nowiki>'</nowiki>jig-rten'' "universe," "world," and ''byas'' "to make," "to create."
* '''Chh-rab''' (''chags-rab'') means "genesis" in Tibetan.
{{Col-end}}


== Page 27 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''capable of conceiving what real [[chaos]] is, which they are not.'''
Though truly an [[unity]] it may be conceived in its various aspects as (Thog) [[space]], in regard to its boundless extension, co-existing with (Nyng) [[eternity]], in regard to its endless [[duration]], (Zhi-gyu) [[cosmic matter]] in regard to its molecules, and Khorwa -- [[Fohat|cosmic force]] in regard to its all pervading [[motion]].
But these four conceptions must be held to indicate not four elements composing a compound, but rather four properties or attributes of one single thing, just as on earth one thing may be hot, luminous, heavy, and in motion. This universe one and indivisible in its passive [[Pralaya|unmanifested]] form, this
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-27.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-27_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
*
{{Col-end}}
== Page 28 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
[[chaos]] is for us non-existent. . .
'''For you, but why speak for others?'''
. . . but throughout it are scattered centres of activity or [[evolution]], and wherever and whenever activity prevails, there portions of the whole differentiate, and where this occurs, homogeneity ceases. Thus [[Matter#Differentiation_of_matter|differentiation]] is due
(1) To the greater or less proximity of the molecules.
(2) To their greater or less attenuation.
'''(What does (2) mean? How can the primal molecules grow thinner or fatter -- <u>ex-nihilo</u>, etc.?)'''
'''I was not aware that atoms were considered by you as something <u>nihil</u>. Are not the molecules considered in science as compound [of] [[Life-Atom#Atoms|atoms]]?'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-28.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-28_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
'''NOTES:'''
* '''Ex-nihilo''' is a Latin phrase meaning "out of nothing". It often appears in conjunction with the concept of creation, as in "creation out of nothing."
{{Col-end}}
== Page 29 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''[[Science#Modern_Science|Your science]] knows only of such compound molecules, and a [[Life-Atom#Atoms|primal atom]] is and will remain for ever as a hypothetical abstraction for it. Science can know nothing of the nature of atoms outside the region of effects on [[Globe#Globe D|her globe]] and even that atom she calls indivisible, which we do not, for we know of the existence and properties of the universal solvent--the essence of the [[Elements#In_Hinduism|Panchamahabutam]]--the five elements. Even the existence of the atoms which compose the unseen medium through'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-29.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-29_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
Line 368: Line 777:
{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 15 ==
== Page 30 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
'''which the power which magnetises instantly a short iron rod placed across the centre of a hoop two yards in diameter around which a wire thickly covered with india rubber is coiled, &ndash; even the existence of such [[Life-Atom#Atoms|atoms]] I say, remains an open question and [[Science#Modern_Science|science]] remains puzzled and embarrassed to decide whether it is an action at a distance without or with some mysterious medium &ndash; or what?'''
 
(3) To changes in their polarity.
 
This [[Matter#Differentiation_of_matter|differentiation]] in activity is manifestation, and everything so differentiated comes into existence or becomes conceivable for us. Each
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-30.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-30_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* '''Action at a distance without'''. In several editions of the Cosmological Notes the word "distance" is erroneously transcribed as "distant." Also, notice than in Sinnett's transcript there is no comma after "without" as it appears in printed editions.
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 31 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}


(16) And is cosmic matter non-molecular?
centre of activity (and these centres are countless) marks a solar system, but these are still rari nantes in gurgite vasto, hanging in the all-pervading ocean of the unmanifested universe, out of which new manifestations are perpetually evolving, and into the oblivion of which others whose cycle has been completed are ever returning.


Cosmic matter can no more be non-molecular than organised matter. -- 7th principle is molecular as well as the first one, but the former differentiates from the latter, not only by its molecules getting wider apart and becoming more attenuated, but also by losing its polarity. Try to understand and realise this idea and the rest will become easy.
Alternations of [[Manvantara|activity]] and [[Pralaya|passivity]] constitute the [[Law of Cycles|cyclic law]] of the universe. As the [[Macrocosm and Microcosm|microcosm]] man has his days and nights, his waking and his sleeping hours, so has the earth, which, a macrocosm to him is a microcosm to the solar system, and so has this latter, which, a macrocosm to a single [[globe]], is itself a microcosm to the universe.  


The panspermic and theospermic conceptions will both be in our way as taught by your schools.
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-31.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-31_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* '''Rari nantes in gurgite vasto''' is a Latin phrase found in the Virgil's ''Aeneid'' (I, 118) meaning "rare survivors in the vast abyss."
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 32 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
That the universe itself must similarly have its days and nights of activity and passivity, is probable by analogy, but if so these cover periods unthinkable, and the fact remains unknowable by the highest intelligences conditioned in the universe.
 
Is this correct? If not when the entire universe goes into [[pralaya]] (what is your Tibetan word?) how can anyone know anything about it?
 
'''Maha bar do -- the period between [[death]] and regeneration of man is so called -- also Chhe bar do.'''


'''They can know for this is but <u>our scan</u>, or as you say by [[Law of Correspondences|analogy]].'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-32.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-32_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Chhe bar do''' (''che bar-do''). The Tibetan word ''che'' (Skt. ''mahā'') means "big," "great," "huge," and ''bar-do'' "intermediate state," "interval."
{{Col-end}}
== Page 33 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
The night of the solar system, the [[pralaya]] of the [[Hinduism|Hindus]], the Maha bar do or great night of mind of the Tibetans, involves the disintegration of all form and the return of that portion of the universe occupied by that system, to its [[Laya_Centre#Laya_state|passive unmanifested condition]], [[space]] pervaded by [[Life-Atom#Atoms|atoms]] in [[motion]]. Everything else passes away for the time, but [[matter]] which these ultimate atoms represent (though at times objective, at times potential or subjective, now organised, now unorganised) is eternal and indestructible, and motion is the imperishable [[life]] (conscious or unconscious as the case may be) of matter. Even therefore during the night of mind, when all other [[force]]s are paralysed, when Chyang -- omniscience, and Chyang mi shi kon -- ignorance, both sleep, and
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-33.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-33_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
* '''Maha bar do'''. See note on previous page.
* '''Chang (Chi-ang)''' (tib.) knowing anything, omniscient.
* '''Chang-mi-she(s)-khan''' (tib.) ignorant, stupid.


