Fragments of Occult Truth (article): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
On November 1882 an article entitled '''[https://theosophy.wiki/w/images/5/5f/Occult_Fragments_and_Book_of_Khiu-Te.pdf "Occult Fragments and the Book of Khiu-Te"]''' was written by "N.D.K.---, F.T.S.", commenting upon the teachings of the first "Fragment". This has been assigned by some to Mme. Blavatsky, but "N.D.K." refers to [[N. D. Khandalavala]]. | On November 1882 an article entitled '''[https://theosophy.wiki/w/images/5/5f/Occult_Fragments_and_Book_of_Khiu-Te.pdf "Occult Fragments and the Book of Khiu-Te"]''' was written by "N.D.K.---, F.T.S.", commenting upon the teachings of the first "Fragment". This has been assigned by some to Mme. Blavatsky, but "N.D.K." refers to [[N. D. Khandalavala]]. | ||
The later installments of the "Fragments" were written by Mr. Sinnett and signed by him as "A Lay-Chela" (authorized by Mahatma K.H. in [[Mahatma Letter No. 68#Page 34|Letter 68]] (Barker No. 16)). They were published in ''The Theosophist'' on October and November 1882, and March, April, and May 1883. Most of the information in these articles was later used by A. P. Sinnett in his book [[Esoteric Buddhism (book)|''Esoteric Buddhism'']]. | The later installments of the "Fragments" were written by Mr. Sinnett and signed by him as "A Lay-Chela" (authorized by Mahatma K.H. in '''[[Mahatma Letter No. 68#Page 34|Letter 68]]''' (Barker No. 16)). They were published in ''The Theosophist'' on October and November 1882, and March, April, and May 1883. Most of the information in these articles was later used by A. P. Sinnett in his book [[Esoteric Buddhism (book)|''Esoteric Buddhism'']]. | ||
On March 1883, following the sixth installment of the Fragments, there is an '''[https://theosophy.wiki/w/images/5/5f/Appendix_to_Devachan.pdf "Appendix to 'Devachan'"]''' consisting of five notes (from A to E) without stating the author. In [[Mahatma Letter No. 104#Page 17|Letter 104]] (Barker No. 25) KH writes, "Hence — my orders to a chela to reproduce in an Appendix to your article extracts from this letter and explanations calculated to disabuse the reader,.." Much of the Appendix is verbatim from this letter. | On March 1883, following the sixth installment of the Fragments, there is an '''[https://theosophy.wiki/w/images/5/5f/Appendix_to_Devachan.pdf "Appendix to 'Devachan'"]''' consisting of five notes (from A to E) without stating the author. In '''[[Mahatma Letter No. 104#Page 17|Letter 104]]''' (Barker No. 25) KH writes, "Hence — my orders to a chela to reproduce in an Appendix to your article extracts from this letter and explanations calculated to disabuse the reader,.." Much of the Appendix is verbatim from this letter. | ||
On May 1883 (p. 202) [[Franz Hartmann]] wrote the article "Devachan (Explanations of Fragments of Occult Truth)" and on July of that year (p. 252) there was an anonymous article "Karma (An Appendix to Fragments of Occult Truth)" which has been assigned to Mme. Blavatsky. | On May 1883 (p. 202) [[Franz Hartmann]] wrote the article '''[https://theosophy.wiki/en/File:Hartmann_on_Devachan.pdf "Devachan (Explanations of Fragments of Occult Truth)"]''' and on July of that year (p. 252) there was an anonymous article "Karma (An Appendix to Fragments of Occult Truth)" which has been assigned to Mme. Blavatsky. | ||
== Series summary == | == Series summary == | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
* [[Mahatma Letter No. 68#Page 34|Letter 68]] (Barker No. 16), page 34. | * [[Mahatma Letter No. 68#Page 34|Letter 68]] (Barker No. 16), page 34. | ||
* [[Mahatma Letter No. 104#Page 17|Letter 104]] (Barker No. 25), page 17. | * [[Mahatma Letter No. 104#Page 17|Letter 104]] (Barker No. 25), page 17. | ||
* [https://theosophy.wiki/en/File:Hartmann_on_Devachan.pdf "Devachan (Explanations of Fragments of Occult Truth)"] by Franz Hartmann. ''The Theosophist'' 4 no. 8 (May, 1883), 202. | |||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
Revision as of 17:34, 20 June 2022
The Fragments of Occult Truth is a series of articles published in The Theosophist in the early 1880's. The articles were written by Allan Octavian Hume and Alfred Percy Sinnett, based upon teachings they received from H. P. Blavatsky and the letters written by Mahatmas K.H. and M.