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 16 ==
== Page 34 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
You will never be able to realise the latter as an absurdity, so long as you comprehend but imperfectly the incessant work of what is called by Occult Science the Central Point in both its active and passive states. As I said, we believe in spontaneous generation, in the independent origin of matter whether living or dead, and we prove it, which is more than your Pasteurs and Wymans and Huxleys can say. Did they but know that Zhima cannot be shut out or pumped out from a
 
everything else rests, this latent unconscious life unceasingly maintains the molecules in which it is inherent in blind resultless and purposeless [[motion]] inter se.
 
'''Why should it be more purposeless and resultless than the unconscious blind motion of the atoms in any foetus preparing for rebirth?'''
 
The solar system has disappeared even to the highest intelligences in other solar systems.
 
Is this correct? Can the [[Planetary Spirit|planetaries]] in any way cognise the passive [[Be-ness#Non-being|non-being]] portions of the universe?
 
'''They can.'''
 
[[Adept]]s can at will I know create forms out of [[cosmic matter]], but probably this cosmic matter is many degrees from matter as it
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-34.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-34_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
 
'''NOTES:'''
* '''Inter se''' is Latin for "among themselves."
 
{{Col-end}}
 
== Page 35 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
 
exists in the passive latent universe, which perhaps should rather be called potential rather than cosmic matter.
 
'''Potentiality is a possibility not an actuality. Find a better word.'''


But nothing has been annihilated any more than anything has been ever created; only, this recently active, organised, manifested and existing portion of the universe losing all differentiation of its parts, has passed into its [[Laya_Centre#Laya_state|primordial passive homogeneous unmanifested]], and quoad all intelligences, non-existent or inconceivable state. It has resettled into [[chaos]].
If it is asked whence these [[Law of Cycles|alterations of activity and passivity]] the reply is that they are the law inherent in the universe.
(Here as a footnote would come the
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-35.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-35_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Quoad''', from the Latin, meaning "regarding, with respect to."
{{Col-end}}
== Page 36 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
(purport of the argument approved by you against the unnecessary creation of an [[God|intelligence outside]] the self-governed universe.)
'''If you can show me one being or object in the universe which does not originate and develop through, and in accordance with blind law, then only will your argument hold good and footnote be necessary. The doctrine of [[evolution]] is an eternal protest. Evolution means unfolding of the evolute from the involute, a process of gradual growth. The only thing that could have possibly been spontaneously created is [[cosmic matter]], and'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-36.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-36_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
*  


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 17 ==
== Page 37 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}


glass vessel like air, and that hence, wherever there is purush there can be no thermal limit of organic life, they would have bak-baked less and told the world less absurdities than they have. In short, motion, cosmic matter, duration, space, are everywhere and for perspicuity's sake, let us place or fancy this multiplicity in or at the top of a circle, ("boundless"). They are passive, negative, unconscious, yet ever propelled by their inherent latent life or force. During the day of activity, that cyclic
'''primordium with us means not only primogenitureship but [[Eternity|eternalism]], for [[matter]] is eternal and one of the Hlün dhüb not a Kyen -- a cause, itself the result of some primary cause. Were it so, at the end of every [[Pralaya#Maha-pralaya|Maha pralaya]] when the whole cosmos moves into [[Pariniṣpanna|collective perfection]] and every [[Life-Atom#Atoms|atom]] (that you call primordial, and we eternal) emanates from itself a still finer atom -- every individual atom containing in itself the actual potentiality of evoluting milliards of worlds each more perfect'''
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-37.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-37_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Hlün dhüb''' (''lhun-grub'') is a Tibetan word for "self-existing," "spontaneous," "without effort."
* '''Kyen''' (''rkyen'') is Tibetan for "cause" or "condition."
{{Col-end}}
== Page 38 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''and more ethereal, -- how is it that there is no sign of such an intelligence outside the self-governed universe? You take a last hypothesis -- a portion of your [[god]] sits in every [[Life-Atom#Atoms|atom]]. He is divided ad infinitum, he remains concealed in abscondito and the logical conclusion we arrive at is, that as the Infinite mind of the [[Dhyāni-Chohan|Dyan Chohans]] knows that the newly emanated atoms are incapable of any conscious or unconscious action, unless they receive the intellectual impulse <u>from them</u>, Ergo your'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-38.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-38_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
*  


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 18 ==
== Page 39 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
force ejecting from the causative latent principle cosmic matter, like the wheel of a water mill ejects showers of water --- dust around its rotating circle, put it in contact with the same principles, but whose condition owing to their finding themselves outside the state of primitive passivity of the eternal immutability has already changed. Thus the same principles begin to acquire so to speak the germs of polarity. Then coming within the Universal mind Dyan Kam develops these germs, conceives, and giving the impulse
 
'''[[god]] is no better than blind [[matter]] ever propelled by as blind eternal force or law, which is that matter's god -- Perchance. Well, well we shall not lose time over such talk.'''
 
The [[Pralaya|period of passivity]] ends, the night of mind ceases, the solar system awakes and re-emerges into [[Manvantara|manifestation]] and existence, and everything throughout it is once more as it was when the night set in. Though a period inconceivable to human minds has passed, it has passed but as a sound and dreamless sleep. The law of activity comes again into operation, the centre of [[evolution]] resumes its work, the fount of being commences to flow again.
 
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-39.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-39_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
*
{{Col-end}}
== Page 40 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
I conclude this must be so or otherwise the [[matter]] ejected from the vortex or Central point would find none in a differentiated state from which to acquire its own impulse of differentiation.
'''When the hour strikes the cosmic atoms already in a differentiated state remain statu quo, as well as [[globe]]s and everything else in the process of formation. Therefore you have seized the idea.'''
In the still passive portion of the Universe in which, and interpenetrated by which, hangs the remanifested solar system; in the [[Be-ness#Non-being|non-being]] where subsists the eternal mechanical [[motion]], its
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-40.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-40_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
*  


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 19 ==
== Page 41 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}


communicates it to Fohat, who, vibrating along Akasa, Od (a state of cosmic matter, motion, force, etc.) runs along the lines of cosmic manifestations and frames all and everything; blindly --- agreed, yet as faithfully in accordance with the prototypes as conceived in the eternal mind as a good mirror reflects your face.
uncreated cause, a vortex is formed which in its ceaseless rotation perpetually ejects into the polarised active manifested conscious Universe, the unpolarised passive unmanifested and unconscious Universal element.


(17) On the Hypothetical Absolute and Infinite Final Cause.
Call it [[motion]], [[cosmic matter]], [[duration]] or [[space]], for it is all these and yet one, this the Universe manifested and unmanifested and there is nothing else in the Universe. But the moment it passes out of passivity (or [[Be-ness#Non-being|non-being]]) into activity (or being), it begins to change its state and [[Matter#Differentiation_of_matter|differentiate]], from contact with what had formerly changed, and so the eternal wheel rolls on, the effect of to-day becoming the cause of tomorrow for ever and ever. But it must ever be remembered that the non-being -- the passive, is the [[Eternity|eternal]],


The absolute and infinite is composed of the conditioned and finite. Causes are conditioned in their modes
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-41.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-41_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
*
{{Col-end}}
== Page 42 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
the real; the being -- the active, the transitory and the [[Māyā|unreal]]. For longer or shorter as its career may be according to the impulses it receives, sooner or later the manifested disintegrates into the unmanifested, and being fades into [[Be-ness#Non-being|non-being]].
But how about the highest [[Planetary Spirit|Planetaries]]? They surely do not return into non-being, but pass on to higher or at any rate different solar systems.
'''The highest state of [[Nirvāṇa|Nirvana]] is the highest state of non-being. There comes a time when the whole infinitude sleeps or [[Pralaya|rests]], when All is reimmersed in the one eternal and uncreated sum of all.'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-42.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-42_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
* Before beginning question 17, [[A.P. Sinnett]] wrote: "The following notes down to the end of the page are much abbreviated. So far as the original essay or memorandum of [[A. O. Hume|Hume]] is concerned, [[Morya|M]]'s notes are just made intelligible by a few lines of the original essay. I am not now abbreviating anything, but am giving you all I thought it necessary to preserve at the time."
*  


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 20 ==
== Page 43 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
of existence and attributes, and as individual aggregates -- unconditioned and eternal in their sum or as a collective aggregation.


(18) If the Absolute is a blind law, how can it give birth to intelligence?
'''The sum of the latent unconscious potentiality.'''


But passive latent intelligence, or that principle diffused throughout the universe which in its pure immateriality is non-intelligence and non-consciousness, and which as soon as it becomes imprisoned in matter is transformed into both -- can.
It has been stated that a [[Matter#Differentiation_of_matter|differentiation]] of the [[Elements#The_One_Element|primordial element]] is the basis of the manifested Universe, and we must now consider the [[Septenary Principle|seven different principles]] that constitute and govern that Universe or in other words the seven different states or conditions in which this element exists in it.


(19) The Absolute if intelligent, must be omnipotent, omniscient, and all-good?
'''There is no finite or primordial design but in conjunction with organised [[matter]]. Design is Kyen, a cause arising from a primary one. The latent design exists from the [[eternity]] in the one unborn eternal'''


Please give your reasons why?
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/ http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/]
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-43.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-42_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
* '''Kyen''' (''rkyen'') is Tibetan for "cause" or "condition."
{{Col-end}}
== Page 44 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
'''atom or the [[Logos#First_Logos|central point]] which is everywhere and nowhere, called -- (our most secret incommunicable name given at the [[initiation]] to the highest [[adept]]s). So I can give you the six names of the principles of our solar system, but have to withhold the rest and even the name of the seventh. Call it the unknown and explain why. A Dam-ze (Brahman) will not give you the name of even the crown of the [[Ākāśa|Akasa]], but will'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-44.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-44_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
{{Col-break|width=30%}}


'''NOTES:'''
'''NOTES:'''
*
*  


{{Col-end}}
{{Col-end}}


== Page 21 ==
== Page 45 ==
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-begin|width=98%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}
{{Col-break|width=55%}}


'''speak of the six primary [[force]]s in nature represented by the [[Astral Light|Astral light]]. I'll give you the principles by and bye. Study this well first.'''
{{Col-break|width=3%}}
{{Col-break|width=15%}}
[http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-45.jpg http://www.theosophy.wiki/mywiki/images/ML/CN-45_thm.jpg]
{{Col-break|width=30%}}
'''NOTES:'''
*
{{Col-end}}


==Online resources==
==Online resources==
===Articles===
===Articles===
*[http://blavatskyarchives.com/CosmologicalNotes.htm/ Cosmological Notes from A. P. Sinnett's MS. Book] by Blavatsky Study Center.
*[http://prajnaquest.fr/blog/category/cosmological-notes-manuscript/ The Orthography of Dgyu or Dzyu] by Ingmar de Boer
*[http://prajnaquest.fr/blog/category/cosmological-notes-manuscript/ The Orthography of Dgyu or Dzyu] by Ingmar de Boer


Line 493: Line 1,094:


[[Category:Research tools]]
[[Category:Research tools]]
[[Category:ML from Morya]]
[[Category:ML to A. O. Hume]]
[[es: Notas Cosmológicas]]

Latest revision as of 23:28, 18 June 2024

Quick Facts
People involved
Written by: Morya
Received by: A. O. Hume
Sent via: H. P. Blavatsky
Dates
Written on: unknown
Received on: Probably October 1881
Other dates: none
Places
Sent from: unknown
Received at: Simla
Via: none

The Cosmological Notes were published as LBS-Appendix II in the chronological edition of The Mahatma Letters. They were produced before Mahatma Letter No. 29. See below.