History and authorship
The first three "Fragments" were written by A. O. Hume, without signing them, and published in The Theosophist on October 1881, March 1882, and September 1882. These articles are replies to letters written by Australian Theosophist William H. Terry about the Spiritualistic phenomena and the occult explanation of them.
The first article in the series marks the first time that the seven-fold constitution of human beings was publicly taught in Theosophical literature. The information came from teachings that Hume and Sinnett were receiving from the Mahatmas, as well as conversations with H. P. Blavatsky, who stayed as a guest of Hume in Simla for a couple of months at the time. In 1895 G. R. S. Mead wrongly assigned them to Mme. Blavatsky, publishing them in the book A Modern Panarion.
On November 1882 an article entitled "Occult Fragments and the Book of Khiu-Te" was written by "N.D.K.---, F.T.S.", commenting upon the teachings of the first "Fragment". This has been assigned by some to Mme. Blavatsky, but "N.D.K." refers to N. D. Khandalavala.
The later installments of the "Fragments" were written by Mr. Sinnett and signed by him as "A Lay-Chela" (authorized by Mahatma K.H. in Letter 68 (Barker No. 16)). They were published in The Theosophist on October and November 1882, and March, April, and May 1883. Most of the information in these articles was later used by A. P. Sinnett in his book Esoteric Buddhism.
On March 1883, following the sixth installment of the Fragments, there is an "Appendix to 'Devachan'" consisting of five notes (from A to E) without stating the author. In Letter 104 (Barker No. 25) KH writes, "Hence — my orders to a chela to reproduce in an Appendix to your article extracts from this letter and explanations calculated to disabuse the reader,.." Much of the Appendix is verbatim from this letter.
On May 1883 (p. 202) Franz Hartmann wrote the article "Devachan (Explanations of Fragments of Occult Truth)" and on July of that year (p. 252) there was an anonymous article "Karma (An Appendix to Fragments of Occult Truth)" which has been assigned to Mme. Blavatsky.
Series summary
| Article | Title (linked to PDF) | Author | Month, year | Volume, issue number | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fragments of Occult Truth | A. O. Hume | October, 1881 | Vol. 3 No. 1 (No. 25) | 17-22 |
| 2 | Fragments of Occult Truth | A. O. Hume | March, 1882 | Vol. 3 No. 6 (No. 30) | 157-160 |
| 3 | Fragments of Occult Truth | A. O. Hume | September, 1882 | Vol. 3 No. 12 (No. 36) | 307-314 |
| 4 | The Evolution of Man | A. P. Sinnett | October, 1882 | Vol. 4 No. 1 (No. 37) | 2-5 |
| 5 | The Evolution of Man - continued | A. P. Sinnett | November, 1882 | Vol. 4 No. 2 (No. 38) | 46-48 |
| 6 | Devachan | A. P. Sinnett | March, 1883 | Vol. 4 No. 6 (No. 42) | 131-135 |
| 7 | The Human Life Wave | A. P. Sinnett | April, 1883 | Vol. 4 No. 7 (No. 43) | 161-164 |
| 8 | The Progress of Humanity | A. P. Sinnett | May, 1883 | Vol. 4 No. 8 (No. 44) | 194-195 |
Other digital versions
Related materials
- Appendix to Devachan The Theosophist 4 no. 6 (March, 1883), 135-137. Signed as "N.D.K.---, F.T.S.", who was probably N. D. Khandalavala.
- "Occult Fragments and the Book of Khiu-Te" The Theosophist 4 no. 2 (November, 1882), 28.
- Letter 68 (Barker No. 16), page 34.
- Letter 104 (Barker No. 25), page 17.
- "Devachan (Explanations of Fragments of Occult Truth)" by Franz Hartmann. The Theosophist 4 no. 8 (May, 1883), 202.