History

The Cosmological notes were given by Master M. in answer to questions put by A. O. Hume and A. P. Sinnett. It seems the notes were produced by means of a number of literary exchanges with the Master and conversations held with H. P. Blavatsky, who was a guest of the Humes at the time. As Sinnett recalls:

We appointed times each day for these efforts and I still have the M.S. book in which I recorded the results, of a very unsatisfactory character. Some extracts from the volume will show the way we struggled with our difficulties. My notes as they stand are put in the form of question and answer, the questions being rather the outcome of previous conversation than deliberately formulated by ourselves.​[1]

The Cosmological material started in late Sept. 1881 (probably after Master K.H. went into his retreat) and took place from two or three weeks, ending around October 18, when Sinnett left to return to Allahabad.

In the chronology of Mahatma Letters, one could tentatively place these notes before letter No. 29. However, since letter No. 44 is a second set of cosmological teachings, these Notes could be read right before letter 44.

The text

A. O. Hume retained the original of the Cosmological Notes, which is not extant. The copy preserved is the one A. P. Sinnett made for himself. In a letter to Fritz Kunz, Boris de Zirkoff described this copy as follows:

The originals of some of the Letters from the Masters, as transcribed in the published volume of Mahatma Letters, were not among the material bequeathed by Sinnett to Miss Maud Hoffman. They exist only as copies made by Sinnett in a separate leather-bound notebook. This notebook has been filmed also, when microfilm was prepared of the entire material. It is in this notebook that the "Cosmological Notes" are to be found; they are therefore in Sinnett's handwriting. There are 24 pages of this material.[2]

We reproduce below the text of the Cosmological Notes as well as scanned images of Sinnett's MS notebook from Boris de Zirkoff's microfilm. The answers received from Master M. are in bold type. In addition, we are adding some notes that Sinnett attached to a copy of this manuscript that he sent to Francesca Arundale.[3] In these copy, he wrote the following introduction:

Notes from the Book of Kiu-te, the great repository of occult lore in the keeping of the Adepts in Tibet. I believe there are thirty or forty volumes, a great deal shown only to Initiates. What follows is merely some elementary catechism in the very beginning. We began to get these notes through Madame Blavatsky when Mr. Hume and I first set to work together. But we soon got off on to other lines of rail.
The very first thing I ever had in the way of philosophical teaching I sent you a copy of last year; it was sketch of the chain of worlds which I suppose you have somewhere still. Then we got in a fragmentary way the materials on which Hume wrote the first of the "Occult Fragments"--that relating to the seven principles in man. It is necessary to have an absolute comprehension of that division at starting. It runs through all nature in various shapes and ways. I now copy out of my MS. book.--A. P. Sinnett.[4]

Additional comments by him will be provided below in the column for "Notes".

Page 1

[1] What are the different kinds of knowledge?

The real (Dgyu) and the unreal (Dgyu-mi). Dgyu becomes Fohat when in its activity — active agent of willelectricity — no other name.


[2] What is the difference between the two kinds of knowledge?

Real knowledge deals with eternal verities and primal causes. The unreal only with illusory effects.

Dgyu stands independent of the belief or unbelief of man. Dgyu-mi requires faith — rests on authority.


[3] Who possesses the real knowledge?

The Lhas or adept alone possesses the real, his mind being en rapport

cn-1_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 2

with the Universal Mind.

The Lhas has made the perfect junction of his soul with the Universal Mind in its fulness, which makes him for the time a divine being existing in the region of absolute intelligence, knowledge of natural laws or Dgyu. The profane cannot become a Dang-ma (purified soul), for he lacks means of perceiving Chhag, Genesis or the beginning of things.


[4] Is there any difference between what produces primal causes and their ultimate effects?

None. Everything in the occult universe, which embraces all the primal causes, is based upon two principles — Kosmic energy (Fohat or

cn-2_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Chhag (chags) "to cause".
  • After question 3, A. P. Sinnett wrote: "As I go on copying, I see I shall have to interpolate remarks of an explanatory nature now and then. . . . I wanted to remark that you must not be giving yourself excessive trouble to commit these Tibetan words to memory. We soon got out of the way of using them."

Page 3

breath of wisdom), and Kosmic ideation. Thyan Kam (= the knowledge of bringing about) giving the impulse to Kosmic energy in the right direction.

In Fohat all that exists on earth as ultimates exists as primates.


[5] What is the one eternal thing in the universe independent of every other thing?

Space.


[6] What things are co-existent with space?

(i) Duration.

(ii) Matter.

(iii) Motion, for this is the imperishable life (conscious or unconscious as the case may be) of matter, even during the pralaya, or night of mind.

cn-3_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 4

When Chyang or omniscience, and Chyang-mi-shi-khon — ignorance, both sleep, this latent unconscious life still maintains the matter it animates in sleepless unceasing motion.

(iv) The Akasa (Bar-nang) or Kosmic atmosphere, or Astral light or celestial ether, which whether in its latent or active condition surrounds and interpenetrates all matter in motion of which it is at once a result and the medium by which the Kosmic energy acts on its source.

(v) The Purush or 7th principle of the universe.

cn-4_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Bar-nang (bar-snang) is the Tibetan word for "sky," "heaven," or "atmosphere."

Page 5

Ling Sharir is composed of the ethereal elements of its (? Body's) organism, never leaves body but at death and remains near.


[7] Are we to understand Purush as another name for space, or as a different thing occupying every part of space?

Same. Swayambu occupies every part of space which itself is boundless and eternal, hence must be space in one sense. Swayambu becomes Purush when coming in contact with matter.


[8] The universal mind is the aggregate of all the minds of the Dyan Chohans or Planetaries, the result of the

cn-5_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • After the remark on the Ling Sharir, A. P. Sinnett adds: "This note, which is disconnected from the immediate subject of the paper was probably added by M. in reply to some current question asked at that time."

Page 6

action of Purush on matter, just as the spiritual soul in man is the action of spirit on matter?

Yes.


[9] Are we to look upon the seven principles as all matter and all spirit — one thing, with spirit as it were at one pole, and matter at the other?

Yes, just so.


[10]) If so, are we to view them as different states of matter or spirit, or how?

States, conditions, call it whatever you please. I call it Kyen — cause; itself a result of a previous or some primary cause.


[11] All matter consists of ultimate molecules. How may we conceive the different states of matter?

As the molecules go on

cn-6_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Kyen (rkyen) is a Tibetan word for "cause" or "condition."

Page 7

rarefying, so in proportion they become attenuated and the greater the distance between our globe and them — I do not mean here the region within the reach of your science — the greater the change in their polarity, the negative pole acquiring a stronger property of repulsion, and the positive losing gradually its power of attraction. (And now is the time for your men of Dgyu to set me down as a Thibetan ass, and for me to return the compliment.)

cn-7_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 8

[12] MAN

Thibetan Sanskrit English
1. A-ku Rupa Body
2. Zer (vital ray) Prana: Jivatma Life-principle
3. Chhu-lung (one of the 3 airs) Ling Sharir Astral Body
4. Nga-Zhi (essence of Action) Kama-Rupa Will-form
5. Ngë (Physical Ego) Linga Dha Bhut Animal Soul
6. Lana Sem-Nyed (Spiritual Soul) Atman Mayava-rupa Spiritual Soul
7. Hlün Dhüb (Self existing) Mahatma Spirit

cn-8_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • A. P. Sinnett wrote: "We were anxious to make out the correspondences between the seven principles of Man and of the Universe. M. wrote out the following table."
  • 3 airs. In printed editions this is wrongly transcribed as "3 aims." Sinnett's "r" often looks similar to his "n," but not to his "m."
  • Following is the corrected Tibetan spelling of some terms by David Reigle.[5]
- A-ku: sku (body, Skt. kāya)
- Chhu-lung: chhu [?], rlung (air, Skt. prāṇa).
- Nga Zhi: nga [the "I"], gzhi (basis)
- Lana Sem-Nyed: bla-na (above, higher, Skt. uttara), nyid (mind, heart, soul, Skt. citta), sems-nyid (Skt. cittam eva, "mind alone").
- Hlün Dhüb: lhun-grub (self-existing, without effort, Skt. anābhoga)

Page 9

[12] UNIVERSE

Thibetan Sanskrit English
1. Sem-Chan (Animated Universe) SSa - earth, as an element Brahm. The Universe
Prakrit = Matter
Iyam = Earth
Organised matter
2. Zhihna (Vital Soul) Purush Vivifying, Universal Spirit
3. Yor Wa (Illusion) (Maya) Akasa Astral or Cosmic atmosphere
4. Od. (light, the shining active Astral Light) Vach (the Kamakasa) Cosmic Will
5. Nam Kha (Ether passive) Yajna (latent form in
Brahma = Purush determined by activity of No. 4)
Viradji (?)
Universal Illusion
6. Kon Chhog (Uncreated Principle) Narayan -- Spirit brooding over the waters and reflecting in itself the Universe Universal Mind
7. Nyug (Duration in eternity or space) Swayambuva in [?] (space) Latent Spirit Ensoph

cn-9_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • After the table A. P. Sinnett wrote:"This may help to throw light on some Eastern metaphysical writings, but it seems to me an effort to put into words some correspondences that are too subtle for such classification."
  • Below is the corrected Tibetan spelling of some terms by David Reigle.[6]
- Sem-Chan: sems-can (a sentient being, Skt. sattva)
- SSa: sa (earth, Skt. pṛthivī, bhūmi)
- Od: 'od (light, Skt. prabhā, āloka)
- Nam Kha: nam-mkha' (space, ether, Skt. ākāśa)
- Kon Chhog: dkon-mchog (jewel, Skt. ratna)
- Nyug: snyugs ("duration," "continuity," "time")

Page 10

[13] Sem chan, animated universe: S.Sa, earth as an element. Where then does cosmic or unorganised matter class?

Zhi gyu (cosmic matter), Thog (space), Nyng (duration), Khor wa (motion), all one.

Fire, as everything else, has seven principles. Od, one, but not the most material -- sixth.


[14] All matter cosmic or organised has inherent motion. What then does Zhihna, vital soul or vivifying principle, do to it?

There you see. As well ask what vital principle does for human body when it

cn-10_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Nyng (snyugs) is a Tibetan word for "duration", "continuity", or "time."
  • Khor wa ('khor-ba) means "cycle", "revolving," in Tibetan.

Page 11

comes into it in conjunction with the other five. A dead body is composed of molecules full of life, is it? Yet when vital soul has deserted the whole, what is it but a dead body. Give up your pansophy and come down to our Dgyu. We believe in spontaneous generation and you do not. We say that Zhima being positive, and Zhi-gyu [gyu (material) Earth in this sense] negative, it is only when the two come in contact as the former is brought to act upon the latter, that organised, living, self-acting matter is produced. Everything invisible, imponderable

cn-10_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Pansophy. In monotheistic belief systems it refers to God as being the ultimate knowing spirit.
  • Zhima was spelled "Zhihna" on the table.

Page 12

(the spirit of a thing) is positive, for it belongs to the world of reality; as everything solid, visible, is negative. Primate and ultimate, positive and negative. So much in our manifested world. As the forces move on and the distance between organised and unorganised matter becomes greater, a tendency towards the reverse begins to take place. The powers of attraction and repulsion become gradually weaker. Then a complete exchange of properties takes place, and for a time equilibrium is restored in an opposite order. At every grade further

cn-10_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 13

onward, or away toward their primary chaotic state, shifts no more mutually its property, but weakens gradually until it reaches the world of non-being, where exists the eternal mechanical motion, the uncreated cause from whence proceeds in a kind of incessant downward and upward rotation, the founts of being from non-being, the latter, the reality, the former maya, the temporary from the everlasting, the effect from its cause, the effect becoming in

CN-13_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 14

its turn cause ad infinitum. During the pralaya, that upward and downward motion ceases, inherent unconscious life alone remaining--all creative forces paralysed, and everything resting in the night of mind.


[15] Are we to consider any of the principles as non-molecular?

There comes a time when polarity ceases to exist or act, as everything else. In the night of mind, all is equilibrised in the boundless cosmos in a state of non-action or non-being.

CN-14_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 15

[16] And is cosmic matter non-molecular?

Cosmic matter can no more be non-molecular than organised matter.--7th principle is molecular as well as the first one, but the former differentiates from the latter, not only by its molecules getting wider apart and becoming more attenuated, but also by losing its polarity. Try to understand and realise this idea and the rest will become easy.

The panspermic and theospermic conceptions will both be in our way as taught by your schools.

CN-15_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • The panspermic theory was proposed in the nineteenth century by the scientists Jöns Jacob Berzelius, Lord Kelvin (William Thomson), and Hermann von Helmholtz. It postulates that life came to Earth by means of meteoroids, asteroids, and comets.
  • Theospermia may refer to creationism.

Page 16

You will never be able to realise the latter as an absurdity, so long as you comprehend but imperfectly the incessant work of what is called by Occult Science the Central Point in both its active and passive states. As I said, we believe in spontaneous generation, in the independent origin of matter whether living or dead, and we prove it, which is more than your Pasteurs and Wymans and Huxleys can say. Did they but know that Zhima cannot be shut out or pumped out from a

cn-16_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Spontaneous generation. Aristotle thought that simple living things came forth spontaneously from the pneuma, or "vital heat" present in nonliving things.
  • Louis Pasteur. His experiment is generally known to have refuted the theory of spontaneous generation in 1859.
  • Zhima was spelled "Zhihna" on the table.

Page 17

glass vessel like air, and that hence, wherever there is purush there can be no thermal limit of organic life, they would have bak=baked less and told the world less absurdities than they have. In short, motion, cosmic matter, duration, space, are everywhere and for perspicuity's sake, let us place or fancy this multiplicity in or at the top of a circle, ("boundless"). They are passive, negative, unconscious, yet ever propelled by their inherent latent life or force. During the day of activity, that cyclic

CN-17_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Bak-bak is a Hindi expression for "yakking" or "jabbering." A. P. Sinnett added a note saying: "Hindustani for 'purposeless chatter'."

Page 18

force ejecting from the causative latent principle cosmic matter, like the wheel of a water mill ejects showers of water -- dust around its rotating circle, put it in contact with the same principles, but whose condition owing to their finding themselves outside the state of primitive passivity of the eternal immutability has already changed. Thus the same principles begin to acquire so to speak the germs of polarity. Then coming within the Universal mind Dyan Kam develops these germs, conceives, and giving the impulse

CN-18_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 19

communicates it to Fohat, who, vibrating along Akasa, Od (a state of cosmic matter, motion, force, etc.) runs along the lines of cosmic manifestations and frames all and everything; blindly -- agreed, yet as faithfully in accordance with the prototypes as conceived in the eternal mind as a good mirror reflects your face.




[17] On the Hypothetical Absolute and Infinite Final Cause.

The absolute and infinite is composed of the conditioned and finite. Causes are conditioned in their modes

CN-19_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Before beginning question 17, A. P. Sinnett wrote: "The following notes down to the end of the page are much abbreviated so far as the original essay or memorandum of Hume is concerned, M's notes are just made intelligible by a few lines of the original essay. I am not now abbreviating anything, but am giving you all I thought it necessary to preserve at the time." Hume's "original essay or memorandum" may refer to a preliminary chapter on God that he was preparing.

Page 20

of existence and attributes, and as individual aggregates -- unconditioned and eternal in their sum or as a collective aggregation.


[18] If the Absolute is a blind law, how can it give birth to intelligence?

But passive latent intelligence, or that principle diffused throughout the universe which in its pure immateriality is non-intelligence and non-consciousness, and which as soon as it becomes imprisoned in matter is transformed into both -- can.


[19] The Absolute if intelligent, must be omnipotent, omniscient, and all-good?

Please give your reasons why?

CN-20_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 21

In the East the Absolute, itself non-conscious, is linked to intelligence by emanations, supposed to be conditioned. "How far this hypothesis satisfies the mind as to the possibility of intelligence evolving out of non-intelligence," depends on the mind addressed. . . .

What do you know of the gradual development of brain ever since the Silurian period?


[20] The Origin of Evil difficulty, dealt with by means of the sugar refinery simile.

And the more the sugar refined the greater the fermentation produced in the stomach and the more worms.

It is useless . . .

Show me the philosopher

CN-21_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • The Silurian Period (443.7 to 416.0 million years ago) was a time when the Earth underwent a relative stabilization of its general climate, which led to significant biological events.

Page 22

who would prove it useless!

. . . to say that evil is as necessary to make good apparent as darkness is to make light cognisable. To the conditioned it may be -- to the omnipotent nothing is necessary.

Prove him first.

But clearly a conditioned agency is not the final cause. Above it is the law or principle that conditions it. . . .

How is this? Where? Not unless you create something outside the absolute and limitless.

Problems lying behind the veil that separates the non-manifested final cause from the manifested universe are beyond the grasp of minds conditioned in that universe.

CN-22_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 23

Indeed they are not!

. . . The absolute infinite is unthinkable and we can neither comprehend it nor justify its ways to man.

Then why lose time over it? Who commissioned you to do so?

Your all-pervading supreme power exists, but it is exactly matter, whose life is motion, will, and nerve power, electricity. Purush can think but through Prakriti.




[21] What you would say would be: --

"Whether this be so or not (as regards the hypothesis of an Absolute beyond the conditioned) it is and must ever

CN-23_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Before question 21, A. P. Sinnett wrote: "Following this I have an essay by Hume summing up the previous conclusions, as follows."


Page 24

remain a pure hypothesis. The highest intelligences in the universe know nothing of it--so far as they can explore, the manifested universe is boundless and infinite. Our philosophy admits only of what is known--and knowable. This is admittedly unknowable even to Planetaries, and it is ex hypothesi non-existent--why then consider it. . . .

"Even were this conception correct, how does it concern us? For thousands of years the highest planetaries have explored the universe; they have found no limits to it, and nothing in it guided or governed by any external impulse, everything on the contrary proceeding from internal impulses which they understand and which suffice to explain everything they

CN-24_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • ex hypothesi - something adopted according to the hypothesis (Latin)

Page 25

have ever had cognisance of. A quoi bon then to introduce this unnecessary conception of a something (which as non-existent for us is a nothing) outside and beyond what for us is limitless and eternal, when whether it exists or not it plays no discoverable part in anything that concerns us.

"The fact is your western philosophical conceptions are monarchical; ours democratic. You are only able to think of the universe as governed by a king, while we know it to be a republic in which the aggregate indwelling intelligence rules."

We might say more -- never better. That is just what we would say.

CN-25_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • À quoi bon? is a French phrase meaning "what's the use?"

Page 26

[22] Who are the artificers of the world?

Dyan Chohans -- Planetaries.




Pinned to next essay.

Gyu-thog -- Phenomenal or Material Universe (secret name) Aja-sakti. Viswam Zigten-jas -- cosmogony, from Zigten = living world, and jas -- to make. Chh=rab--genesis.


(23) The universe may primarily be conceived as space pervaded by an infinite and eternal and homogeneous congery of molecules, in which motion, their latent unconscious life, is inherent. (In this its passive unmanifested state it may be regarded as chaos?)

Yes; if only people were

CN-26-thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • After question 22, A. P. Sinnett wrote: "Essay by Hume, with Notes as before from M."
  • Aja-sakti from the Sanskrit aja "unborn" and śakti "power."
  • Viswam from the Sanskrit viśvam "the all," "the universe," "the world."
  • Zigten-jas (Jigten-jas) from Tibetan 'jig-rten "universe," "world," and byas "to make," "to create."
  • Chh-rab (chags-rab) means "genesis" in Tibetan.

Page 27

capable of conceiving what real chaos is, which they are not.

Though truly an unity it may be conceived in its various aspects as (Thog) space, in regard to its boundless extension, co-existing with (Nyng) eternity, in regard to its endless duration, (Zhi-gyu) cosmic matter in regard to its molecules, and Khorwa -- cosmic force in regard to its all pervading motion.

But these four conceptions must be held to indicate not four elements composing a compound, but rather four properties or attributes of one single thing, just as on earth one thing may be hot, luminous, heavy, and in motion. This universe one and indivisible in its passive unmanifested form, this

CN-27_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 28

chaos is for us non-existent. . .

For you, but why speak for others?

. . . but throughout it are scattered centres of activity or evolution, and wherever and whenever activity prevails, there portions of the whole differentiate, and where this occurs, homogeneity ceases. Thus differentiation is due

(1) To the greater or less proximity of the molecules.

(2) To their greater or less attenuation.

(What does (2) mean? How can the primal molecules grow thinner or fatter -- ex-nihilo, etc.?)

I was not aware that atoms were considered by you as something nihil. Are not the molecules considered in science as compound [of] atoms?

CN-28_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Ex-nihilo is a Latin phrase meaning "out of nothing". It often appears in conjunction with the concept of creation, as in "creation out of nothing."

Page 29

Your science knows only of such compound molecules, and a primal atom is and will remain for ever as a hypothetical abstraction for it. Science can know nothing of the nature of atoms outside the region of effects on her globe and even that atom she calls indivisible, which we do not, for we know of the existence and properties of the universal solvent--the essence of the Panchamahabutam--the five elements. Even the existence of the atoms which compose the unseen medium through

CN-29_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 30

which the power which magnetises instantly a short iron rod placed across the centre of a hoop two yards in diameter around which a wire thickly covered with india rubber is coiled, – even the existence of such atoms I say, remains an open question and science remains puzzled and embarrassed to decide whether it is an action at a distance without or with some mysterious medium – or what?


(3) To changes in their polarity.

This differentiation in activity is manifestation, and everything so differentiated comes into existence or becomes conceivable for us. Each

CN-30_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Action at a distance without. In several editions of the Cosmological Notes the word "distance" is erroneously transcribed as "distant." Also, notice than in Sinnett's transcript there is no comma after "without" as it appears in printed editions.

Page 31

centre of activity (and these centres are countless) marks a solar system, but these are still rari nantes in gurgite vasto, hanging in the all-pervading ocean of the unmanifested universe, out of which new manifestations are perpetually evolving, and into the oblivion of which others whose cycle has been completed are ever returning.

Alternations of activity and passivity constitute the cyclic law of the universe. As the microcosm man has his days and nights, his waking and his sleeping hours, so has the earth, which, a macrocosm to him is a microcosm to the solar system, and so has this latter, which, a macrocosm to a single globe, is itself a microcosm to the universe.

CN-31_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Rari nantes in gurgite vasto is a Latin phrase found in the Virgil's Aeneid (I, 118) meaning "rare survivors in the vast abyss."

Page 32

That the universe itself must similarly have its days and nights of activity and passivity, is probable by analogy, but if so these cover periods unthinkable, and the fact remains unknowable by the highest intelligences conditioned in the universe.

Is this correct? If not when the entire universe goes into pralaya (what is your Tibetan word?) how can anyone know anything about it?

Maha bar do -- the period between death and regeneration of man is so called -- also Chhe bar do.

They can know for this is but our scan, or as you say by analogy.

CN-32_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Chhe bar do (che bar-do). The Tibetan word che (Skt. mahā) means "big," "great," "huge," and bar-do "intermediate state," "interval."

Page 33

The night of the solar system, the pralaya of the Hindus, the Maha bar do or great night of mind of the Tibetans, involves the disintegration of all form and the return of that portion of the universe occupied by that system, to its passive unmanifested condition, space pervaded by atoms in motion. Everything else passes away for the time, but matter which these ultimate atoms represent (though at times objective, at times potential or subjective, now organised, now unorganised) is eternal and indestructible, and motion is the imperishable life (conscious or unconscious as the case may be) of matter. Even therefore during the night of mind, when all other forces are paralysed, when Chyang -- omniscience, and Chyang mi shi kon -- ignorance, both sleep, and

CN-33_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Maha bar do. See note on previous page.
  • Chang (Chi-ang) (tib.) knowing anything, omniscient.
  • Chang-mi-she(s)-khan (tib.) ignorant, stupid.

Page 34

everything else rests, this latent unconscious life unceasingly maintains the molecules in which it is inherent in blind resultless and purposeless motion inter se.

Why should it be more purposeless and resultless than the unconscious blind motion of the atoms in any foetus preparing for rebirth?

The solar system has disappeared even to the highest intelligences in other solar systems.

Is this correct? Can the planetaries in any way cognise the passive non-being portions of the universe?

They can.

Adepts can at will I know create forms out of cosmic matter, but probably this cosmic matter is many degrees from matter as it

CN-34_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Inter se is Latin for "among themselves."

Page 35

exists in the passive latent universe, which perhaps should rather be called potential rather than cosmic matter.

Potentiality is a possibility not an actuality. Find a better word.

But nothing has been annihilated any more than anything has been ever created; only, this recently active, organised, manifested and existing portion of the universe losing all differentiation of its parts, has passed into its primordial passive homogeneous unmanifested, and quoad all intelligences, non-existent or inconceivable state. It has resettled into chaos.

If it is asked whence these alterations of activity and passivity the reply is that they are the law inherent in the universe.

(Here as a footnote would come the

CN-35_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Quoad, from the Latin, meaning "regarding, with respect to."

Page 36

(purport of the argument approved by you against the unnecessary creation of an intelligence outside the self-governed universe.)

If you can show me one being or object in the universe which does not originate and develop through, and in accordance with blind law, then only will your argument hold good and footnote be necessary. The doctrine of evolution is an eternal protest. Evolution means unfolding of the evolute from the involute, a process of gradual growth. The only thing that could have possibly been spontaneously created is cosmic matter, and

CN-36_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 37

primordium with us means not only primogenitureship but eternalism, for matter is eternal and one of the Hlün dhüb not a Kyen -- a cause, itself the result of some primary cause. Were it so, at the end of every Maha pralaya when the whole cosmos moves into collective perfection and every atom (that you call primordial, and we eternal) emanates from itself a still finer atom -- every individual atom containing in itself the actual potentiality of evoluting milliards of worlds each more perfect

CN-37_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Hlün dhüb (lhun-grub) is a Tibetan word for "self-existing," "spontaneous," "without effort."
  • Kyen (rkyen) is Tibetan for "cause" or "condition."

Page 38

and more ethereal, -- how is it that there is no sign of such an intelligence outside the self-governed universe? You take a last hypothesis -- a portion of your god sits in every atom. He is divided ad infinitum, he remains concealed in abscondito and the logical conclusion we arrive at is, that as the Infinite mind of the Dyan Chohans knows that the newly emanated atoms are incapable of any conscious or unconscious action, unless they receive the intellectual impulse from them, Ergo your

CN-38_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 39

god is no better than blind matter ever propelled by as blind eternal force or law, which is that matter's god -- Perchance. Well, well we shall not lose time over such talk.

The period of passivity ends, the night of mind ceases, the solar system awakes and re-emerges into manifestation and existence, and everything throughout it is once more as it was when the night set in. Though a period inconceivable to human minds has passed, it has passed but as a sound and dreamless sleep. The law of activity comes again into operation, the centre of evolution resumes its work, the fount of being commences to flow again.

CN-39_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 40

I conclude this must be so or otherwise the matter ejected from the vortex or Central point would find none in a differentiated state from which to acquire its own impulse of differentiation.

When the hour strikes the cosmic atoms already in a differentiated state remain statu quo, as well as globes and everything else in the process of formation. Therefore you have seized the idea.

In the still passive portion of the Universe in which, and interpenetrated by which, hangs the remanifested solar system; in the non-being where subsists the eternal mechanical motion, its

CN-40_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 41

uncreated cause, a vortex is formed which in its ceaseless rotation perpetually ejects into the polarised active manifested conscious Universe, the unpolarised passive unmanifested and unconscious Universal element.

Call it motion, cosmic matter, duration or space, for it is all these and yet one, this the Universe manifested and unmanifested and there is nothing else in the Universe. But the moment it passes out of passivity (or non-being) into activity (or being), it begins to change its state and differentiate, from contact with what had formerly changed, and so the eternal wheel rolls on, the effect of to-day becoming the cause of tomorrow for ever and ever. But it must ever be remembered that the non-being -- the passive, is the eternal,

CN-41_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 42

the real; the being -- the active, the transitory and the unreal. For longer or shorter as its career may be according to the impulses it receives, sooner or later the manifested disintegrates into the unmanifested, and being fades into non-being.

But how about the highest Planetaries? They surely do not return into non-being, but pass on to higher or at any rate different solar systems.

The highest state of Nirvana is the highest state of non-being. There comes a time when the whole infinitude sleeps or rests, when All is reimmersed in the one eternal and uncreated sum of all.

CN-42_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 43

The sum of the latent unconscious potentiality.

It has been stated that a differentiation of the primordial element is the basis of the manifested Universe, and we must now consider the seven different principles that constitute and govern that Universe or in other words the seven different states or conditions in which this element exists in it.

There is no finite or primordial design but in conjunction with organised matter. Design is Kyen, a cause arising from a primary one. The latent design exists from the eternity in the one unborn eternal

CN-42_thm.jpg

NOTES:

  • Kyen (rkyen) is Tibetan for "cause" or "condition."

Page 44

atom or the central point which is everywhere and nowhere, called -- (our most secret incommunicable name given at the initiation to the highest adepts). So I can give you the six names of the principles of our solar system, but have to withhold the rest and even the name of the seventh. Call it the unknown and explain why. A Dam-ze (Brahman) will not give you the name of even the crown of the Akasa, but will

CN-44_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Page 45

speak of the six primary forces in nature represented by the Astral light. I'll give you the principles by and bye. Study this well first.

CN-45_thm.jpg

NOTES:

Online resources

Articles

Notes

  1. See The Early Days of Theosophy in Europe., pp. 14-15, by A. P. Sinnett
  2. Letter of Boris de Zirkoff to Fritz Kunz. December 23, 1956. Boris de Zirkoff Papers. Records Series 22. Theosophical Society in America Archives.
  3. These were published by C. Jinarājadāsa in his book The Early Teachings of the Masters, Section VI, Ethics and Philosophy, Letter No. 1.
  4. See Cosmological Notes at Blavatsky Study Center
  5. David Reigle, Blavatsky's Secret Books (San Diego, CA: Wizards Bookshelf, 1999), 62
  6. David Reigle, Blavatsky's Secret Books (San Diego, CA: Wizards Bookshelf, 1999), 64